A child king dead in 1483

A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-16 18:19:22
pansydobersby

I don't know if Maria has written about this at some point, but in the course of my own little investigations I looked into the affairs of the Foix family and came across a rather surprising story I'd never heard before.


King Francis of Navarre (known also as Francois Phébus), son of Gaston de Foix and Eleanor of Navarre, was a child king who died in January 1483 at the age of 16. It was widely believed he was poisoned. (The traditional story seems to be that the boy played a poisoned flute.)


Jean de Foix, Viscount Narbonne, was the young king's& wait for it& paternal uncle. After the boy's death, Jean usurped - or at least attempted to usurp - the throne of Navarre, though eventually he failed and the throne went to the boy's sister Catherine after all.


Jean was chummy with Louis XI, by the way, and with later kings of France too.


My first thoughts on reading this were:

(a) There seemed to be quite a few 'wicked uncles' about, didn't there?

(b) The time period right before and right after Louis XI's death was an especially risky time to be a young king or heir to the throne&


Also makes you wonder:

(a) Just how extensively planned were these French-sponsored coups d'état? The French obviously supported those candidates to neighbouring thrones who posed less of a risk to France in its transition period, but did their policy extend to actively eliminating riskier candidates?

(b) Just how much did the story of this other 'usurper uncle' of 1483 affect the legend of Richard?


Would be interesting to find out more about this story, though I've yet to find a book (in English or French) dealing with this subject in more detail. I'm guessing Maria has more information?


Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-16 20:14:00
Maria Torres
How interesting! I don't know Francis, and it'll be fascinating to do some digging.
I can, however, fill in a couple of dots about his paternal ancestry:
His father was Gaston de Foix. Gaston's mother was Leonor of Navarre, whose father was Juan II of Aragon. This made Leonor the half-sister of Fernando of Aragon, husband of Isabel the Catholic.
Interestingly about Francis' grandmother Leonor is that she's suspected of poisoning her elder sister, Blanca: Blanca was married to Enrique IV of Castile for 13 years, but the marriage was never consummated. In 1453, the match was annulled, Enrique embarked on his disastrous marriage to Juana of Portugal (not "our" Joana) and Blanca returned to Navarre. She was incarcerated by her father Juan II and by Leonor.
The brother of Leonor and Blanca, Carlos Prince of Viana, was engaged in a war for Navarre against Papa Juan. Carlos was much more popular with the Navarrese than Papa Juan, and when Carlos died, possibly of TB, Blanca inherited his title and his popularity. She died of poison in 1464, and the title passed to Leonor who, wisely, didn't press her claim till Papa Juan died in 1479.
("Prince of Viana" is, for Navarre, the equivalent of "Prince of Wales" in England, and, incidentally, "Prince of Asturias" for Castile).
Leonor herself died that same year, and so Francis (Francois from on, for me) inherited this extremely uneasy crown at either the age of 10 or the age of 13, depending on whether he was born in 1466 or 1469 (Wikipedia is being contradictory here):
Taking a quick spin through Wikipedia, I find the following interesting detail:
The mother of Francis was Magdalene of Valois. Her parents were Charles VII of France and Marie of Anjou. Magdalene was the youngest of Louis XI's sisters; she was Francois' regent and also the regent for daughter Catherine, who inherited the title after Francois' death in 1483. Magdalene died, a hostage of Fernando of Aragon, in 1494.
Jean of Navarre, our wicked uncle, was Leonor's third son. He was born in 1450 and died in 1500. Eldest brother Gaston, Francois' father, was born in 1444 and died in 1470. In 1483, he based his claim to Navarre on the basis of being nearest male heir. Navarre didn't observe Salic Law and Catherine won the conflict in 1497. Wikipedia confirms Jean was on good terms with Louis XI and Louis XII. He married Marie of Orleans, sister to Louis XII (his daughter, Germaine, would be the second wife of Fernando of Aragon).
Gaston, father of Francois, was born in 1444 and died as a result of a jousting accident in 1470. He was Prince of Navarre, but died before he succeeded to the throne.
So the very violent and tangled line of succession in this short period of Navarre is this:
Charles III of Navarre (1361-1425) His daughter, Blanca I was the wife of
Juan II of Aragon (1398-1479) who fought for the crown of Navarre against
Carlos IV Prince of Viana (1421-1461), and his son; and possibly got rid of
Blanca II (1424-1464), and his daughter; and who was briefly succeeded by
Leonor (1426-1479), his daughter. Who, after she died, was succeeded by
Francois (1466/69?-1483), her grandson, because her son Gaston had died in 1470; and Francois was succeeded by his sister
Catalina/Catherine (1468-1517); and who owed her succession to their regent mother
Magdalene of Valois (1443-1495), who stood up against the claims of
Jean de Foix (1450-1500), who apparently had the alliance of Louis XI despite the fact that Magdelene was Louis' sister.
Definitely bears investigation, especially when you consider that Louis XI was dying in 1483 and would be dead in August. Much though it pains me, I have to try to see things from Louis' point of view, remembering that the Hundred Year War had ended only about 30 years previously; that much of his energy was directed against Burgundy and that he was undoubtedly trying make things as stable as possible for his own posterity- his own son would be a minor, so there was plenty for Louis to have to bulwark for him.
Much rushed,
Mariaejbronte@...





On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:19 PM, pansydobersby <[email protected]> wrote:

I don't know if Maria has written about this at some point, but in the course of my own little investigations I looked into the affairs of the Foix family and came across a rather surprising story I'd never heard before.


King Francis of Navarre (known also as Francois Phébus), son of Gaston de Foix and Eleanor of Navarre, was a child king who died in January 1483 at the age of 16. It was widely believed he was poisoned. (The traditional story seems to be that the boy played a poisoned flute.)


Jean de Foix, Viscount Narbonne, was the young king's… wait for it… paternal uncle. After the boy's death, Jean usurped - or at least attempted to usurp - the throne of Navarre, though eventually he failed and the throne went to the boy's sister Catherine after all.


Jean was chummy with Louis XI, by the way, and with later kings of France too.


My first thoughts on reading this were:

(a) There seemed to be quite a few 'wicked uncles' about, didn't there?

(b) The time period right before and right after Louis XI's death was an especially risky time to be a young king or heir to the throne…


Also makes you wonder:

(a) Just how extensively planned were these French-sponsored coups d'état? The French obviously supported those candidates to neighbouring thrones who posed less of a risk to France in its transition period, but did their policy extend to actively eliminating riskier candidates?

(b) Just how much did the story of this other 'usurper uncle' of 1483 affect the legend of Richard?


Would be interesting to find out more about this story, though I've yet to find a book (in English or French) dealing with this subject in more detail. I'm guessing Maria has more information?


Pansy


Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-16 20:29:04
SandraMachin
That's truly interesting, Maria. And so many major players that it almost makes our WOTR seem sparsely populated. Sandra =^..^= From: Maria Torres Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 8:13 PM To: Subject: Re: A child king dead in 1483

How interesting! I don't know Francis, and it'll be fascinating to do some digging. I can, however, fill in a couple of dots about his paternal ancestry: His father was Gaston de Foix. Gaston's mother was Leonor of Navarre, whose father was Juan II of Aragon. This made Leonor the half-sister of Fernando of Aragon, husband of Isabel the Catholic. Interestingly about Francis' grandmother Leonor is that she's suspected of poisoning her elder sister, Blanca: Blanca was married to Enrique IV of Castile for 13 years, but the marriage was never consummated. In 1453, the match was annulled, Enrique embarked on his disastrous marriage to Juana of Portugal (not "our" Joana) and Blanca returned to Navarre. She was incarcerated by her father Juan II and by Leonor. The brother of Leonor and Blanca, Carlos Prince of Viana, was engaged in a war for Navarre against Papa Juan. Carlos was much more popular with the Navarrese than Papa Juan, and when Carlos died, possibly of TB, Blanca inherited his title and his popularity. She died of poison in 1464, and the title passed to Leonor who, wisely, didn't press her claim till Papa Juan died in 1479. ("Prince of Viana" is, for Navarre, the equivalent of "Prince of Wales" in England, and, incidentally, "Prince of Asturias" for Castile). Leonor herself died that same year, and so Francis (Francois from on, for me) inherited this extremely uneasy crown at either the age of 10 or the age of 13, depending on whether he was born in 1466 or 1469 (Wikipedia is being contradictory here): Taking a quick spin through Wikipedia, I find the following interesting detail: The mother of Francis was Magdalene of Valois. Her parents were Charles VII of France and Marie of Anjou. Magdalene was the youngest of Louis XI's sisters; she was Francois' regent and also the regent for daughter Catherine, who inherited the title after Francois' death in 1483. Magdalene died, a hostage of Fernando of Aragon, in 1494. Jean of Navarre, our wicked uncle, was Leonor's third son. He was born in 1450 and died in 1500. Eldest brother Gaston, Francois' father, was born in 1444 and died in 1470. In 1483, he based his claim to Navarre on the basis of being nearest male heir. Navarre didn't observe Salic Law and Catherine won the conflict in 1497. Wikipedia confirms Jean was on good terms with Louis XI and Louis XII. He married Marie of Orleans, sister to Louis XII (his daughter, Germaine, would be the second wife of Fernando of Aragon). Gaston, father of Francois, was born in 1444 and died as a result of a jousting accident in 1470. He was Prince of Navarre, but died before he succeeded to the throne. So the very violent and tangled line of succession in this short period of Navarre is this: Charles III of Navarre (1361-1425) His daughter, Blanca I was the wife of Juan II of Aragon (1398-1479) who fought for the crown of Navarre against Carlos IV Prince of Viana (1421-1461), and his son; and possibly got rid of Blanca II (1424-1464), and his daughter; and who was briefly succeeded by Leonor (1426-1479), his daughter. Who, after she died, was succeeded by Francois (1466/69?-1483), her grandson, because her son Gaston had died in 1470; and Francois was succeeded by his sister Catalina/Catherine (1468-1517); and who owed her succession to their regent mother Magdalene of Valois (1443-1495), who stood up against the claims of Jean de Foix (1450-1500), who apparently had the alliance of Louis XI despite the fact that Magdelene was Louis' sister. Definitely bears investigation, especially when you consider that Louis XI was dying in 1483 and would be dead in August. Much though it pains me, I have to try to see things from Louis' point of view, remembering that the Hundred Year War had ended only about 30 years previously; that much of his energy was directed against Burgundy and that he was undoubtedly trying make things as stable as possible for his own posterity- his own son would be a minor, so there was plenty for Louis to have to bulwark for him. Much rushed, Maria ejbronte@...

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:19 PM, pansydobersby <[email protected]> wrote:

I don't know if Maria has written about this at some point, but in the course of my own little investigations I looked into the affairs of the Foix family and came across a rather surprising story I'd never heard before.

King Francis of Navarre (known also as Francois Phébus), son of Gaston de Foix and Eleanor of Navarre, was a child king who died in January 1483 at the age of 16. It was widely believed he was poisoned. (The traditional story seems to be that the boy played a poisoned flute.)

Jean de Foix, Viscount Narbonne, was the young king's& wait for it& paternal uncle. After the boy's death, Jean usurped - or at least attempted to usurp - the throne of Navarre, though eventually he failed and the throne went to the boy's sister Catherine after all.

Jean was chummy with Louis XI, by the way, and with later kings of France too.

My first thoughts on reading this were:

(a) There seemed to be quite a few 'wicked uncles' about, didn't there?

(b) The time period right before and right after Louis XI's death was an especially risky time to be a young king or heir to the throne&

Also makes you wonder:

(a) Just how extensively planned were these French-sponsored coups d'état? The French obviously supported those candidates to neighbouring thrones who posed less of a risk to France in its transition period, but did their policy extend to actively eliminating riskier candidates?

(b) Just how much did the story of this other 'usurper uncle' of 1483 affect the legend of Richard?

Would be interesting to find out more about this story, though I've yet to find a book (in English or French) dealing with this subject in more detail. I'm guessing Maria has more information?

Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-16 23:15:33
pansydobersby

Thank you, Maria - I knew I could count on you! :)


Sorry, of course I meant that Gaston IV de Foix and Leonor of Navarre were Jean's parents, and therefore Francois' grandparents& but you made the whole thing so clear. What a fascinating, complicated and bloody line of succession, indeed.


I agree with you, by the way, that it's easy to see why Louis XI would have felt it necessary to& do whatever it is that he did. Thinking about this further, it does make one wonder if Edward IV's death was just a lucky coincidence, or&


Another thing that piqued my interest was that Jean 'Wicked Uncle' de Foix's sister Marguerite was the wife of Francis II of Brittany. Doesn't mean anything on its own, of course, but - still. Goes to show how very small that world was back then.


Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-16 23:18:39
pansydobersby

Thank you, Maria - I knew I could count on you! :)


Sorry, of course I meant that Gaston IV de Foix and Leonor of Navarre were Jean's parents, and therefore Francois' grandparents& but you made the whole thing so clear. What a fascinating, complicated and bloody line of succession, indeed.


I agree with you, by the way, that it's easy to see why Louis XI would have felt it necessary to& do whatever it is that he did. Thinking about this further, it does make one wonder if Edward IV's death was just a lucky coincidence, or&


Another thing that piqued my interest was that Jean 'Wicked Uncle' de Foix's sister Marguerite was the wife of Francis II of Brittany. Doesn't mean anything on its own, of course, but - still. Goes to show how very small that world was back then.


Pansy

Re : [Richard III Society Forum] A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-16 23:18:57
Durose David
The elimination of nephews was almost mandatory in the early Ottoman Empire - and more common than I ever imagined in Anglo Saxon royal families.

Regards
David
From: pansydobersby <[email protected]>;
To: <>;
Subject: A child king dead in 1483
Sent: Sun, Feb 16, 2014 6:19:22 PM

 

I don't know if Maria has written about this at some point, but in the course of my own little investigations I looked into the affairs of the Foix family and came across a rather surprising story I'd never heard before.


King Francis of Navarre (known also as Francois Phébus), son of Gaston de Foix and Eleanor of Navarre, was a child king who died in January 1483 at the age of 16. It was widely believed he was poisoned. (The traditional story seems to be that the boy played a poisoned flute.)


Jean de Foix, Viscount Narbonne, was the young king's& wait for it& paternal uncle. After the boy's death, Jean usurped - or at least attempted to usurp - the throne of Navarre, though eventually he failed and the throne went to the boy's sister Catherine after all.


Jean was chummy with Louis XI, by the way, and with later kings of France too.


My first thoughts on reading this were:

(a) There seemed to be quite a few 'wicked uncles' about, didn't there?

(b) The time period right before and right after Louis XI's death was an especially risky time to be a young king or heir to the throne&


Also makes you wonder:

(a) Just how extensively planned were these French-sponsored coups d'état? The French obviously supported those candidates to neighbouring thrones who posed less of a risk to France in its transition period, but did their policy extend to actively eliminating riskier candidates?

(b) Just how much did the story of this other 'usurper uncle' of 1483 affect the legend of Richard?


Would be interesting to find out more about this story, though I've yet to find a book (in English or French) dealing with this subject in more detail. I'm guessing Maria has more information?


Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-17 14:29:12
Hilary Jones
Your info is impressive as always Maria. If you look at the politics in the early reign of Henry VII it echoes this - and it's not at all surprising that Henry turned out to be a bit of an unnecessary pest to France. Perhaps they thought he'd never succeed; just cause enough disruption to divert Richard into English affairs, rather than avenging the 1475 pension? H

On Sunday, 16 February 2014, 20:13, Maria Torres <ejbronte@...> wrote:
How interesting! I don't know Francis, and it'll be fascinating to do some digging.
I can, however, fill in a couple of dots about his paternal ancestry:
His father was Gaston de Foix. Gaston's mother was Leonor of Navarre, whose father was Juan II of Aragon. This made Leonor the half-sister of Fernando of Aragon, husband of Isabel the Catholic.
Interestingly about Francis' grandmother Leonor is that she's suspected of poisoning her elder sister, Blanca: Blanca was married to Enrique IV of Castile for 13 years, but the marriage was never consummated. In 1453, the match was annulled, Enrique embarked on his disastrous marriage to Juana of Portugal (not "our" Joana) and Blanca returned to Navarre. She was incarcerated by her father Juan II and by Leonor.
The brother of Leonor and Blanca, Carlos Prince of Viana, was engaged in a war for Navarre against Papa Juan. Carlos was much more popular with the Navarrese than Papa Juan, and when Carlos died, possibly of TB, Blanca inherited his title and his popularity. She died of poison in 1464, and the title passed to Leonor who, wisely, didn't press her claim till Papa Juan died in 1479.
("Prince of Viana" is, for Navarre, the equivalent of "Prince of Wales" in England, and, incidentally, "Prince of Asturias" for Castile).
Leonor herself died that same year, and so Francis (Francois from on, for me) inherited this extremely uneasy crown at either the age of 10 or the age of 13, depending on whether he was born in 1466 or 1469 (Wikipedia is being contradictory here):
Taking a quick spin through Wikipedia, I find the following interesting detail:
The mother of Francis was Magdalene of Valois. Her parents were Charles VII of France and Marie of Anjou. Magdalene was the youngest of Louis XI's sisters; she was Francois' regent and also the regent for daughter Catherine, who inherited the title after Francois' death in 1483. Magdalene died, a hostage of Fernando of Aragon, in 1494.
Jean of Navarre, our wicked uncle, was Leonor's third son. He was born in 1450 and died in 1500. Eldest brother Gaston, Francois' father, was born in 1444 and died in 1470. In 1483, he based his claim to Navarre on the basis of being nearest male heir. Navarre didn't observe Salic Law and Catherine won the conflict in 1497. Wikipedia confirms Jean was on good terms with Louis XI and Louis XII. He married Marie of Orleans, sister to Louis XII (his daughter, Germaine, would be the second wife of Fernando of Aragon).
Gaston, father of Francois, was born in 1444 and died as a result of a jousting accident in 1470. He was Prince of Navarre, but died before he succeeded to the throne.
So the very violent and tangled line of succession in this short period of Navarre is this:
Charles III of Navarre (1361-1425) His daughter, Blanca I was the wife of
Juan II of Aragon (1398-1479) who fought for the crown of Navarre against
Carlos IV Prince of Viana (1421-1461), and his son; and possibly got rid of
Blanca II (1424-1464), and his daughter; and who was briefly succeeded by
Leonor (1426-1479), his daughter. Who, after she died, was succeeded by
Francois (1466/69?-1483), her grandson, because her son Gaston had died in 1470; and Francois was succeeded by his sister
Catalina/Catherine (1468-1517); and who owed her succession to their regent mother
Magdalene of Valois (1443-1495), who stood up against the claims of
Jean de Foix (1450-1500), who apparently had the alliance of Louis XI despite the fact that Magdelene was Louis' sister.
Definitely bears investigation, especially when you consider that Louis XI was dying in 1483 and would be dead in August. Much though it pains me, I have to try to see things from Louis' point of view, remembering that the Hundred Year War had ended only about 30 years previously; that much of his energy was directed against Burgundy and that he was undoubtedly trying make things as stable as possible for his own posterity- his own son would be a minor, so there was plenty for Louis to have to bulwark for him.
Much rushed,
Mariaejbronte@...





On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:19 PM, pansydobersby <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't know if Maria has written about this at some point, but in the course of my own little investigations I looked into the affairs of the Foix family and came across a rather surprising story I'd never heard before.
King Francis of Navarre (known also as Francois Phébus), son of Gaston de Foix and Eleanor of Navarre, was a child king who died in January 1483 at the age of 16. It was widely believed he was poisoned. (The traditional story seems to be that the boy played a poisoned flute.)
Jean de Foix, Viscount Narbonne, was the young king's& wait for it& paternal uncle. After the boy's death, Jean usurped - or at least attempted to usurp - the throne of Navarre, though eventually he failed and the throne went to the boy's sister Catherine after all.
Jean was chummy with Louis XI, by the way, and with later kings of France too.
My first thoughts on reading this were: (a) There seemed to be quite a few 'wicked uncles' about, didn't there? (b) The time period right before and right after Louis XI's death was an especially risky time to be a young king or heir to the throne&
Also makes you wonder: (a) Just how extensively planned were these French-sponsored coups d'état? The French obviously supported those candidates to neighbouring thrones who posed less of a risk to France in its transition period, but did their policy extend to actively eliminating riskier candidates? (b) Just how much did the story of this other 'usurper uncle' of 1483 affect the legend of Richard?
Would be interesting to find out more about this story, though I've yet to find a book (in English or French) dealing with this subject in more detail. I'm guessing Maria has more information?
Pansy


Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-17 15:00:52
pansydobersby
Hilary wrote:"If you look at the politics in the early reign of Henry VII it echoes this - and it's not at all surprising that Henry turned out to be a bit of an unnecessary pest to France. Perhaps they thought he'd never succeed; just cause enough disruption to divert Richard into English affairs, rather than avenging the 1475 pension? H "
I've got the gut feeling they *did* expect Henry to succeed (in their shoes, I'd probably have thought eliminating Richard to be a necessity, myself) but didn't expect his reign to be as (relatively) stable as it was. They must have realised how weak Henry's claim was... what they may have had in mind was keeping *Henry* busy with internal disruption for the unforeseeable future. Wars of the Roses ad infinitum, with nobody left who had a sufficiently strong claim to the throne to attain any real legitimacy...
Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-17 15:01:39
pansydobersby
Sorry, I just realised 'internal disruption' makes it sound like Henry had an upset stomach. That's not quite what I had in mind ;)
Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-17 15:18:18
SandraMachin
Maybe it wasn't what you had in mind, Pansy, but I for one am enjoying the thought of his discomfort. Sandra =^..^= From: pansydobersby Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 3:01 PM To: Subject: Re: A child king dead in 1483

Sorry, I just realised 'internal disruption' makes it sound like Henry had an upset stomach. That's not quite what I had in mind ;) Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-17 16:07:31
Hilary Jones
Yep I think you're probably right. They hoped he'd succeed but be diverted - just as you say. H

On Monday, 17 February 2014, 15:00, pansydobersby <[email protected]> wrote:
Hilary wrote:"If you look at the politics in the early reign of Henry VII it echoes this - and it's not at all surprising that Henry turned out to be a bit of an unnecessary pest to France. Perhaps they thought he'd never succeed; just cause enough disruption to divert Richard into English affairs, rather than avenging the 1475 pension? H "
I've got the gut feeling they *did* expect Henry to succeed (in their shoes, I'd probably have thought eliminating Richard to be a necessity, myself) but didn't expect his reign to be as (relatively) stable as it was. They must have realised how weak Henry's claim was... what they may have had in mind was keeping *Henry* busy with internal disruption for the unforeseeable future. Wars of the Roses ad infinitum, with nobody left who had a sufficiently strong claim to the throne to attain any real legitimacy...
Pansy

Re: A child king dead in 1483

2014-02-17 23:17:01
ricard1an
Also if you ignore Salic law wouldn't HT have some sort of a claim to the French throne through Catherine of Valois. In normal circumstances it might not have meant much but France had a boy King and the French might have thought if he can pursue such a flimsy claim to the English throne he could try to claim the French throne. They might have been glad to get rid of him. Either way he wouldn't be coming back to France.
Richard III
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.