CBS blows it big time
CBS blows it big time
2013-02-04 15:53:41
"CBS This Morning" had the same reporter giving the same Tudor baloney about Richard "killing several relatives in the Tower of London" and added that the curved spine confirmed the legend of Richard's hunchback. He added with a pun on "hunch." I'm still steaming. Seems they ignored my e-mail after the original report.
Carol
Carol
Re: CBS blows it big time
2013-02-04 16:03:14
Carol earlier:
>
> "CBS This Morning" had the same reporter giving the same Tudor baloney about Richard "killing several relatives in the Tower of London" and added that the curved spine confirmed the legend of Richard's hunchback. He added with a pun on "hunch." I'm still steaming. Seems they ignored my e-mail after the original report.
Carol again:
I forgot to mention that, to add insult to injury, they showed the wrong skull, one with a missing front tooth!
Please, someone with some British historical credentials, say something to these morons, in particular the reporter, Mark Phillips.
Carol
>
> "CBS This Morning" had the same reporter giving the same Tudor baloney about Richard "killing several relatives in the Tower of London" and added that the curved spine confirmed the legend of Richard's hunchback. He added with a pun on "hunch." I'm still steaming. Seems they ignored my e-mail after the original report.
Carol again:
I forgot to mention that, to add insult to injury, they showed the wrong skull, one with a missing front tooth!
Please, someone with some British historical credentials, say something to these morons, in particular the reporter, Mark Phillips.
Carol
Re: CBS blows it big time
2013-02-04 16:11:16
Carol earlier:
>
> I forgot to mention that, to add insult to injury, they showed the wrong skull, one with a missing front tooth!
>
> Please, someone with some British historical credentials, say something to these morons, in particular the reporter, Mark Phillips.
>
Carol again:
Oops. I hadn't realized that the skull did have a front tooth missing. I guess it was the angle. I hope that was the tooth that they pulled for DNA analysis and not a tooth that was missing in life. And yet, what were they thinking to pull a *front* tooth? I guess we'll have to wait to see the facial reconstruction.
I'm still mad at CBS, but I was wrong on this one count.
Carol, wishing she could be celebrating instead of fearing for Richard's reputation in America, land of ignorant reporters who don't do their research and care more about the bleeping Super Bowl than the archaeological discovery of the century
>
> I forgot to mention that, to add insult to injury, they showed the wrong skull, one with a missing front tooth!
>
> Please, someone with some British historical credentials, say something to these morons, in particular the reporter, Mark Phillips.
>
Carol again:
Oops. I hadn't realized that the skull did have a front tooth missing. I guess it was the angle. I hope that was the tooth that they pulled for DNA analysis and not a tooth that was missing in life. And yet, what were they thinking to pull a *front* tooth? I guess we'll have to wait to see the facial reconstruction.
I'm still mad at CBS, but I was wrong on this one count.
Carol, wishing she could be celebrating instead of fearing for Richard's reputation in America, land of ignorant reporters who don't do their research and care more about the bleeping Super Bowl than the archaeological discovery of the century
Re: CBS blows it big time
2013-02-04 16:21:08
Carol, I am right there with you!!!
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, "justcarol67" <justcarol67@...> wrote:
> Carol earlier:
> >
> > I forgot to mention that, to add insult to injury, they showed the wrong skull, one with a missing front tooth!
> >
> > Please, someone with some British historical credentials, say something to these morons, in particular the reporter, Mark Phillips.
> >
> Carol again:
>
> Oops. I hadn't realized that the skull did have a front tooth missing. I guess it was the angle. I hope that was the tooth that they pulled for DNA analysis and not a tooth that was missing in life. And yet, what were they thinking to pull a *front* tooth? I guess we'll have to wait to see the facial reconstruction.
>
> I'm still mad at CBS, but I was wrong on this one count.
>
> Carol, wishing she could be celebrating instead of fearing for Richard's reputation in America, land of ignorant reporters who don't do their research and care more about the bleeping Super Bowl than the archaeological discovery of the century
>
>
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, "justcarol67" <justcarol67@...> wrote:
> Carol earlier:
> >
> > I forgot to mention that, to add insult to injury, they showed the wrong skull, one with a missing front tooth!
> >
> > Please, someone with some British historical credentials, say something to these morons, in particular the reporter, Mark Phillips.
> >
> Carol again:
>
> Oops. I hadn't realized that the skull did have a front tooth missing. I guess it was the angle. I hope that was the tooth that they pulled for DNA analysis and not a tooth that was missing in life. And yet, what were they thinking to pull a *front* tooth? I guess we'll have to wait to see the facial reconstruction.
>
> I'm still mad at CBS, but I was wrong on this one count.
>
> Carol, wishing she could be celebrating instead of fearing for Richard's reputation in America, land of ignorant reporters who don't do their research and care more about the bleeping Super Bowl than the archaeological discovery of the century
>
>
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.