Another poll
Another poll
2013-03-20 15:40:55
The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
Carol
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
Carol
Re: Another poll
2013-03-20 15:44:01
I just voted, and York is way ahead..... I love all the information in this morning's posts, from everyone. There is a lot of information and it is much appreciated.
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of justcarol67
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:41 AM
To:
Subject: Another poll
The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
Carol
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of justcarol67
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:41 AM
To:
Subject: Another poll
The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
Carol
Re: Another poll
2013-03-20 16:22:33
I thought about voting but decided against it. I don't want to favour *any* site at the moment. I just want everyone to sit down together, talk through the issues and accept that it's about more than regionalism and tourism. I don't think anyone's particularly grasped that yet, what with Leicester's planned museum being countered by York's Richard-fest.
I see the BBC's 'Question Time' is being broadcast from York tomorrow. What are the odds on the subject being (a) raised and (b) treated as more than the end-of-programme novelty question?
Jonathan
________________________________
From: justcarol67 <justcarol67@...>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 15:40
Subject: Another poll
The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
Carol
I see the BBC's 'Question Time' is being broadcast from York tomorrow. What are the odds on the subject being (a) raised and (b) treated as more than the end-of-programme novelty question?
Jonathan
________________________________
From: justcarol67 <justcarol67@...>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 15:40
Subject: Another poll
The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
Carol
Re: Another poll
2013-03-20 16:43:57
Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
A J
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <justcarol67@...> wrote:
> **
>
>
> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
>
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
>
> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
>
> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
>
> Carol
>
>
>
re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
A J
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <justcarol67@...> wrote:
> **
>
>
> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
>
>
> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
>
> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
>
> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
>
> Carol
>
>
>
Re: Another poll
2013-03-20 19:33:15
Another Car Park? Seriously! They need to be a little more respectful. I will vote ( who should I vote for?!!).
Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:43 PM, A J Hibbard <ajhibbard@...> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
> re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
> can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
>
> A J
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <justcarol67@...> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
>> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
>>
>>
>> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
>>
>> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
>> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
>>
>> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
>> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
>> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
>>
>> Carol
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:43 PM, A J Hibbard <ajhibbard@...> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
> re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
> can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
>
> A J
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <justcarol67@...> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
>> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
>>
>>
>> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
>>
>> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
>> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
>>
>> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
>> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
>> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
>>
>> Carol
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Re: Another poll
2013-03-20 21:27:04
Having read the Independent poll like some of you it seems to ask where the "crooked backed Richard III" is to be buried.
People I've been talking to don't understand who the paper's talking about, and I have to say I agree. We know they've just found King Richard III [who had scoliosis which isn't crooked backed but one shoulder higher than the other, sometimes.....]. Is there another Richard III somewhere we haven't heard about? France maybe? I know there was a Norman Duke Richard III, could they possibley have discovered him? Perhaps we should clarify it with them before we vote? I shall be asking Mark Omrod a similar question about his 'hunchback walking with a stoop' description in History Magazine. H.
________________________________
From: Ishita Bandyo <bandyoi@...>
To: "" <>
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 19:33
Subject: Re: Another poll
Another Car Park? Seriously! They need to be a little more respectful. I will vote ( who should I vote for?!!).
Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:43 PM, A J Hibbard <mailto:ajhibbard%40gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
> re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
> can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
>
> A J
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <mailto:justcarol67%40yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
>> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
>>
>>
>> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
>>
>> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
>> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
>>
>> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
>> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
>> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
>>
>> Carol
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
People I've been talking to don't understand who the paper's talking about, and I have to say I agree. We know they've just found King Richard III [who had scoliosis which isn't crooked backed but one shoulder higher than the other, sometimes.....]. Is there another Richard III somewhere we haven't heard about? France maybe? I know there was a Norman Duke Richard III, could they possibley have discovered him? Perhaps we should clarify it with them before we vote? I shall be asking Mark Omrod a similar question about his 'hunchback walking with a stoop' description in History Magazine. H.
________________________________
From: Ishita Bandyo <bandyoi@...>
To: "" <>
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 19:33
Subject: Re: Another poll
Another Car Park? Seriously! They need to be a little more respectful. I will vote ( who should I vote for?!!).
Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:43 PM, A J Hibbard <mailto:ajhibbard%40gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
> re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
> can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
>
> A J
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <mailto:justcarol67%40yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
>> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
>>
>>
>> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
>>
>> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
>> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
>>
>> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
>> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
>> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
>>
>> Carol
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Re: Another poll
2013-03-20 21:47:21
Exactly!
Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
On Mar 20, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Hilary Jones <hjnatdat@...> wrote:
> Having read the Independent poll like some of you it seems to ask where the "crooked backed Richard III" is to be buried.
> People I've been talking to don't understand who the paper's talking about, and I have to say I agree. We know they've just found King Richard III [who had scoliosis which isn't crooked backed but one shoulder higher than the other, sometimes.....]. Is there another Richard III somewhere we haven't heard about? France maybe? I know there was a Norman Duke Richard III, could they possibley have discovered him? Perhaps we should clarify it with them before we vote? I shall be asking Mark Omrod a similar question about his 'hunchback walking with a stoop' description in History Magazine. H.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ishita Bandyo <bandyoi@...>
> To: ">
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 19:33
> Subject: Re: Another poll
>
>
>
>
> Another Car Park? Seriously! They need to be a little more respectful. I will vote ( who should I vote for?!!).
>
> Ishita Bandyo
> www.ishitabandyo.com
> www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
> www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:43 PM, A J Hibbard <mailto:ajhibbard%40gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
> > re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
> > can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
> >
> > A J
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <mailto:justcarol67%40yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> **
> >>
> >>
> >> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
> >> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
> >>
> >> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
> >> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
> >>
> >> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
> >> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
> >> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
> >>
> >> Carol
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Ishita Bandyo
www.ishitabandyo.com
www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
On Mar 20, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Hilary Jones <hjnatdat@...> wrote:
> Having read the Independent poll like some of you it seems to ask where the "crooked backed Richard III" is to be buried.
> People I've been talking to don't understand who the paper's talking about, and I have to say I agree. We know they've just found King Richard III [who had scoliosis which isn't crooked backed but one shoulder higher than the other, sometimes.....]. Is there another Richard III somewhere we haven't heard about? France maybe? I know there was a Norman Duke Richard III, could they possibley have discovered him? Perhaps we should clarify it with them before we vote? I shall be asking Mark Omrod a similar question about his 'hunchback walking with a stoop' description in History Magazine. H.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ishita Bandyo <bandyoi@...>
> To: ">
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2013, 19:33
> Subject: Re: Another poll
>
>
>
>
> Another Car Park? Seriously! They need to be a little more respectful. I will vote ( who should I vote for?!!).
>
> Ishita Bandyo
> www.ishitabandyo.com
> www.facebook.com/ishitabandyofinearts
> www.ishitabandyoarts.blogspot.com
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:43 PM, A J Hibbard <mailto:ajhibbard%40gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the link. Regardless of your feeling about where Richard is
> > re-buried, I do think it's important to vote, so that the powers that be
> > can judge the level of interest in getting this right.
> >
> > A J
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:40 AM, justcarol67 <mailto:justcarol67%40yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> **
> >>
> >>
> >> The Independent has a poll (possibly tongue in cheek) on where "the
> >> crooked backed" Richard III should be buried.
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/poll-where-should-richard-iii-be-interred-8540656.html
> >>
> >> The options are Leicester, York, Gloucester, Durham (which has evidently
> >> put in a bid), and (ugh) another car park.
> >>
> >> I wasn't sure whether to vote or not but because I'm irritated with all
> >> parties right now, including the Independent, I voted for Gloucester. At
> >> least they haven't rejected or insulted him.
> >>
> >> Carol
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.