SECOND ATTEMPT

Apologies for cluttering up mailboxes - the attachment didn't materialise as expected!


I am trying a shortcut by attaching a scan of Oliver Kamm's article on
the king, rather than type out the whole article & put myself in
breach of copyright.  Perhaps I have already breached it.  I plan to
reply to this sweeping dismissal soon.  Going on other e-mails given at
the end of Times columns I hope okamm@... will reach him. This
appeared two days ago, I think.

Jan.

I think Neil has set up this list to not send any attachments to members due to the possibility of viruses?

~Weds


On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:00 PM, J MULRENAN <janmulrenan@...> wrote:
 

Apologies for cluttering up mailboxes - the attachment didn't materialise as expected!

I am trying a shortcut by attaching a scan of Oliver Kamm's article on
the king, rather than type out the whole article & put myself in
breach of copyright.  Perhaps I have already breached it.  I plan to
reply to this sweeping dismissal soon.  Going on other e-mails given at
the end of Times columns I hope okamm@... will reach him. This
appeared two days ago, I think.

Jan.

--
Friend: Are you upset about the outcome of the election? Me: I'm upset about the outcome of the War of the Roses.

Jan wrote:

Apologies for cluttering up mailboxes - the attachment didn't materialise as expected!

I am trying a shortcut by attaching a scan of Oliver Kamm's article on
the king, rather than type out the whole article & put myself in
breach of copyright. Perhaps I have already breached it. I plan to
reply to this sweeping dismissal soon. Going on other e-mails given at
the end of Times columns I hope okamm@... will reach him. This
appeared two days ago, I think.

Carol responds:

Apologies if someone has already mentioned this. Attachments don't work in Yahoo groups (at least, they didn't in the old format). Have you tried uploading it to our files?

Carol