Anne of Exeter's descendants

Marie, do you remember mentioning her in conjunction with the Five
Century Challenge? I have been at my favourite websites and traced
her senior male line to 1641 when it died out, the junior line to
1679 when they succeeded, and one female branch to 1649.

If you follow in my mouseclicks, be careful. First time around, I
used Tompsett and he has missed a generation in the second line, as I
found from Castelli (a knight born twenty years after his "mother"
died).

Well, back to Tompsett, who is at his best nearer to the present.
After all, we have pursued Richard's other siblings as far as we can
at present (until I can get my hands on Ruvigny).

I am not giving too much away just in case you decide to have a go!

Stephen

--- In , "stephenmlark"
<smlark@t...> wrote:
> Marie, do you remember mentioning her in conjunction with the Five
> Century Challenge? I have been at my favourite websites and traced
> her senior male line to 1641 when it died out, the junior line to
> 1679 when they succeeded, and one female branch to 1649.
>
> If you follow in my mouseclicks, be careful. First time around, I
> used Tompsett and he has missed a generation in the second line, as
I
> found from Castelli (a knight born twenty years after his "mother"
> died).
>
> Well, back to Tompsett, who is at his best nearer to the present.
> After all, we have pursued Richard's other siblings as far as we
can
> at present (until I can get my hands on Ruvigny).
>
> I am not giving too much away just in case you decide to have a go!
>
> Stephen

As I said, Stephen, I absolutely can't take this one on, but I'd be
very interested in your results.

Cecily's will is proving very interesting. As I've found, other
people have done work on it before, which has helped with identifying
a few of the individuals named, but I'm still going. Very interesting
connections. I'll say when I've finished, then if anyone wants a copy
of the file they can have it.
Marie