Richard 111

Dear all
The news of the discovery of a body is keeping me on edge, I tried to get channel four interested in the dig in Liecester, but they only thanked me for my email. The whole concept of rediscovering Richard should be the main item on the news, it is very frustrating.
     Sincere best wishes
           Philip

Dear everyone
I believe in my heart Richard has been discovered and should be laid to rest where he deserves, Westminster Abbey. This man died leading a charge against Henry Tudor, what a way to go, therefore he should be buried in the abbey, regardless of what anyone says. He has been much maligned for nearly 600 years, surely he has earned a place of rest, fitting for a King of England.

There are plenty of kings in other places - Edward II at Gloucester,
Henry IV at Canterbury, Edward IV at Windsor (isn't he?) It was Henry
VII who set up Westminster as The Place to Be Buried, and I hope Richard
steers well clear.

On 18/09/2012 18:38, PHILIP wrote:
> Dear everyone
> I believe in my heart Richard has been discovered and should be laid to rest where he deserves, Westminster Abbey. This man died leading a charge against Henry Tudor, what a way to go, therefore he should be buried in the abbey, regardless of what anyone says. He has been much maligned for nearly 600 years, surely he has earned a place of rest, fitting for a King of England.
>

--
Best wishes
Christine

Christine Headley
Butterrow, Stroud, Glos

Me too and frankly where would they put him with a tomb that was appropriate? 



________________________________
From: Christine Headley <christinelheadley@...>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 18 September 2012, 18:53
Subject: Re: Richard 111


 

There are plenty of kings in other places - Edward II at Gloucester,
Henry IV at Canterbury, Edward IV at Windsor (isn't he?) It was Henry
VII who set up Westminster as The Place to Be Buried, and I hope Richard
steers well clear.

On 18/09/2012 18:38, PHILIP wrote:
> Dear everyone
> I believe in my heart Richard has been discovered and should be laid to rest where he deserves, Westminster Abbey. This man died leading a charge against Henry Tudor, what a way to go, therefore he should be buried in the abbey, regardless of what anyone says. He has been much maligned for nearly 600 years, surely he has earned a place of rest, fitting for a King of England.
>

--
Best wishes
Christine

Christine Headley
Butterrow, Stroud, Glos

And wouldn't his own wishes come into it? I feel Leicester deserves
the honor, but, if not there, than York.

Gilda



On Sep 18, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Christine Headley wrote:

>
> There are plenty of kings in other places - Edward II at Gloucester,
> Henry IV at Canterbury, Edward IV at Windsor (isn't he?) It was Henry
> VII who set up Westminster as The Place to Be Buried, and I hope
> Richard
> steers well clear.
>
> On 18/09/2012 18:38, PHILIP wrote:
>> Dear everyone
>> I believe in my heart Richard has been discovered and should be
>> laid to rest where he deserves, Westminster Abbey. This man died
>> leading a charge against Henry Tudor, what a way to go, therefore
>> he should be buried in the abbey, regardless of what anyone says.
>> He has been much maligned for nearly 600 years, surely he has
>> earned a place of rest, fitting for a King of England.
>>
>
> --
> Best wishes
> Christine
>
> Christine Headley
> Butterrow, Stroud, Glos
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>