"Loyalty" by Matthew Lewis

Oh dear - don't buy it.
Was mildly irritated by constant descriptions of ladies with uncovered hair and wearing dresses with 'pinched in waists" and wide skirts - has he never seen a picture? More annoyed by his confusion and just wrongness about facts which are known, and anachronistic descriptions of behaviour, but I persevered. Then I find that Henry Tudor was held by the Duke of BURGUNDY, who might be persuaded to sell him.. Don't know if I can finish it. So glad I borrowed not bought it

I was bad. At least it was free on Kindle.
Ishita

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 5, 2012, at 12:42 PM, "favefauve@..." <favefauve@...> wrote:

> Oh dear - don't buy it.
> Was mildly irritated by constant descriptions of ladies with uncovered hair and wearing dresses with 'pinched in waists" and wide skirts - has he never seen a picture? More annoyed by his confusion and just wrongness about facts which are known, and anachronistic descriptions of behaviour, but I persevered. Then I find that Henry Tudor was held by the Duke of BURGUNDY, who might be persuaded to sell him.. Don't know if I can finish it. So glad I borrowed not bought it
>
>

--- In , "favefauve@..." <favefauve@...> wrote:
>
> Oh dear - don't buy it.
> Was mildly irritated by constant descriptions of ladies with uncovered hair and wearing dresses with 'pinched in waists" and wide skirts - has he never seen a picture? More annoyed by his confusion and just wrongness about facts which are known, and anachronistic descriptions of behaviour, but I persevered. Then I find that Henry Tudor was held by the Duke of BURGUNDY, who might be persuaded to sell him.. Don't know if I can finish it. So glad I borrowed not bought it
>


I'm sure the news from Leicester will provoke a big boom in fiction involving Richard III and his era. I wonder how long it will be before someone comes up with the idea of Margaret Beaufort and Bishop Morton being lovers as well as co-conspirators in the plot to put Henry Tudor on the throne?

Katy

Even I won't "go there," LoL. Real scary, kids.

Judy
 
Loyaulte me lie


________________________________
From: oregon_katy <oregon_katy@...>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Fiction WAS "Loyalty" by Matthew Lewis


 


--- In , "favefauve@..." <favefauve@...> wrote:
>
> Oh dear - don't buy it.
> Was mildly irritated by constant descriptions of ladies with uncovered hair and wearing dresses with 'pinched in waists" and wide skirts - has he never seen a picture? More annoyed by his confusion and just wrongness about facts which are known, and anachronistic descriptions of behaviour, but I persevered. Then I find that Henry Tudor was held by the Duke of BURGUNDY, who might be persuaded to sell him.. Don't know if I can finish it. So glad I borrowed not bought it
>

I'm sure the news from Leicester will provoke a big boom in fiction involving Richard III and his era. I wonder how long it will be before someone comes up with the idea of Margaret Beaufort and Bishop Morton being lovers as well as co-conspirators in the plot to put Henry Tudor on the throne?

Katy

Not a good one. At least it was free on kindle!
Reading The Broken Sword(was Some Touch of Pity) and cannot stop crying! It's a good book.
--- In , "favefauve@..." <favefauve@...> wrote:
>
> Oh dear - don't buy it.
> Was mildly irritated by constant descriptions of ladies with uncovered hair and wearing dresses with 'pinched in waists" and wide skirts - has he never seen a picture? More annoyed by his confusion and just wrongness about facts which are known, and anachronistic descriptions of behaviour, but I persevered. Then I find that Henry Tudor was held by the Duke of BURGUNDY, who might be persuaded to sell him.. Don't know if I can finish it. So glad I borrowed not bought it
>

Remembered another, "the Archbishop climbed into the pulpit and began the Mass". He must have had very long arms! Not even correct in 21st century terms. In a twisted way I have to admire someone who knows absolutely nothing about his subject but blithely writes a book...

Well I won't be caught out again like I was with The Kingmakers Daughter....It like pouring money down a drain. My fault...I should have taken a peek at it before purchasing. Hopefully my copy of this awful book will make a little money for the Cat Protection League where it ended up. Eileen

--- In , "oregon_katy" <oregon_katy@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In , "favefauve@" <favefauve@> wrote:
> >
> > Oh dear - don't buy it.
> > Was mildly irritated by constant descriptions of ladies with uncovered hair and wearing dresses with 'pinched in waists" and wide skirts - has he never seen a picture? More annoyed by his confusion and just wrongness about facts which are known, and anachronistic descriptions of behaviour, but I persevered. Then I find that Henry Tudor was held by the Duke of BURGUNDY, who might be persuaded to sell him.. Don't know if I can finish it. So glad I borrowed not bought it
> >
>
>
> I'm sure the news from Leicester will provoke a big boom in fiction involving Richard III and his era. I wonder how long it will be before someone comes up with the idea of Margaret Beaufort and Bishop Morton being lovers as well as co-conspirators in the plot to put Henry Tudor on the throne?
>
> Katy
>

Oy! I bought this book and immediately regretted it. But the stuff about Mass is funny! It's sort of like "bloopers" in movies. Maire.

--- In , P BARRETT <favefauve@...> wrote:
>
> Remembered another, "the Archbishop climbed into the pulpit and began the Mass". He must have had very long arms! Not even correct in 21st century terms. In a twisted way I have to admire someone who knows absolutely nothing about his subject but blithely writes a book...
>
>
>
>

Is anyone getting my feeds? I don't see my comments showing up anywhere.......




________________________________
From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Fiction WAS "Loyalty" by Matthew Lewis


 
Oy! I bought this book and immediately regretted it. But the stuff about Mass is funny! It's sort of like "bloopers" in movies. Maire.

--- In , P BARRETT <favefauve@...> wrote:
>
> Remembered another, "the Archbishop climbed into the pulpit and began the Mass". He must have had very long arms! Not even correct in 21st century terms. In a twisted way I have to admire someone who knows absolutely nothing about his subject but blithely writes a book...
>
>
>
>

No. You have donned the Coak Invisible, Ishita ;)

--- In , Ishita Bandyo <bandyoi@...> wrote:
>
> Is anyone getting my feeds? I don't see my comments showing up anywhere.......
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 10:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Fiction WAS "Loyalty" by Matthew Lewis
>
>
>  
> Oy! I bought this book and immediately regretted it. But the stuff about Mass is funny! It's sort of like "bloopers" in movies. Maire.
>
> --- In , P BARRETT <favefauve@> wrote:
> >
> > Remembered another, "the Archbishop climbed into the pulpit and began the Mass". He must have had very long arms! Not even correct in 21st century terms. In a twisted way I have to admire someone who knows absolutely nothing about his subject but blithely writes a book...
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

Hmm ! At least you got this one!
What should I do to get back into the gang?!

Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com

On Dec 6, 2012, at 3:00 PM, "blancsanglier1452" <blancsanglier1452@...> wrote:

> No. You have donned the Coak Invisible, Ishita ;)
>
> --- In , Ishita Bandyo <bandyoi@...> wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone getting my feeds? I don't see my comments showing up anywhere.......
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 10:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fiction WAS "Loyalty" by Matthew Lewis
> >
> >
> >
> > Oy! I bought this book and immediately regretted it. But the stuff about Mass is funny! It's sort of like "bloopers" in movies. Maire.
> >
> > --- In , P BARRETT <favefauve@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Remembered another, "the Archbishop climbed into the pulpit and began the Mass". He must have had very long arms! Not even correct in 21st century terms. In a twisted way I have to admire someone who knows absolutely nothing about his subject but blithely writes a book...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>