Reburial
Reburial
Re: Reburial
It is far too Tudor centric, they won't allow re-examination of the bones in the Urn (I had hoped that would change after the arrival of a new Dean 6 years ago, but no) and most important of all, there is no flipping room for him. He'd be shoved in a corner with some worthy but obscure poet or someone. I don't know if you've ever visited but it is cluttered with tombs and memorials and the like. There are Kings of England buried in other places - Henry II and Richard I aren't even buried in Englant
I have to agree with you about Edward I though - dreadful man.
However, it's a moot point since it's already been decided that he stays in Leicester.
Liz
________________________________
From: "buttonbaz1@..." <buttonbaz1@...>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 13:26
Subject: Reburial
Despite Richard's affinity with York and the north the most appropriate final resting place for the king should be Westminster Abbey, together with other royalty. Whether or not he ordered the killing of the two princes should not be an issue as there are many rulers buried there of whom we have confirmation of their atrocities - Edward I comes immediately to mind.
Re: Reburial
Loyaulte me lie,
Johanne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Johanne L. Tournier
Email - jltournier60@...
or jltournier@...
"With God, all things are possible."
- Jesus of Nazareth
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of liz williams
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:28 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
I have to say in my opinion (and I love the Abbey and in my previous job worked there regularly ) but - anywhere but there!
It is far too Tudor centric, they won't allow re-examination of the bones in the Urn (I had hoped that would change after the arrival of a new Dean 6 years ago, but no) and most important of all, there is no flipping room for him. He'd be shoved in a corner with some worthy but obscure poet or someone. I don't know if you've ever visited but it is cluttered with tombs and memorials and the like. There are Kings of England buried in other places - Henry II and Richard I aren't even buried in Englant
I have to agree with you about Edward I though - dreadful man.
However, it's a moot point since it's already been decided that he stays in Leicester.
Liz
________________________________
From: "buttonbaz1@... <mailto:buttonbaz1%40ymail.com> " buttonbaz1@... <mailto:buttonbaz1%40ymail.com> >
To: <mailto:%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 13:26
Subject: Reburial
Despite Richard's affinity with York and the north the most appropriate final resting place for the king should be Westminster Abbey, together with other royalty. Whether or not he ordered the killing of the two princes should not be an issue as there are many rulers buried there of whom we have confirmation of their atrocities - Edward I comes immediately to mind.
Reburial
Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
(this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
Re: Reburial
Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
G
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey <lbaldrey@...> wrote:
> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
>
> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
>
>
>
>
Re: Reburial
On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
> G
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@...> wrote:
>
> > The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
> > Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
> > possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
> > (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
> > for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
> > in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
> > near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
> >
> > Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: Reburial
----- Original Message -----
From: louise baldrey
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 5:02 PM
Subject: Reburial
The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
(this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
Re: Reburial
However,
I will bet you a silver boar that this discussion will not end till he is finally laid to rest in Leicester Cathedral
George
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:31 PM, eileen bates <eileenbates147@...> wrote:
> I dont know why we keep getting posts about where Richard should be buried...it has been decided...He is going to be buried in Leicester Cathedral. End of.....Eileen
> On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
>
>> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
>> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
>> G
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@...> wrote:
>>
>>> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
>>> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
>>> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
>>> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
>>> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
>>> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
>>> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
>>>
>>> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Re: Reburial
--- In , George Butterfield wrote:
>
> True
> However,
> I will bet you a silver boar that this discussion will not end till he is finally laid to rest in Leicester Cathedral
> George
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:31 PM, eileen bates wrote:
>
> > I dont know why we keep getting posts about where Richard should be buried...it has been decided...He is going to be buried in Leicester Cathedral. End of.....Eileen
> > On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
> >
> >> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
> >> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
> >> G
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@...> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
> >>> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
> >>> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
> >>> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
> >>> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
> >>> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
> >>> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
> >>>
> >>> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Reburial
G
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, "mcjohn_wt_net" <mcjohn@...> wrote:
> [Grinning.] I'll set up the lawn chairs if y'all get the popcorn going. This is gonna be fun to watch. You can't get much farther away from the usurpin' crouchbacked baby-slaughterer than this, can you? Everybody wants the boy to move in with 'em!
>
> --- In , George Butterfield wrote:
> >
> > True
> > However,
> > I will bet you a silver boar that this discussion will not end till he is finally laid to rest in Leicester Cathedral
> > George
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:31 PM, eileen bates wrote:
> >
> > > I dont know why we keep getting posts about where Richard should be buried...it has been decided...He is going to be buried in Leicester Cathedral. End of.....Eileen
> > > On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
> > >
> > >> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
> > >> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
> > >> G
> > >>
> > >> Sent from my iPad
> > >>
> > >> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@...> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
> > >>> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
> > >>> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
> > >>> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
> > >>> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
> > >>> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
> > >>> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
> > >>>
> > >>> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: Reburial
You're always ready with helpful suggestions!
Johanne
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of George Butterfield
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 2:10 PM
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
Perhaps they could stage a historical rematch of Bosworth with those for and against York Westminster and Leicester just when the cathedral is winning one of the others could switch sides?
G
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, "mcjohn_wt_net" mcjohn@... <mailto:mcjohn%40oplink.net> > wrote:
> [Grinning.] I'll set up the lawn chairs if y'all get the popcorn going. This is gonna be fun to watch. You can't get much farther away from the usurpin' crouchbacked baby-slaughterer than this, can you? Everybody wants the boy to move in with 'em!
<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJkMWppb2c5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzU1Mjc3OTEEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1Mjk3MzMzBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxMzYwMDg3ODI2> Yahoo! Groups
Switch to: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Change%20Delivery%20Format:%20Traditional> Text-Only, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20Digest> Daily Digest " <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe> Unsubscribe " <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Use " <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Feedback%20on%20the%20redesigned%20individual%20mail%20v1> Send us Feedback
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=5527791/grpspId=1705297333/msgId=24030/stime=1360087826/nc1=5008817/nc2=4025321/nc3=3848621>
Re: Reburial
--- In , George Butterfield wrote:
>
> Perhaps they could stage a historical rematch of Bosworth with those for and against York Westminster and Leicester just when the cathedral is winning one of the others could switch sides?
> G
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:00 PM, "mcjohn_wt_net" wrote:
>
> > [Grinning.] I'll set up the lawn chairs if y'all get the popcorn going. This is gonna be fun to watch. You can't get much farther away from the usurpin' crouchbacked baby-slaughterer than this, can you? Everybody wants the boy to move in with 'em!
> >
> > --- In , George Butterfield wrote:
> > >
> > > True
> > > However,
> > > I will bet you a silver boar that this discussion will not end till he is finally laid to rest in Leicester Cathedral
> > > George
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> > >
> > > On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:31 PM, eileen bates wrote:
> > >
> > > > I dont know why we keep getting posts about where Richard should be buried...it has been decided...He is going to be buried in Leicester Cathedral. End of.....Eileen
> > > > On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
> > > >> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
> > > >> G
> > > >>
> > > >> Sent from my iPad
> > > >>
> > > >> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
> > > >>> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
> > > >>> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
> > > >>> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
> > > >>> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
> > > >>> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
> > > >>> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: Reburial
Paul
Richard Liveth Yet!
On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:31, eileen bates wrote:
> I dont know why we keep getting posts about where Richard should be buried...it has been decided...He is going to be buried in Leicester Cathedral. End of.....Eileen
> On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
>
>> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
>> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
>> G
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@...> wrote:
>>
>>> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
>>> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
>>> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
>>> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
>>> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
>>> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
>>> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
>>>
>>> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Re: Reburial
--- In , Paul Trevor Bale wrote:
>
> Thank you Eileen, glad somebody else was listening!
> Paul
>
> Richard Liveth Yet!
>
>
>
>
> On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:31, eileen bates wrote:
>
> > I dont know why we keep getting posts about where Richard should be buried...it has been decided...He is going to be buried in Leicester Cathedral. End of.....Eileen
> > On 5 Feb 2013, at 17:09, George Butterfield wrote:
> >
> >> Probably not Westminster.... Can you imagine the conversation between R3 and Shakespeare
> >> Surprised no one has mentioned St.Georges Chapel Windsor that would rattle lots of cages.
> >> G
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Feb 5, 2013, at 12:02 PM, louise baldrey lbaldrey@...> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The most fitting place for the reburial of Richard III would be Westminster
> >>> Abbey, where all the medieval kings are buried. However, if this is not
> >>> possible, *and*, as a catholic king, could he be buried in a monastery
> >>> (this is believed to have been his wish) where mass could be said regularly
> >>> for him. Therefore, what about the possibility of Mount St. Bernard's Abbey
> >>> in Leicestershire, a thriving, beautiful and modern Cistercian monastery
> >>> near to where he died ( see www.mountsaintbernard.org ).
> >>>
> >>> Derek Ruff, Wilden, near Bedford
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
Reburial
Leicester Cathedral wants him as he has been there for 500 years.
Here is a compromise:-
that he be buried at Mount St. Bernard's Abbey, Charnwood Forest, Leicestershire which is 8-9 miles from the city and Bosworth Field. In this way, the King's wishes would be honoured, i.e. in a monastery where the monks would say masses for him. The people of Leicester would then keep him within the county.
Derek Ruff, Wilden, Bedford
Re: Reburial
I totally agree with Westminster Abbey, no one has a better right to be buried here than poor Richard, the most detested monarch in English history for the past six hundred years. all those useless idiots who followed him have a lot more to answer for, especially the Tudors and the Stuarts. Lay him where he belongs.
________________________________
From: "buttonbaz1@..." <buttonbaz1@...>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, 13:26
Subject: Reburial
Despite Richard's affinity with York and the north the most appropriate final resting place for the king should be Westminster Abbey, together with other royalty. Whether or not he ordered the killing of the two princes should not be an issue as there are many rulers buried there of whom we have confirmation of their atrocities - Edward I comes immediately to mind.
Re: Reburial
Derek Ruff, Wilden, Bedfordshire
Reburial
Carol
Re: Reburial
Of course tracing their line back to Henry Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the Earl of Derby's ancestor for betraying his master and letting the bastard line to steal the throne from the real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@... [] wrote:
With the reburial so close at hand, I'm surprised that no one is discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear that the Duke of Gloucester and his wife will attend, along with the Countess of Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince Edward (of whom we Americans never hear anything, good or bad) won't be attending. I'd love to see the current royal family get a dose of true (non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
The Countess of Wessex’s descent is shown here:
http://www.genealogics.org/pedigree.php?personID=I00325642&tree=LEO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=12
From:
[mailto: ]
Sent: 27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society
Forum] Reburial
Don't know why anybody would want Edward there, but I
do think it significant that he isn't, and that his 'common born' wife is. No close
member of the Windsors
will therefore be attending, showing their real feelings for the last
Plantagenet.
Of course tracing their line back to Henry Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick
wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the Earl of Derby's ancestor for
betraying his master and letting the bastard line to steal the throne from the
real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to
the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am
understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@... [] wrote:
With the reburial so close at hand, I'm surprised that no one is
discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear that the Duke of Gloucester and his
wife will attend, along with the Countess of Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince
Edward (of whom we Americans never hear anything, good or bad) won't be
attending. I'd love to see the current royal family get a dose of true
(non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
From: "'Stephen' stephenmlark@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2015, 21:53
Subject: RE: Reburial
The Countess of Wessex's descent is shown here: http://www.genealogics.org/pedigree.php?personID=I00325642&tree=LEO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=12
From: [mailto: ]
Sent: 27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Reburial Don't know why anybody would want Edward there, but I do think it significant that he isn't, and that his 'common born' wife is. No close member of the Windsors will therefore be attending, showing their real feelings for the last Plantagenet.
Of course tracing their line back to Henry Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the Earl of Derby's ancestor for betraying his master and letting the bastard line to steal the throne from the real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@... [] wrote: With the reburial so close at hand, I'm surprised that no one is discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear that the Duke of Gloucester and his wife will attend, along with the Countess of Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince Edward (of whom we Americans never hear anything, good or bad) won't be attending. I'd love to see the current royal family get a dose of true (non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
JessFrom: Hilary Jones hjnatdat@... []
Sent: 27/02/2015 22:21
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
Trouble is Stephen if we all went to the trouble about 80% of us could claim the same. So lots of 'farm labourers' in 19th century Northants are descendants of Henry II or even before. It's the son of the younger son of the younger son syndrome. I share Paul's disappointment; I did think someone like Prince Harry might make it if only to give it the military connection. My guess is that it will used as a chance to celebrate those who died in battle in wars and to link in with WWI to make it acceptable . It's a snub for sure, or perhaps just cold feet? H
From: "'Stephen' stephenmlark@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2015, 21:53
Subject: RE: Reburial
The Countess of Wessex's descent is
shown here:
http://www.genealogics.org/pedigree.php?personID=I00325642&tree=LEO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=12
From:
[mailto: ]
Sent: 27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society
Forum] Reburial
Don't know why anybody would want Edward there, but I
do think it significant that he isn't, and that his 'common born' wife is. No close
member of the Windsors
will therefore be attending, showing their real feelings for the last
Plantagenet.
Of course tracing their line back to Henry Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick
wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the Earl of Derby's ancestor for
betraying his master and letting the bastard line to steal the throne from the
real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to
the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am
understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@...
[] wrote:
With the reburial so close at hand, I'm surprised that no one is
discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear that the Duke of Gloucester and his
wife will attend, along with the Countess of Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince
Edward (of whom we Americans never hear anything, good or bad) won't be
attending. I'd love to see the current royal family get a dose of true
(non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
I was told that tickets would be mailed out at the beginning of March, so there's no need for getting nervous yet In ten days or so, maybe.
Best wishes
Christine
----- Original Message -----
From: [mailto: ]
Sent: 27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Reburial <snip>
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am understandably nervous.
Paul
Re: Reburial
Sent from my iPad
On 27 Feb 2015, at 21:53, 'Stephen' stephenmlark@... [] <> wrote:
The Countess of Wessex's descent is shown here:
http://www.genealogics.org/pedigree.php?personID=I00325642&tree=LEO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=12
From:
[mailto: ]
Sent: 27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society
Forum] Reburial
Don't know why anybody would want Edward there, but I
do think it significant that he isn't, and that his 'common born' wife is. No close
member of the Windsors
will therefore be attending, showing their real feelings for the last
Plantagenet.
Of course tracing their line back to Henry Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick
wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the Earl of Derby's ancestor for
betraying his master and letting the bastard line to steal the throne from the
real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to
the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am
understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@... [] wrote:
With the reburial so close at hand, I'm surprised that no one is
discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear that the Duke of Gloucester and his
wife will attend, along with the Countess of Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince
Edward (of whom we Americans never hear anything, good or bad) won't be
attending. I'd love to see the current royal family get a dose of true
(non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
Sent from my iPad
On 27 Feb 2015, at 21:53, 'Stephen' stephenmlark@... [] <> wrote:
The Countess of Wessex's descent is shown here:
http://www.genealogics.org/pedigree.php?personID=I00325642&tree=LEO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=12
From:
[mailto: ]
Sent: 27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society
Forum] Reburial
Don't know why anybody would want Edward there, but I
do think it significant that he isn't, and that his 'common born' wife is. No close
member of the Windsors
will therefore be attending, showing their real feelings for the last
Plantagenet.
Of course tracing their line back to Henry Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick
wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the Earl of Derby's ancestor for
betraying his master and letting the bastard line to steal the throne from the
real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation from the Cathedral authorities to
the Society service I won a seat in the ballot for. Getting really close so am
understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@... [] wrote:
With the reburial so close at hand, I'm surprised that no one is
discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear that the Duke of Gloucester and his
wife will attend, along with the Countess of Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince
Edward (of whom we Americans never hear anything, good or bad) won't be
attending. I'd love to see the current royal family get a dose of true
(non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
Paul
On 28/02/2015 16:05, Jan Mulrenan janmulrenan@... [] wrote:
Jan here. My tickets for the buffet & the Middleham Requiem arrived today. I'm sure yours will be on the way.
Sent from my iPad
On 27 Feb 2015, at 21:53, 'Stephen' stephenmlark@... [] <> wrote:
The Countess of Wessex's descent is shown here:
http://www.genealogics.org/pedigree.php?personID=I00325642&tree=LEO&parentset=0&display=standard&generations=12
From:
[mailto: ]
Sent:
27 February 2015 21:25
To:
Subject:
Re: [Richard III Society
Forum] Reburial
Don't know why
anybody would want Edward there, but I
do think it significant that he isn't, and
that his 'common born' wife is. No close
member of the Windsors
will therefore be attending, showing their
real feelings for the last
Plantagenet.
Of course tracing their line back to Henry
Tudor their legitimacy hits a brick
wall, so no doubt they are grateful to the
Earl of Derby's ancestor for
betraying his master and letting the bastard
line to steal the throne from the
real royal family!
I think my continual upset about Richard's
fate is showing............
I am still waiting for my official invitation
from the Cathedral authorities to
the Society service I won a seat in the ballot
for. Getting really close so am
understandably nervous.
Paul
On 27/02/2015 17:31, justcarol67@... [] wrote:
With the reburial so close at hand,
I'm surprised that no one is
discussing that topic. I'm happy to hear
that the Duke of Gloucester and his
wife will attend, along with the Countess of
Essex. Too bad her husband, Prince
Edward (of whom we Americans never hear
anything, good or bad) won't be
attending. I'd love to see the current royal
family get a dose of true
(non-Tudorized) history.
Carol
Re: Reburial
Not going to the buffet or Requiem, as I'm making sure I am at home to watch the broadcast on my giant tv, [snip]
Carol responds:
Speaking of the broadcast, does anyone know whether the procession and any of the services will be broadcast on American TV (say, BBC America)? What, if anything, will we in the States be able to see? I don't want just the cursory coverage from CBS (especially after their blunder in mistaking Philippa Langley's description of Shakespeare's Richard for that of the historical king back when his skeleton was identified).
Carol
Re: Reburial
It is on Channel Four in the UK, which is not connected to the BBC.
From:
[mailto: ]
Sent: 28 February 2015 20:17
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society
Forum] Reburial
Paul
wrote :
Not going to the buffet or Requiem, as I'm making sure I am at home to watch
the broadcast on my giant tv, [snip]
Carol responds:
Speaking of the broadcast, does anyone know whether the procession and any of
the services will be broadcast on American TV (say, BBC America)? What, if
anything, will we in the States be able to see? I don't want just the cursory
coverage from CBS (especially after their blunder in mistaking Philippa
Langley's description of Shakespeare's Richard for that of the historical king
back when his skeleton was identified).
Carol
Re: Reburial
It is on Channel Four in the UK, which is not connected to the BBC.
Doug here:
Perhaps BBCAmerica will/could make some sort of deal with Channel 4? I know our Public Broadcasting stations have made deals with ITV in order to broadcast Poirot, so there's a precedent.
And hopefully there will be
some mention, with clips, on BBC News.
Re: Reburial
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
I didn't enter the ballot personally, but I will be glued to my large HD tv.
JessFrom: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 02/03/2015 12:24
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this
morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's
licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get
a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
Re: Reburial
Gilda
On Mar 2, 2015, at 7:24 AM, Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... [] wrote:
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
Does that mean you had to decline the invitation or that you could pass it to someone of your choice, Gilda?
Thanks for the clarification. Mac
Re: Reburial
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak.Omega meaning last, of course!J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
Apologies,Ron.
From: RONALD COOKSLEY <greyfox.cooksley@...>
To: "" <>
Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015, 8:14
Subject: Re: Reburial
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak.Omega meaning last, of course!J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me! Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can. Am I lucky or what? Paul
Re: Reburial
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested in seeing the coffin laid in the church are kicked out around 5 in order to prepare for the service then it should be good. Don't know yet but I may even stay inside the cathedral to await the service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 08:14, RONALD COOKSLEY greyfox.cooksley@... [] wrote:
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015, 8:53
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite had arrived. That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested in seeing the coffin laid in the church are kicked out around 5 in order to prepare for the service then it should be good. Don't know yet but I may even stay inside the cathedral to await the service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 08:14, RONALD COOKSLEY greyfox.cooksley@... [] wrote:
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" mailto:
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me! Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can. Am I lucky or what? Paul
Re: Reburial
If anyone had suggested such a thing a few years ago we would have been aghast.
I think now it is actually here it will be very emotional for us all.
The enormity of what we have achieved will really hit us.
Jess xFrom: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 03/03/2015 08:53
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite had arrived.
That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no point
anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested in seeing the
coffin laid in the church are kicked out around 5 in order to
prepare for the service then it should be good. Don't know yet but I
may even stay inside the cathedral to await the service if allowed
after visiting the king.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 08:14, RONALD COOKSLEY
greyfox.cooksley@... [] wrote:
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he
thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and
black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be
queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the
crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak.
Omega meaning last, of course!
J.
From: "Paul
Trevor Bale bale475@...
[]"
<>
To:
Sent:
Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject:
Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester
Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the
request I bring a passport or Driver's licence
along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am
there on the dot to get a seat as close to the
king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
From: "Janjovian janjovian@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015, 11:16
Subject: RE: Reburial
I find it sends a shiver down my spine thinking about you actually being there to attend the burial ceremonies of King Richard III.
If anyone had suggested such a thing a few years ago we would have been aghast.
I think now it is actually here it will be very emotional for us all.
The enormity of what we have achieved will really hit us.
Jess x
From: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 03/03/2015 08:53
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite had arrived. That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested in seeing the coffin laid in the church are kicked out around 5 in order to prepare for the service then it should be good. Don't know yet but I may even stay inside the cathedral to await the service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 08:14, RONALD COOKSLEY greyfox.cooksley@... [] wrote:
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
And yes, we owe Philippa's doggedness and John's knowledge a huge debt.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 11:16, Janjovian janjovian@... [] wrote:
I find it sends a shiver down my spine thinking about you actually being there to attend the burial ceremonies of King Richard III.
If anyone had suggested such a thing a few years ago we would have been aghast.
I think now it is actually here it will be very emotional for us all.
The enormity of what we have achieved will really hit us.
Jess x From: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 03/03/2015 08:53
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite had
arrived. That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no
point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested
in seeing the coffin laid in the church are kicked out around
5 in order to prepare for the service then it should be good.
Don't know yet but I may even stay inside the cathedral to
await the service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
Gilda
On Mar 2, 2015, at 1:22 PM, mac.thirty@... [] wrote:
Does that mean you had to decline the invitation or that you could pass it to someone of your choice, Gilda?
Thanks for the clarification. Mac
Re: Reburial
Judy Loyaulte me lie
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 12:02 PM, "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <> wrote:
How do you think I feel Jess? I have no idea how I will react being so close to him again.
And yes, we owe Philippa's doggedness and John's knowledge a huge debt.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 11:16, Janjovian janjovian@... [] wrote:
I find it sends a shiver down my spine thinking about you actually being there to attend the burial ceremonies of King Richard III.
If anyone had suggested such a thing a few years ago we would have been aghast.
I think now it is actually here it will be very emotional for us all.
The enormity of what we have achieved will really hit us.
Jess x From: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 03/03/2015 08:53
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite had arrived. That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested in seeing the coffin laid in the church are kicked out around 5 in order to prepare for the service then it should be good. Don't know yet but I may even stay inside the cathedral to await the service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
On 03/03/2015 08:14, RONALD COOKSLEY greyfox.cooksley@... [] wrote:
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
On Mar 3, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... [] <> wrote:
How do you think I feel Jess? I have no idea how I will react being so close to him again.
And yes, we owe Philippa's doggedness and John's knowledge a huge debt.
Paul
I find it sends a shiver down my spine thinking about you actually being there to attend the burial ceremonies of King Richard III.
If anyone had suggested such a thing a few years ago we would have been aghast.
I think now it is actually here it will be very emotional for us all.
The enormity of what we have achieved will really hit us.
Jess x From: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 03/03/2015 08:53
To:
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite had arrived. That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would be no point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If all interested in seeing the coffin laid in the church are kicked out around 5 in order to prepare for the service then it should be good. Don't know yet
but I may even stay inside the cathedral to await the service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
Paul
On 03/03/2015 20:10, Pamela Bain pbain@... [] wrote:
This is a tribute to RICHARD III, and also those who have studied, read, written, and persevered for so many years to actually fund and find the body, and now a procession "fitting" a King as well as possible. Many feel more could and should be done, but at least we have what we have. Paul, as our eyes and ears, we are waiting for reports!
On Mar 3, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... [] <> wrote:
How do you think I feel Jess? I have no idea how I will
react being so close to him again.
And yes, we owe Philippa's doggedness and John's knowledge
a huge debt.
Paul
I find it sends a shiver down my spine thinking about you actually being there to attend the burial ceremonies of King Richard III.
If anyone had suggested such a thing a few years ago we would have been aghast.
I think now it is actually here it will be very emotional for us all.
The enormity of what we have achieved will really hit us.
Jess x From: Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []
Sent: 03/03/2015 08:53
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Reburial
Panic meant it is getting really close and no invite
had arrived. That was me panicking!
As for crowd, only 200 are allowed in so there would
be no point anybody else waiting around. I hope. If
all interested in seeing the coffin laid in the church
are kicked out around 5 in order to prepare for the
service then it should be good. Don't know yet but I
may even stay inside the cathedral to await the
service if allowed after visiting the king.
Paul
Here you are! The 'panic over' bit refers to the fact he thought they'd picked up on something he'd posted and black-balled him!
It's no use being there 'on the dot' ...there will be queues too presumably.
I think the only justification for a new coin is the crown/tiara like the 1952 one. Alpha and Omega, so to speak. Omega meaning last, of course! J.
From: "Paul Trevor Bale bale475@... []" <>
To:
Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015, 12:24
Subject: Re: Reburial
Panic over. My invitation from Leicester Cathedral arrived this morning, along with the request I bring a passport or Driver's licence along with me!
Doors open at 6p.m so I will make sure I am there on the dot to get a seat as close to the king as I can.
Am I lucky or what?
Paul
Re: Reburial
Mary
Re: Reburial
Nance Crawford, President
California Writers Club-San Fernando Valley Branch www.cwc-sfv.org
www.NanceCrawford.com
Reburial
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/richard-iii-the-reburial?hootPostID=fcdf6e212d8729e27555c14f21ba9196
Gilda