(no subject)

Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding on.

What nasty comments on Wiki?

--- In , Carol Darling <cdarlingart1@...> wrote:
>
> Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding on.
>

???

--- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> What nasty comments on Wiki?
>
> --- In , Carol Darling <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding on.
> >
>

I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character? He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.

--- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> ???
>
> --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> >
> > --- In , Carol Darling <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding on.
> > >
> >
>

Oh yes!



________________________________
From: blancsanglier1452 <blancsanglier1452@...>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 20:15
Subject: (unknown)

 


I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character? He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.

--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> ???
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding on.
> > >
> >
>

Paul Barlow..who he?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
>
>
> --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ???
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > >
> > > --- In , Carol Darling
> <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> on.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>

The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis. 



________________________________
From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@...>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
Subject: Re: (unknown)

Paul Barlow..who he?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
>
>
> I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
>
>
> --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ???
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > >
> > > --- In , Carol Darling
> <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> on.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> 
>






------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

Then he is stupid beyond belief.......

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
ferrymansdaughter@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@...>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> Subject: Re: (unknown)
>
>
> Paul Barlow..who he?
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
> > **
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> >
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ???
> > >
> > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > >
> > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > on.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.

--- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@...> wrote:
>
> Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> ferrymansdaughter@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@...>
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> >
> >
> > Paul Barlow..who he?
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ???
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > on.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
Bestest Eileen

--- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
> I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
>
> --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> >
> > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ???
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.

--- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@...> wrote:
>
> My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> Bestest Eileen
>
> --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> >
> > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ???
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > on.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)

--- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
> Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> >
> > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > Bestest Eileen
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > >
> > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > To:
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > **
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)

LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...

--- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@...> wrote:
>
> OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
>
> --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> >
> > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> >
> > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > Bestest Eileen
> > >
> > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > >
> > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > **
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > To:
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > **
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)

--- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
> The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
>
> LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> >
> > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > **
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.

--- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
>
> --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> >
> > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> >
> > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> >
> > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > >
> > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > >
> > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

What's a talk page??
And who the heck is Paul Barlow?

Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....

--- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > >
> > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

I can't see your talkpage mate but I had to leave off dealing with the subject of this thread ;) he was driving me nuts. Arrogant pr*ck. The interweb does seem to encourage cretininity...?! If that's a word!!!

--- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > >
> > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

No, Wikipedia.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End




Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

LOLOL



________________________________
From: blancsanglier1452 <blancsanglier1452@...>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End


 
I can't see your talkpage mate but I had to leave off dealing with the subject of this thread ;) he was driving me nuts. Arrogant pr*ck. The interweb does seem to encourage cretininity...?! If that's a word!!!

--- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> >
> > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > >
> > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > >
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen

--- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> No, Wikipedia.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>
>
>
> Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page??
> > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> >
> > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> >
> > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen

--- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> No, Wikipedia.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>
>
>
> Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page??
> > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> >
> > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> >
> > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?

Eileen
--- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>
>
> Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
>
> --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > No, Wikipedia.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page??
> > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > >
> > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > >
> > > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

I think Stephen is hiding under the duvet Eileen ;)

I might be completely wrong (in fact I hope I am) but I've got a nasty feeling this Barlow character MIGHT work at University of Northumbria... and apros pro Lambert Simnel, NOT in the kitchens unfortunately...

http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/staff/phonebook/?txt3=barlow&txt5=&txt95=&txt59=&CMD=D&LO=EXP&0=1&1=13607

--- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?
>
> Eileen
> --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
> >
> > --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No, Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > >
> > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

I find it almost impossible to deal with self-appointed editors on Wikipedia. I only manage one page (my husband's place of work) and I'm constantly coming into contact with an editing nutcase. Good luck! Maire.
--- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:
>
> I think Stephen is hiding under the duvet Eileen ;)
>
> I might be completely wrong (in fact I hope I am) but I've got a nasty feeling this Barlow character MIGHT work at University of Northumbria... and apros pro Lambert Simnel, NOT in the kitchens unfortunately...
>
> http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/staff/phonebook/?txt3=barlow&txt5=&txt95=&txt59=&CMD=D&LO=EXP&0=1&1=13607
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?
> >
> > Eileen
> > --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
> > >
> > > --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, Wikipedia.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: EileenB
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > > --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > > >
> > > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

My editor is different - "Deb". She keeps seeing differences between the two marriage ceremonies. She won't recognise the first without written evidence but won't de-recognise the second without written evidence against it.
Edward IV was either a bigamist or died a bachelor.

----- Original Message -----
From: blancsanglier1452
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



I think Stephen is hiding under the duvet Eileen ;)

I might be completely wrong (in fact I hope I am) but I've got a nasty feeling this Barlow character MIGHT work at University of Northumbria... and apros pro Lambert Simnel, NOT in the kitchens unfortunately...

http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/staff/phonebook/?txt3=barlow&txt5=&txt95=&txt59=&CMD=D&LO=EXP&0=1&1=13607

--- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?
>
> Eileen
> --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
> >
> > --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No, Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > >
> > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > >
> > > > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Not that different unfortunately, her and that Barlow character are hand in glove and generally back each other up. He doesn't believe anything that was written before Sept 1485 and she doesn't seem to believe that anything was...

***shrug***

--- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> My editor is different - "Deb". She keeps seeing differences between the two marriage ceremonies. She won't recognise the first without written evidence but won't de-recognise the second without written evidence against it.
> Edward IV was either a bigamist or died a bachelor.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: blancsanglier1452
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 6:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>
>
> I think Stephen is hiding under the duvet Eileen ;)
>
> I might be completely wrong (in fact I hope I am) but I've got a nasty feeling this Barlow character MIGHT work at University of Northumbria... and apros pro Lambert Simnel, NOT in the kitchens unfortunately...
>
> http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/staff/phonebook/?txt3=barlow&txt5=&txt95=&txt59=&CMD=D&LO=EXP&0=1&1=13607
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?
> >
> > Eileen
> > --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
> > >
> > > --- In , "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, Wikipedia.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: EileenB
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > > --- In , "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > > >
> > > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In , "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In , "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

I've just had a look at Wiki - I  see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler.  I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor.  She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page. 
 
Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page.  I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby.  If it was her, can she do that?
 
What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed".  I've also noticed that sometimes they  have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves!  I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.


________________________________
From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
No, Wikipedia.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Is it a proper university ?  (I know that sounds horrible but I've never heard of it)  Is it one of the Russell Group universities? 



________________________________
From: blancsanglier1452 <blancsanglier1452@...>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 18:45
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
I think Stephen is hiding under the duvet Eileen ;)

I might be completely wrong (in fact I hope I am) but I've got a nasty feeling this Barlow character MIGHT work at University of Northumbria... and apros pro Lambert Simnel, NOT in the kitchens unfortunately...

http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/staff/phonebook/?txt3=barlow&txt5=&txt95=&txt59=&CMD=D&LO=EXP&0=1&1=13607

--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?
>
> Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No, Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > >
> > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

I know I should read all the messages in a thread before posting - you DO mean Deb.



________________________________
From: liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...>
To: "" <>
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 20:46
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
I've just had a look at Wiki - I  see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler.  I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor.  She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page. 
 
Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page.  I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby.  If it was her, can she do that?
 
What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed".  I've also noticed that sometimes they  have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves!  I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.

________________________________
From: Stephen Lark <mailto:stephenmlark%40talktalk.net>
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
No, Wikipedia.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

I think some "concert party activity" is called for;)

----- Original Message -----
From: liz williams
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



I've just had a look at Wiki - I see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.

Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?

What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.

________________________________
From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End


No, Wikipedia.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Newcastle Polytechnic, as was.

----- Original Message -----
From: liz williams
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



Is it a proper university ? (I know that sounds horrible but I've never heard of it) Is it one of the Russell Group universities?

________________________________
From: blancsanglier1452 <blancsanglier1452@...>
To:
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 18:45
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End


I think Stephen is hiding under the duvet Eileen ;)

I might be completely wrong (in fact I hope I am) but I've got a nasty feeling this Barlow character MIGHT work at University of Northumbria... and apros pro Lambert Simnel, NOT in the kitchens unfortunately...

http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/staff/phonebook/?txt3=barlow&txt5=&txt95=&txt59=&CMD=D&LO=EXP&0=1&1=13607

--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Stephen...I will take a look....This Paul Barlow...do you think his parents know he has got hold of a keyboard?
>
> Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smlark&diff=next&oldid=526714270
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry Stephen...I must be appearing thick here...but Im at a loss as to how to find your page...I have googled Wikipedia and then smlark....no luck...?? Eileen
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No, Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > >
> > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

I am tempting fate but she has gone quiet ever since the "bigamist or bachelor" question and my assertion about the uneven playing field revisionist historians face. I take it that you know "Underhill" to be the sloped former ground of Barnet FC?

----- Original Message -----
From: liz williams
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



I know I should read all the messages in a thread before posting - you DO mean Deb.

________________________________
From: liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...>
To: "" <>
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 20:46
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End


I've just had a look at Wiki - I see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.

Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?

What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.

________________________________
From: Stephen Lark <mailto:stephenmlark%40talktalk.net>
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End


No, Wikipedia.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

"Stephen Lark" wrote:
>
> My editor is different - "Deb". She keeps seeing differences between the two marriage ceremonies. She won't recognise the first without written evidence but won't de-recognise the second without written evidence against it.
> Edward IV was either a bigamist or died a bachelor.

Carol responds:

Has she seen Titulus Regius, which states specifically that the first was valid and that evidence can be produced on request regarding the invalidity of the second marriage? In terms fifteenth-century laws, that is. Our own would not apply.

Also, there are plenty of modern experts whose testimony you can provide.

Carol

"Stephen Lark" wrote:
> >
> > My editor is different - "Deb". She keeps seeing differences between the two marriage ceremonies. She won't recognise the first without written evidence but won't de-recognise the second without written evidence against it.
> > Edward IV was either a bigamist or died a bachelor.
>
Carol responded:
>
> Has she seen Titulus Regius <snip>


Carol again:

Sorry. I thought you meant that you were writing a book and your editor was refusing to accept your arguments despite supporting evidence. If you mean the idiots at Wikipedia, all I can say is, no wonder Wikipedia has such a bad reputation.

Carol

Oh you all are braver than me!  I quit reading Wikipedia, made me too angry!
Vickie

From: liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...>
To: "" <>
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
I've just had a look at Wiki - I  see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler.  I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor.  She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page. 
 
Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page.  I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby.  If it was her, can she do that?
 
What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed".  I've also noticed that sometimes they  have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves!  I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.

________________________________
From: Stephen Lark <mailto:stephenmlark%40talktalk.net>
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
No, Wikipedia.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> What's a talk page??
> And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
>
> Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > >
> > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

The pontificating of "editors" on Wikipedia drives me crazy! All these people with no lives threatening others that they will be removed or blocked. Some of these "editors" do nothing more than stay on Wikipedia all day like Stalin minions! And I agree: they often have one or two email addresses which allows them to post the same opinion and then agree with themselves! Grrr...Maire.

--- In , Vickie Cook <lolettecook@...> wrote:
>
> Oh you all are braver than me!  I quit reading Wikipedia, made me too angry!
> Vickie
>
> From: liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...>
> To: "" <>
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>  
> I've just had a look at Wiki - I  see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler.  I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor.  She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page. 
>  
> Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page.  I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby.  If it was her, can she do that?
>  
> What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed".  I've also noticed that sometimes they  have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves!  I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stephen Lark <mailto:stephenmlark%40talktalk.net>
> To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>  
> No, Wikipedia.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page??
> > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> >
> > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

I am not really sure if I am qualified to write a book. I do have a C16 international idea that ought to be exposed to a wider audience in much greater detail. My degree was in mathematics and not history but I do have an aptitude for genealogy.
Anyway, "Deb" is definitely Welsh and cannot choose between the bigamy and bachelorhood explanations.

----- Original Message -----
From: justcarol67
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



"Stephen Lark" wrote:
> >
> > My editor is different - "Deb". She keeps seeing differences between the two marriage ceremonies. She won't recognise the first without written evidence but won't de-recognise the second without written evidence against it.
> > Edward IV was either a bigamist or died a bachelor.
>
Carol responded:
>
> Has she seen Titulus Regius <snip>

Carol again:

Sorry. I thought you meant that you were writing a book and your editor was refusing to accept your arguments despite supporting evidence. If you mean the idiots at Wikipedia, all I can say is, no wonder Wikipedia has such a bad reputation.

Carol

Basically do you think these people need to get out more?? Eileen

--- In , liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...> wrote:
>
> I've just had a look at Wiki - I  see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler.  I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor.  She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page. 
>  
> Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page.  I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby.  If it was her, can she do that?
>  
> What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed".  I've also noticed that sometimes they  have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves!  I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>  
> No, Wikipedia.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page??
> > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> >
> > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes - in a blizzard, Captain Oates style.

----- Original Message -----
From: EileenB
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End



Basically do you think these people need to get out more?? Eileen

--- In , liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...> wrote:
>
> I've just had a look at Wiki - I  see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.Â
> Â
> Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?
> Â
> What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> Â
> No, Wikipedia.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page??
> > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> >
> > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Much that I am tempted to respond to "rabid Tudor" statements I feel that far a far more lasting effort can be made by providing detailed and indisputable facts on the R3 site. There will always be people who will argue over any evidence or facts especially after 500 years of prior Tudor propaganda written by a master playwright!
Showing people the truth will eventually win the battle when a Internet mud slinging contest is unlikely to overcome centuries of prejudice.
You never know learned professors may not refer to R3 as a homicidal hunchback when lecturing future historians!

George

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:11 PM, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:

> I think some "concert party activity" is called for;)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: liz williams
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> I've just had a look at Wiki - I see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.
>
> Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?
>
> What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> No, Wikipedia.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: EileenB
> To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
> Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@...> wrote:
> >
> > What's a talk page??
> > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> >
> > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
--- In , George Butterfield <gbutterf1@...> wrote:
>
> Much that I am tempted to respond to "rabid Tudor" statements I feel that far a far more lasting effort can be made by providing detailed and indisputable facts on the R3 site. There will always be people who will argue over any evidence or facts especially after 500 years of prior Tudor propaganda written by a master playwright!
> Showing people the truth will eventually win the battle when a Internet mud slinging contest is unlikely to overcome centuries of prejudice.
> You never know learned professors may not refer to R3 as a homicidal hunchback when lecturing future historians!
>
> George
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:11 PM, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> > I think some "concert party activity" is called for;)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: liz williams
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> > I've just had a look at Wiki - I see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.
> >
> > Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?
> >
> > What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> > Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> > No, Wikipedia.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page??
> > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > >
> > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Eileen,
 
basically anyone can edit Wikipedia.  That is one of the reasons it's rubbish.    We could, for example, change an article about the princes in the tower to say that one of them  secretly escaped to Europe, changed his name to Christofer Colon and "discovered" America.  I'm sure the edit would be removed pretty quickly but there is nothing to stop us doing it.

From: EileenB <b.eileen25@...>
To:
Sent: Friday, 7 December 2012, 13:30
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 

How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, George Butterfield <gbutterf1@...> wrote:
>
> Much that I am tempted to respond to "rabid Tudor" statements I feel that far a far more lasting effort can be made by providing detailed and indisputable facts on the R3 site. There will always be people who will argue over any evidence or facts especially after 500 years of prior Tudor propaganda written by a master playwright!
> Showing people the truth will eventually win the battle when a Internet mud slinging contest is unlikely to overcome centuries of prejudice.
> You never know learned professors may not refer to R3 as a homicidal hunchback when lecturing future historians!
>
> George
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:11 PM, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@...> wrote:
>
> > I think some "concert party activity" is called for;)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: liz williams
> > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> > I've just had a look at Wiki - I see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.
> >
> > Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?
> >
> > What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@...>
> > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> > Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> > No, Wikipedia.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: EileenB
> > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> >
> > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a talk page??
> > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > >
> > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > >
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Hi Liz...I had seen and noted comments that Wiki was unreliable and I take this into consideration whenever I have used it to check anything... Which seems a bit daft as you are left thinking I wonder/hope if this is correct....lol. This 'Debs' person seems a bit over the top. Best to be avoided I think....Eileen

--- In , liz williams <ferrymansdaughter@...> wrote:
>
> Eileen,
>  
> basically anyone can edit Wikipedia.  That is one of the reasons it's rubbish.    We could, for example, change an article about the princes in the tower to say that one of them  secretly escaped to Europe, changed his name to Christofer Colon and "discovered" America.  I'm sure the edit would be removed pretty quickly but there is nothing to stop us doing it.
>
> From: EileenB <b.eileen25@...>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, 7 December 2012, 13:30
> Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
>
>  
>
> How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, George Butterfield <gbutterf1@> wrote:
> >
> > Much that I am tempted to respond to "rabid Tudor" statements I feel that far a far more lasting effort can be made by providing detailed and indisputable facts on the R3 site. There will always be people who will argue over any evidence or facts especially after 500 years of prior Tudor propaganda written by a master playwright!
> > Showing people the truth will eventually win the battle when a Internet mud slinging contest is unlikely to overcome centuries of prejudice.
> > You never know learned professors may not refer to R3 as a homicidal hunchback when lecturing future historians!
> >
> > George
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:11 PM, "Stephen Lark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> >
> > > I think some "concert party activity" is called for;)
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: liz williams
> > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:46 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > > I've just had a look at Wiki - I see you mean "Deb" on the article about Eleanor Butler. I think she is Welsh and she is rabidly pro Tudor. She's also put a note on Paul Barlow's talk page asking him if he has seen the Eleanor Butler page.
> > >
> > > Also I'm not sure if it was her or you who has copied your talk page discussion with her onto the Eleanor Butler talk page. I assume it's her since it doesn't have your last comment about Warwick and Catesby. If it was her, can she do that?
> > >
> > > What particularly annoys me about people like this on Wiki is that they act as though they own the place making comments like "your edits will be removed". I've also noticed that sometimes they have more than one identity - i even knew a couple of people who would double post and agree with themselves! I've also noticed they tend to be involved in more than one dispute.
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Stephen Lark <stephenmlark@>
> > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, 6 December 2012, 17:25
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > > No, Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: EileenB
> > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:06 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End
> > >
> > > Stephen...is this tweeting you are referring to....If this is the case I wont be able to take a look....can you give us a brief rundown on what this person is saying? Eileen
> > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "bandyoi" <bandyoi@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What's a talk page??
> > > > And who the heck is Paul Barlow?
> > > >
> > > > Scary thing is people will think the same thing. They will assume that is one thing is correct, the rest is too.....
> > > >
> > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "stephenmlark" <stephenmlark@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Have a look at my talk page (smlark) as I have a similar individual on board who seems not to understand "secret" marriages.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What's a talk page...is it something to do with Facebook...
> > > > > > Anyway, you go for it Blancsanglier....Dont let this twit get away with it.....Give it your best shot...Eileen :0)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The theatre of conflict has moved onto my talk page ;)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LET THE GAMES COMMENCE...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK OK..your right....make that the sense of a can of baked beans then......:0)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Slightly harsh on monkeys that, Eileen!!!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#PAUL_BARLOW_IS_IGNORANT_OF_HIS_SUBJECT_AND_IS_PARTISAN_TOWARDS_IT.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My dear Blancsanglier, you might as well argue with a brick wall as to argue with someone who has the sense of a cartload of monkeys...
> > > > > > > > > > Bestest Eileen
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a row with him too but it's difficult to argue with someone as thick as that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Then he is stupid beyond belief.......
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, liz williams <
> > > > > > > > > > > > ferrymansdaughter@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The twit on Richard's wikipedia page who told me Tudor historians were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vindicated because it looks like Richard had scoliosis.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Eileen B <cherryripe.eileenb@>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To: mailto:%40yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 10 October 2012, 21:14
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: (unknown)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Barlow..who he?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, blancsanglier1452 <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just realised, are you talking about the 'Paul Barlow' character?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > He's a F*CKING CRETIN or what.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ???
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "blancsanglier1452"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <blancsanglier1452@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What nasty comments on Wiki?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, Carol Darling
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <cdarlingart1@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the Wikipedia nasty comments, I fear our determined
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struggle to clear Richards name and give him the correct placement in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > history is never going to give us any rest and peace. I guess the results
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Leister dig, will be our big "treat" and the fuel to keep plodding
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

My learned professor didn't mention him at all. It was more a matter of, "Henry Tudor won the last battle in the War of the Roses. All was right in England from then on. The details under the Tudors are heavenly, which detailed heaven I shall share with you in great detail over the next few detailed weeks."

Anyone who wanted to know about R3 beyond Shakepeare had to go looking for him. I don't think my learned professor knew where to look. It wasn't his specialty and therefore R3 didn't exist, not even as a footnote in the classroom.

It's almost as if those who are meant to find Richard and learn the truth just...do.


--- In , George Butterfield

> You never know learned professors may not refer to R3 as a homicidal hunchback when lecturing future historians!
>
> George

Not to denigrate university students, but I've been told by more than one person trying to get something corrected on Wiki that most of the people "editing" pages there are university students.

They have the time. They have the arrogance. They like to use 'sock puppets' to back up their bullying. And no one polices them.

I've also been told that if you go so far as to sign up on Wiki and edit pages, also including your sources, these "editors" will remove what you've done within hours.

~Weds

--- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
>
> How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen

Wednesday, you are absolutely correct! As almost everyone else my first contact with R3 was through Shakespeare and it took a novel to goad me into find more about him.....Almost everyone of my acquaintances are ignorant of his very existence other than " oh yeah, the one who killed his nephews to Mary his niece"!! <cringe>

Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com

On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:11 AM, "wednesday_mc" <wednesday.mac@...> wrote:

> My learned professor didn't mention him at all. It was more a matter of, "Henry Tudor won the last battle in the War of the Roses. All was right in England from then on. The details under the Tudors are heavenly, which detailed heaven I shall share with you in great detail over the next few detailed weeks."
>
> Anyone who wanted to know about R3 beyond Shakepeare had to go looking for him. I don't think my learned professor knew where to look. It wasn't his specialty and therefore R3 didn't exist, not even as a footnote in the classroom.
>
> It's almost as if those who are meant to find Richard and learn the truth just...do.
>
> --- In , George Butterfield
>
> > You never know learned professors may not refer to R3 as a homicidal hunchback when lecturing future historians!
> >
> > George
>
>

Wednesday...Well....Ive gone well and truely off Wiki now...What do you mean by 'sock puppet'...I presume sign in under a different name to back yourself up....haha...hilarious. These people seriously need to get a life...
Eileen

--- In , "wednesday_mc" <wednesday.mac@...> wrote:
>
> Not to denigrate university students, but I've been told by more than one person trying to get something corrected on Wiki that most of the people "editing" pages there are university students.
>
> They have the time. They have the arrogance. They like to use 'sock puppets' to back up their bullying. And no one polices them.
>
> I've also been told that if you go so far as to sign up on Wiki and edit pages, also including your sources, these "editors" will remove what you've done within hours.
>
> ~Weds
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
>

There you ave it. Just fallen for the oldest trick in the book. Now I've been blocked from editing! Thanks to rowing with a certain gormless erection ('scuse my middle English!) about individuals not unrelated to 15th C. English royalty... ;)

...although I admit that perhaps changing my username to 'PAUL BARLOW IS A BELL-END' probably didn't help ma case...?!?!

Happy Fridays!

--- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
> Wednesday...Well....Ive gone well and truely off Wiki now...What do you mean by 'sock puppet'...I presume sign in under a different name to back yourself up....haha...hilarious. These people seriously need to get a life...
> Eileen
>
> --- In , "wednesday_mc" <wednesday.mac@> wrote:
> >
> > Not to denigrate university students, but I've been told by more than one person trying to get something corrected on Wiki that most of the people "editing" pages there are university students.
> >
> > They have the time. They have the arrogance. They like to use 'sock puppets' to back up their bullying. And no one polices them.
> >
> > I've also been told that if you go so far as to sign up on Wiki and edit pages, also including your sources, these "editors" will remove what you've done within hours.
> >
> > ~Weds
> >
> > --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
> >
>

Well I'm sure it didn't help but who blocked you>  What I don't understand is how morons like that can get people blocked when they patently don't know what they're talking about  Have they removed your edits?



________________________________
From: blancsanglier1452 <blancsanglier1452@...>
To:
Sent: Saturday, 8 December 2012, 0:04
Subject: Re: Paul Barlow is a Bell-End

 
There you ave it. Just fallen for the oldest trick in the book. Now I've been blocked from editing! Thanks to rowing with a certain gormless erection ('scuse my middle English!) about individuals not unrelated to 15th C. English royalty... ;)

...although I admit that perhaps changing my username to 'PAUL BARLOW IS A BELL-END' probably didn't help ma case...?!?!

Happy Fridays!

--- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
> Wednesday...Well....Ive gone well and truely off Wiki now...What do you mean by 'sock puppet'...I presume sign in under a different name to back yourself up....haha...hilarious. These people seriously need to get a life...
> Eileen
>
> --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "wednesday_mc" <wednesday.mac@> wrote:
> >
> > Not to denigrate university students, but I've been told by more than one person trying to get something corrected on Wiki that most of the people "editing" pages there are university students.
> >
> > They have the time. They have the arrogance. They like to use 'sock puppets' to back up their bullying. And no one polices them.
> >
> > I've also been told that if you go so far as to sign up on Wiki and edit pages, also including your sources, these "editors" will remove what you've done within hours.
> >
> > ~Weds
> >
> > --- In mailto:%40yahoogroups.com, "EileenB" <b.eileen25@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
> >
>

Hi, Eileen.

You're right in your definition. I submit for your consideration a somewhat ironic definition of "sock puppet," in that it comes from Wikipedia itself.

"A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a third party or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer."

More here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29


--- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
>
> Wednesday...Well....Ive gone well and truely off Wiki now...What do you mean by 'sock puppet'...I presume sign in under a different name to back yourself up....haha...hilarious. These people seriously need to get a life...
> Eileen

Ahhhh Blancs....Some people just have no sense of humour.......:0/ Eileen
On 8 Dec 2012, at 00:04, blancsanglier1452 wrote:

> There you ave it. Just fallen for the oldest trick in the book. Now I've been blocked from editing! Thanks to rowing with a certain gormless erection ('scuse my middle English!) about individuals not unrelated to 15th C. English royalty... ;)
>
> ...although I admit that perhaps changing my username to 'PAUL BARLOW IS A BELL-END' probably didn't help ma case...?!?!
>
> Happy Fridays!
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
> >
> > Wednesday...Well....Ive gone well and truely off Wiki now...What do you mean by 'sock puppet'...I presume sign in under a different name to back yourself up....haha...hilarious. These people seriously need to get a life...
> > Eileen
> >
> > --- In , "wednesday_mc" <wednesday.mac@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Not to denigrate university students, but I've been told by more than one person trying to get something corrected on Wiki that most of the people "editing" pages there are university students.
> > >
> > > They have the time. They have the arrogance. They like to use 'sock puppets' to back up their bullying. And no one polices them.
> > >
> > > I've also been told that if you go so far as to sign up on Wiki and edit pages, also including your sources, these "editors" will remove what you've done within hours.
> > >
> > > ~Weds
> > >
> > > --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How does someone become an 'editor' such as this Debs person on Wiki...? Should they not be completely neutral? Certainly Deb does not sound neutral. I find it all so very strange and baffling....Eileen
> > >
> >
>
>

Hi Wednesday...Its rather sad really :0)
On 8 Dec 2012, at 01:16, wednesday_mc wrote:

> Hi, Eileen.
>
> You're right in your definition. I submit for your consideration a somewhat ironic definition of "sock puppet," in that it comes from Wikipedia itself.
>
> "A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The termýa reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sockýoriginally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a third party or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer."
>
> More here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
>
> --- In , "EileenB" <b.eileen25@...> wrote:
> >
> > Wednesday...Well....Ive gone well and truely off Wiki now...What do you mean by 'sock puppet'...I presume sign in under a different name to back yourself up....haha...hilarious. These people seriously need to get a life...
> > Eileen
>
>