Tomb design rejected?

Note: You'll have to cut and paste the following links into your preferred browser.

Here's the latest on the issue of King Richard's tomb at Leicester Cathedral

http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/Richard-III-Tomb-design-does-meet-Leicester/story-18391233-detail/story.html#axzz2NJtwd1O4

This link gives you the comments in the House of Commons on 7 March about the burial of the king.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130307/debtext/130307-0001.htm#13030784000048

On Tuesday 12 March (today) there was an Adjournment debate*, held in Westminster Hall, at 11 am. Following discussion about the reburial of Richard III in the Commons on 7 March and the concerns of Hugh Bayley (MP for York Central) it was agreed that the debate should take place regarding the terms of the Exhumation Licence granted to the University of Leicester Archaeological Department.

This debate can be viewed here: http://www.parliamentlive.tv/main/Player.aspx?meetingId=12784

The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!

Regards,
Tracy

Oh good grief..... I think I have said enough.

________________________________
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of tracyb_ca
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:11 AM
To:
Subject: Tomb design rejected?



Note: You'll have to cut and paste the following links into your preferred browser.

Here's the latest on the issue of King Richard's tomb at Leicester Cathedral

http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/Richard-III-Tomb-design-does-meet-Leicester/story-18391233-detail/story.html#axzz2NJtwd1O4

This link gives you the comments in the House of Commons on 7 March about the burial of the king.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmhansrd/cm130307/debtext/130307-0001.htm#13030784000048

On Tuesday 12 March (today) there was an Adjournment debate*, held in Westminster Hall, at 11 am. Following discussion about the reburial of Richard III in the Commons on 7 March and the concerns of Hugh Bayley (MP for York Central) it was agreed that the debate should take place regarding the terms of the Exhumation Licence granted to the University of Leicester Archaeological Department.

This debate can be viewed here: http://www.parliamentlive.tv/main/Player.aspx?meetingId=12784

The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!

Regards,
Tracy

Especially when the York MPs kept saying Richard had said he wanted to be buried in York and when challenged (because it is not true) had no real answer.


________________________________
tracyb_ca <tbryce@...> wrote:
 (Snip)

The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!

Regards,
Tracy

Richard causing troubles for Parliament yet again! That's my bonny boy! Maire.
--- In , Pamela Furmidge <pamela.furmidge@...> wrote:
>
> Especially when the York MPs kept saying Richard had said he wanted to be buried in York and when challenged (because it is not true) had no real answer.
>
>
> ________________________________
> tracyb_ca <tbryce@...> wrote:
>  (Snip)
>
> The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!
>
> Regards,
> Tracy
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes the debate Chair (I think it was Chris Patten we only got a glimpse) concluded by saying with great feeling 'Poor Richard, as controversial in death as in life.'



________________________________
From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013, 16:54
Subject: Re: Tomb design rejected?

 

Richard causing troubles for Parliament yet again! That's my bonny boy! Maire.
--- In , Pamela Furmidge <pamela.furmidge@...> wrote:
>
> Especially when the York MPs kept saying Richard had said he wanted to be buried in York and when challenged (because it is not true) had no real answer.
>
>
> ________________________________
> tracyb_ca <tbryce@...> wrote:
>  (Snip)
>
> The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!
>
> Regards,
> Tracy
>
>
>
>
>
>

The Chair was Edward Leigh, MP for Gainsborough.

--- In , Hilary Jones <hjnatdat@...> wrote:
>
> Yes the debate Chair (I think it was Chris Patten we only got a glimpse) concluded by saying with great feeling 'Poor Richard, as controversial in death as in life.'
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013, 16:54
> Subject: Re: Tomb design rejected?
>
>  
>
> Richard causing troubles for Parliament yet again! That's my bonny boy! Maire.
> --- In , Pamela Furmidge <pamela.furmidge@> wrote:
> >
> > Especially when the York MPs kept saying Richard had said he wanted to be buried in York and when challenged (because it is not true) had no real answer.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > tracyb_ca <tbryce@> wrote:
> >  (Snip)
> >
> > The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tracy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

Thanks. I missed the first few minutes so didn't get the intros.



________________________________
From: colyngbourne <[email protected]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 13 March 2013, 10:28
Subject: Re: Tomb design rejected?

 

The Chair was Edward Leigh, MP for Gainsborough.

--- In , Hilary Jones <hjnatdat@...> wrote:
>
> Yes the debate Chair (I think it was Chris Patten we only got a glimpse) concluded by saying with great feeling 'Poor Richard, as controversial in death as in life.'
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013, 16:54
> Subject: Re: Tomb design rejected?
>
>  
>
> Richard causing troubles for Parliament yet again! That's my bonny boy! Maire.
> --- In , Pamela Furmidge <pamela.furmidge@> wrote:
> >
> > Especially when the York MPs kept saying Richard had said he wanted to be buried in York and when challenged (because it is not true) had no real answer.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > tracyb_ca <tbryce@> wrote:
> > à(Snip)
> >
> > The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tracy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

No it was Edward Leigh.

--- In , Hilary Jones <hjnatdat@...> wrote:
>
> Yes the debate Chair (I think it was Chris Patten we only got a glimpse) concluded by saying with great feeling 'Poor Richard, as controversial in death as in life.'
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: mairemulholland <mairemulholland@...>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 March 2013, 16:54
> Subject: Re: Tomb design rejected?
>
>  
>
> Richard causing troubles for Parliament yet again! That's my bonny boy! Maire.
> --- In , Pamela Furmidge <pamela.furmidge@> wrote:
> >
> > Especially when the York MPs kept saying Richard had said he wanted to be buried in York and when challenged (because it is not true) had no real answer.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > tracyb_ca <tbryce@> wrote:
> >  (Snip)
> >
> > The relevant debate starts at the 1:30:20 mark on the timeline below the video. It is approximately 30 minutes long. Hugh Bayley proposes that the decision on where to bury King Richard is a decision to be made by the government, and not the academics from Leicester. It's interesting to watch politicians struggle with history!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tracy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>