Those Staffords again
Those Staffords again
2004-05-06 10:38:25
The Buckingham duchy was revived by the early 17th century. Was the new Duke (James I's favourite) related to the Staffords or was it a clean break?
Re: Those Staffords again
2004-05-06 16:07:39
--- In , "Stephen Lark"
<smlark@t...> wrote:
> The Buckingham duchy was revived by the early 17th century. Was
the new Duke (James I's favourite) related to the Staffords or was
it a clean break?
>
>
Clean break I believe. Villiers was a member of the gentry rather
than nobility. However I can doublr check in case there was an
obscure link, but the book is at work...
B
<smlark@t...> wrote:
> The Buckingham duchy was revived by the early 17th century. Was
the new Duke (James I's favourite) related to the Staffords or was
it a clean break?
>
>
Clean break I believe. Villiers was a member of the gentry rather
than nobility. However I can doublr check in case there was an
obscure link, but the book is at work...
B
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Those Staffords again
2004-05-06 17:07:50
> The Buckingham duchy was revived by the early 17th century. Was the new Duke
> (James I's favourite) related to the Staffords or was it a clean break?
>
George Villiers was the new Duke, a common lad who James had taken a fancy
to. No connection with any noble family as far as I know, certainly not the
Staffords.
Paul
> (James I's favourite) related to the Staffords or was it a clean break?
>
George Villiers was the new Duke, a common lad who James had taken a fancy
to. No connection with any noble family as far as I know, certainly not the
Staffords.
Paul