Harrington and Hornby

Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-23 15:36:42
Douglas Eugene Stamate
Hilary wrote: "I don't think David does. What we/you have to do is take ourselves into a different mindset where the great commodity was land, not stocks and shares. It was not about the fate of little boys and girls: since the Congquest it was about breeding to obtain wealth through land. I now have some 30,000 records of upper and middle classes in my database and there is not one ploughboy married to an heiress or lord married to a country wench. Richard was no different from the rest - he married an heiress to obtain her lands (even though her mother was not dead or attainted). So did George who had, incidentally, been refused a foreign marriage by Edward. That does not make them bad, they were of their time. And Richard would have to have been a saint indeed to have gone against all this. I find it hard to worship saints. I prefer a man whose flaws do not always sit easily with us." Doug here: If I understand the Harrington/Hornby brouhaha correctly it *originally* was about wardship/s and then, when one party was dissatisfied with the judicial decision degenerated into a squabble that included physical attacks and it was during the last that Richard didn't put himself in the best of lights -certainly by *our* standards and even possibly by *his.* What I don't understand is why a law, passed in the late 15th century and aimed at straightening out legal processes concerning land, wardships and inheritances for the "common weal", should be expected to *not* be of benefit to large landowners? References to the "common weal" can be made by Richard *without* any hypocrisy because then, as now (more's the pity), the first, over-riding care of those in power would be the interests of those who made up that very group; ie, the "common weal". What makes a difference with Richard is, I think, that he *also* cared about the "commons" but, while much of the legislation enacted *was* directed towards the problems of the group in power (that "common weal" again), he also supported legislation that helped extend the concept of the "common weal" to those who *weren't* that era's "movers and shakers." Doug who hopes this makes sense and doesn't come across as fence-sitting

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-24 17:05:58
maroonnavywhite
I believe it was Marie who pointed out hat whatever Richard did wrong or right in this case, he did it as a teenager whose voice likely hadn't even broke yet. I'd like to see how any of us would have done in his shoes. Furthermore, he did it on behalf of a family who were good friends of the Yorkist cause and who were being screwed into the ground by Edward, in a scenario that for me foreshadows what Edward would do to his own sister and her Burgundian subjects - and possibly what Edward would do to George, who like Richard would strongly object to Edward's acting as the Spider King's errand boy. Tamara

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-24 17:32:09
Hilary Jones
Trouble is things are never that easy. The Harrington girls' mother, Maud Clifford, married again to Sir Edmund Sutton and she married one of her daughters from that marriage to a Middleton. So perhaps the dispute was as much about rebuffed Middletons as it was about acquisitive Stanleys with the young Richard being drawn into what he thought was an honourable quarrel about Yorkist loyalties? As for being King Louis's puppets, I think they all unwittingly were. The book I'm currently reading states quite confidently that in 1485 France put Henry Tudor on the throne. And guess what, two years' later the French realised their mistake and conspired to get him off it again - all to do with Breton and Burgundian politics, a much neglected area as David has pointed out. H.

On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 17:06, "khafara@... []" <> wrote:


I believe it was Marie who pointed out hat whatever Richard did wrong or right in this case, he did it as a teenager whose voice likely hadn't even broke yet. I'd like to see how any of us would have done in his shoes. Furthermore, he did it on behalf of a family who were good friends of the Yorkist cause and who were being screwed into the ground by Edward, in a scenario that for me foreshadows what Edward would do to his own sister and her Burgundian subjects - and possibly what Edward would do to George, who like Richard would strongly object to Edward's acting as the Spider King's errand boy. Tamara

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-24 18:19:36
Pamela Bain
I agree.... I know more was expected in those days, as children were doing grown up jobs. And however well the boys were trained, they were still young. Given the decision making of both Edward and George, I think Richard was amazingly wise for his youthful age!

Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2014, at 11:06 AM, "khafara@... []" <> wrote:

I believe it was Marie who pointed out hat whatever Richard did wrong or right in this case, he did it as a teenager whose voice likely hadn't even broke yet. I'd like to see how any of us would have done in his shoes. Furthermore, he did it on behalf of a family who were good friends of the Yorkist cause and who were being screwed into the ground by Edward, in a scenario that for me foreshadows what Edward would do to his own sister and her Burgundian subjects - and possibly what Edward would do to George, who like Richard would strongly object to Edward's acting as the Spider King's errand boy. Tamara

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-24 18:20:36
Pamela Bain
Oh, how we wish the French had been successful!

Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2014, at 11:32 AM, "Hilary Jones hjnatdat@... []" <> wrote:

Trouble is things are never that easy. The Harrington girls' mother, Maud Clifford, married again to Sir Edmund Sutton and she married one of her daughters from that marriage to a Middleton. So perhaps the dispute was as much about rebuffed Middletons as it was about acquisitive Stanleys with the young Richard being drawn into what he thought was an honourable quarrel about Yorkist loyalties? As for being King Louis's puppets, I think they all unwittingly were. The book I'm currently reading states quite confidently that in 1485 France put Henry Tudor on the throne. And guess what, two years' later the French realised their mistake and conspired to get him off it again - all to do with Breton and Burgundian politics, a much neglected area as David has pointed out. H.

On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 17:06, "khafara@... []" <> wrote:


I believe it was Marie who pointed out hat whatever Richard did wrong or right in this case, he did it as a teenager whose voice likely hadn't even broke yet. I'd like to see how any of us would have done in his shoes. Furthermore, he did it on behalf of a family who were good friends of the Yorkist cause and who were being screwed into the ground by Edward, in a scenario that for me foreshadows what Edward would do to his own sister and her Burgundian subjects - and possibly what Edward would do to George, who like Richard would strongly object to Edward's acting as the Spider King's errand boy. Tamara

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-24 19:38:59
mariewalsh2003

Hi Hilary,

Do you know which Middleton family Maude Clifford married her child into?


The Westmorland Middletons were, of course, also close followers of Richard from the 1470s and joined the Yorkist rebellions after Bosworth.


But what you say even further suggests that Maude Clifford - the girls' mother - was not likely to have been in favour of breaking the arrangement for the elder girl to marry Geoffrey Middleton, i.e. not likely to have approved of Edward selling the marriages on to the Stanleys.

I was also very interested to learn from Whitaker that the Harrington brothers had a sister married to Thomas Broughton - perhaps the Sir Thomas Broughton of Broughton in Furness who rebelled with the Middletons and others after Bosworth, or a son of same?

Best,

Marie


Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-25 16:55:23
Hilary Jones
Hi Marie, really struggling to tie all this together. Maud Clifford's daughter Jane Sutton (or Dudley) married Sir William Middleton, High Sheriff of Yorks, who was born about 1475 and was the son of Sir Peter Middleton and Anne Vavasour. After Jane's death he married Isabel Dighton and Joan Robinson and didn't die till 1552. The Geoffrey Middleton mentioned in connection with Hornby is said to have been the son of Thomas Middleton and Margaret Lascelles of Kirkby Lonsdale and married Margaret Kirkham, dying in about 1524. There are two problems: Most visitations/databases I can find (and they are sparse) have this Geoffrey being born in 1484 which is far to late? There are few, if any Middleton families around at this point so they are more than likely to be linked, particularly as they both appear to have had strong Yorkist family links. Going back very far to tie them together is more than usually difficult. Haven't looked at the NA yet. Can I say at this point that the Hornby dispute is not my area of expertise (if any is). I've only read of it in Hipshon and was responding to David's point about legal issues. You are far more knowledgeable about it than me. H PS Whilst you were away I did manage to tie the early Stillingtons to the Inglebys though, and his relations the Newtons and Gorges to the Twynyhos in a legal land document.

On Saturday, 24 May 2014, 19:39, mariewalsh2003 <[email protected]> wrote:


Hi Hilary,Do you know which Middleton family Maude Clifford married her child into?
The Westmorland Middletons were, of course, also close followers of Richard from the 1470s and joined the Yorkist rebellions after Bosworth.
But what you say even further suggests that Maude Clifford - the girls' mother - was not likely to have been in favour of breaking the arrangement for the elder girl to marry Geoffrey Middleton, i.e. not likely to have approved of Edward selling the marriages on to the Stanleys.I was also very interested to learn from Whitaker that the Harrington brothers had a sister married to Thomas Broughton - perhaps the Sir Thomas Broughton of Broughton in Furness who rebelled with the Middletons and others after Bosworth, or a son of same?Best,Marie


Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-25 19:14:40
mariewalsh2003
Hilary wrote:Hi Marie, really struggling to tie all this together. Maud Clifford's daughter Jane Sutton (or Dudley) married Sir William Middleton, High Sheriff of Yorks, who was born about 1475 and was the son of Sir Peter Middleton and Anne Vavasour. After Jane's death he married Isabel Dighton and Joan Robinson and didn't die till 1552.

Marie replies:I have come across Sir Peter or Piers Middleton but haven't managed to tie him in to any particular family. All I can say is that he definitely belonged to Yorkshire, and was knighted by Northumberland on the Scottish campaign. Confusingly, there are writs of diem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not. There was a William Middleton in Yorks earlier on, associated with Stockeld by Northumberland's castle of Stockeld, and he was quite closely associated with the lawyer Thomas Middleton, who was on of the Westmorland Middletons by birth.

Hilary wrote: The Geoffrey Middleton mentioned in connection with Hornby is said to have been the son of Thomas Middleton and Margaret Lascelles of Kirkby Lonsdale and married Margaret Kirkham, dying in about 1524.There are two problems: Most visitations/databases I can find (and they are sparse) have this Geoffrey being born in 1484 which is far to late?
Marie replies:Far far too late. The reference to Geoffrey Middleton's payment for Anne Harrington's marriage comes from the Patent Rolls and is dated 24 November 1461. This is the problem with visitations - the information was collected far too late to be reliable for our period, and they frequently confused different individuals with the same name. Incidentally, I recently discovered that Richard organised the earliest known heraldic visitation (of the north of England, in the 1470s) and it is extant though it has never been published. Now, wouldn't that be an interesting project? Hilary wrote:There are few, if any Middleton families around at this point so they are more than likely to be linked, particularly as they both appear to have had strong Yorkist family links. Going back very far to tie them together is more than usually difficult. Haven't looked at the NA yet.
Marie replies:I carried out a trawl for Middletons once, and still have the 10,800-word file to prove it; I found there were oodles of them around, quite how many it was difficult to say as there were probably multiple Middletons bearing the same first name at certain periods and it's often hard to separate them out. A lot of them probably were related to each other but it's an assumption that can't be made without evidence particularly as Middleton is a fairly common place name. It's something I will need to get back to at some point. Can I say at this point that the Hornby dispute is not my area of expertise (if any is). I've only read of it in Hipshon and was responding to David's point about legal issues. You are far more knowledgeable about it than me. H
Marie replies:I still have a lot more questions than answers. One day perhaps I'll research the subject properly - it really interests me and I don't live a million miles from Hornby, but my guess is that the full unabridged story does not survive and that even when all the extant documents have been turned over and mined for details there will still be a lot of leeway for interpretation, particularly with regard to Richard's role in 1470. That's the way of it with most 15th-century history - we have bits of the jigsaw only, and so the temptation to try to ram the pieces we have into a picture even if they don't really fit together very well. Hilary wrote:PS Whilst you were away I did manage to tie the early Stillingtons to the Inglebys though, and his relations the Newtons and Gorges to the Twynyhos in a legal land document.
Marie:Ah, now I know there was a link with the Gorges because Ankarette's younger son William was granted the wardship and marriage of Marmaduke Gorges and it ended up in a Chancery case, but I haven't got any document linking the Twynyhos to any Newtons so would be very interested to see. Could you possibly email me a copy?

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-25 21:10:22
Stephen

Did a Cheddar ever marry a Gorge?

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mariewalsh2003
Sent: 25 May 2014 19:15
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Re: Harrington and Hornby

Hilary wrote:

Hi Marie, really struggling to tie all this together. Maud Clifford's daughter Jane Sutton (or Dudley) married Sir William Middleton, High Sheriff of Yorks, who was born about 1475 and was the son of Sir Peter Middleton and Anne Vavasour. After Jane's death he married Isabel Dighton and Joan Robinson and didn't die till 1552.

Marie replies:

I have come across Sir Peter or Piers Middleton but haven't managed to tie him in to any particular family. All I can say is that he definitely belonged to Yorkshire , and was knighted by Northumberland on the Scottish campaign. Confusingly, there are writs of diem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not. There was a William Middleton in Yorks earlier on, associated with Stockeld by Northumberland's castle of Stockeld , and he was quite closely associated with the lawyer Thomas Middleton, who was on of the Westmorland Middletons by birth.

Hilary wrote:

The Geoffrey Middleton mentioned in connection with Hornby is said to have been the son of Thomas Middleton and Margaret Lascelles of Kirkby Lonsdale and married Margaret Kirkham, dying in about 1524.

There are two problems:

Most visitations/databases I can find (and they are sparse) have this Geoffrey being born in 1484 which is far to late?

Marie replies:

Far far too late. The reference to Geoffrey Middleton's payment for Anne Harrington's marriage comes from the Patent Rolls and is dated 24 November 1461. This is the problem with visitations - the information was collected far too late to be reliable for our period, and they frequently confused different individuals with the same name. Incidentally, I recently discovered that Richard organised the earliest known heraldic visitation (of the north of England , in the 1470s) and it is extant though it has never been published. Now, wouldn't that be an interesting project?

Hilary wrote:

There are few, if any Middleton families around at this point so they are more than likely to be linked, particularly as they both appear to have had strong Yorkist family links. Going back very far to tie them together is more than usually difficult. Haven't looked at the NA yet.

Marie replies:

I carried out a trawl for Middletons once, and still have the 10,800-word file to prove it; I found there were oodles of them around, quite how many it was difficult to say as there were probably multiple Middletons bearing the same first name at certain periods and it's often hard to separate them out. A lot of them probably were related to each other but it's an assumption that can't be made without evidence particularly as Middleton is a fairly common place name. It's something I will need to get back to at some point.

Can I say at this point that the Hornby dispute is not my area of expertise (if any is). I've only read of it in Hipshon and was responding to David's point about legal issues. You are far more knowledgeable about it than me. H

Marie replies:

I still have a lot more questions than answers. One day perhaps I'll research the subject properly - it really interests me and I don't live a million miles from Hornby, but my guess is that the full unabridged story does not survive and that even when all the extant documents have been turned over and mined for details there will still be a lot of leeway for interpretation, particularly with regard to Richard's role in 1470. That's the way of it with most 15th-century history - we have bits of the jigsaw only, and so the temptation to try to ram the pieces we have into a picture even if they don't really fit together very well.

Hilary wrote:

PS Whilst you were away I did manage to tie the early Stillingtons to the Inglebys though, and his relations the Newtons and Gorges to the Twynyhos in a legal land document.

Marie:

Ah, now I know there was a link with the Gorges because Ankarette's younger son William was granted the wardship and marriage of Marmaduke Gorges and it ended up in a Chancery case, but I haven't got any document linking the Twynyhos to any Newtons so would be very interested to see. Could you possibly email me a copy?

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-25 21:14:00
SandraMachin
Nice one, Stephen! Sandra =^..^= From: mailto: Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 9:10 PM To: Subject: RE: Re: Harrington and Hornby

Did a Cheddar ever marry a Gorge?

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mariewalsh2003
Sent: 25 May 2014 19:15
To:
Subject: Re: Re: Harrington and Hornby

Hilary wrote:

Hi Marie, really struggling to tie all this together. Maud Clifford's daughter Jane Sutton (or Dudley) married Sir William Middleton, High Sheriff of Yorks, who was born about 1475 and was the son of Sir Peter Middleton and Anne Vavasour. After Jane's death he married Isabel Dighton and Joan Robinson and didn't die till 1552.

Marie replies:

I have come across Sir Peter or Piers Middleton but haven't managed to tie him in to any particular family. All I can say is that he definitely belonged to Yorkshire , and was knighted by Northumberland on the Scottish campaign. Confusingly, there are writs of diem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not. There was a William Middleton in Yorks earlier on, associated with Stockeld by Northumberland's castle of Stockeld , and he was quite closely associated with the lawyer Thomas Middleton, who was on of the Westmorland Middletons by birth.

Hilary wrote:

The Geoffrey Middleton mentioned in connection with Hornby is said to have been the son of Thomas Middleton and Margaret Lascelles of Kirkby Lonsdale and married Margaret Kirkham, dying in about 1524.

There are two problems:

Most visitations/databases I can find (and they are sparse) have this Geoffrey being born in 1484 which is far to late?

Marie replies:

Far far too late. The reference to Geoffrey Middleton's payment for Anne Harrington's marriage comes from the Patent Rolls and is dated 24 November 1461. This is the problem with visitations - the information was collected far too late to be reliable for our period, and they frequently confused different individuals with the same name. Incidentally, I recently discovered that Richard organised the earliest known heraldic visitation (of the north of England , in the 1470s) and it is extant though it has never been published. Now, wouldn't that be an interesting project?

Hilary wrote:

There are few, if any Middleton families around at this point so they are more than likely to be linked, particularly as they both appear to have had strong Yorkist family links. Going back very far to tie them together is more than usually difficult. Haven't looked at the NA yet.

Marie replies:

I carried out a trawl for Middletons once, and still have the 10,800-word file to prove it; I found there were oodles of them around, quite how many it was difficult to say as there were probably multiple Middletons bearing the same first name at certain periods and it's often hard to separate them out. A lot of them probably were related to each other but it's an assumption that can't be made without evidence particularly as Middleton is a fairly common place name. It's something I will need to get back to at some point.

Can I say at this point that the Hornby dispute is not my area of expertise (if any is). I've only read of it in Hipshon and was responding to David's point about legal issues. You are far more knowledgeable about it than me. H

Marie replies:

I still have a lot more questions than answers. One day perhaps I'll research the subject properly - it really interests me and I don't live a million miles from Hornby, but my guess is that the full unabridged story does not survive and that even when all the extant documents have been turned over and mined for details there will still be a lot of leeway for interpretation, particularly with regard to Richard's role in 1470. That's the way of it with most 15th-century history - we have bits of the jigsaw only, and so the temptation to try to ram the pieces we have into a picture even if they don't really fit together very well.

Hilary wrote:

PS Whilst you were away I did manage to tie the early Stillingtons to the Inglebys though, and his relations the Newtons and Gorges to the Twynyhos in a legal land document.

Marie:

Ah, now I know there was a link with the Gorges because Ankarette's younger son William was granted the wardship and marriage of Marmaduke Gorges and it ended up in a Chancery case, but I haven't got any document linking the Twynyhos to any Newtons so would be very interested to see. Could you possibly email me a copy?

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-26 10:23:29
Hilary Jones
Ah now that remains to be discovered :) :) H

On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 21:10, "'Stephen' stephenmlark@... []" <> wrote:


Did a Cheddar ever marry a Gorge? From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mariewalsh2003
Sent: 25 May 2014 19:15
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Re: Harrington and Hornby Hilary wrote: Hi Marie, really struggling to tie all this together. Maud Clifford's daughter Jane Sutton (or Dudley) married Sir William Middleton, High Sheriff of Yorks, who was born about 1475 and was the son of Sir Peter Middleton and Anne Vavasour. After Jane's death he married Isabel Dighton and Joan Robinson and didn't die till 1552. Marie replies: I have come across Sir Peter or Piers Middleton but haven't managed to tie him in to any particular family. All I can say is that he definitely belonged to Yorkshire , and was knighted by Northumberland on the Scottish campaign. Confusingly, there are writs of diem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not. There was a William Middleton in Yorks earlier on, associated with Stockeld by Northumberland's castle of Stockeld , and he was quite closely associated with the lawyer Thomas Middleton, who was on of the Westmorland Middletons by birth. Hilary wrote: The Geoffrey Middleton mentioned in connection with Hornby is said to have been the son of Thomas Middleton and Margaret Lascelles of Kirkby Lonsdale and married Margaret Kirkham, dying in about 1524. There are two problems: Most visitations/databases I can find (and they are sparse) have this Geoffrey being born in 1484 which is far to late? Marie replies: Far far too late. The reference to Geoffrey Middleton's payment for Anne Harrington's marriage comes from the Patent Rolls and is dated 24 November 1461. This is the problem with visitations - the information was collected far too late to be reliable for our period, and they frequently confused different individuals with the same name. Incidentally, I recently discovered that Richard organised the earliest known heraldic visitation (of the north of England , in the 1470s) and it is extant though it has never been published. Now, wouldn't that be an interesting project? Hilary wrote: There are few, if any Middleton families around at this point so they are more than likely to be linked, particularly as they both appear to have had strong Yorkist family links. Going back very far to tie them together is more than usually difficult. Haven't looked at the NA yet. Marie replies: I carried out a trawl for Middletons once, and still have the 10,800-word file to prove it; I found there were oodles of them around, quite how many it was difficult to say as there were probably multiple Middletons bearing the same first name at certain periods and it's often hard to separate them out. A lot of them probably were related to each other but it's an assumption that can't be made without evidence particularly as Middleton is a fairly common place name. It's something I will need to get back to at some point. Can I say at this point that the Hornby dispute is not my area of expertise (if any is). I've only read of it in Hipshon and was responding to David's point about legal issues. You are far more knowledgeable about it than me. H Marie replies: I still have a lot more questions than answers. One day perhaps I'll research the subject properly - it really interests me and I don't live a million miles from Hornby, but my guess is that the full unabridged story does not survive and that even when all the extant documents have been turned over and mined for details there will still be a lot of leeway for interpretation, particularly with regard to Richard's role in 1470. That's the way of it with most 15th-century history - we have bits of the jigsaw only, and so the temptation to try to ram the pieces we have into a picture even if they don't really fit together very well. Hilary wrote: PS Whilst you were away I did manage to tie the early Stillingtons to the Inglebys though, and his relations the Newtons and Gorges to the Twynyhos in a legal land document. Marie: Ah, now I know there was a link with the Gorges because Ankarette's younger son William was granted the wardship and marriage of Marmaduke Gorges and it ended up in a Chancery case, but I haven't got any document linking the Twynyhos to any Newtons so would be very interested to see. Could you possibly email me a copy?

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-26 10:57:05
Hilary Jones
Hi Marie, Sir Peter is indeed Sir Piers and I have his date of death as 21 Apr 1499 (aged 73). I think he was High Sheriff too. His father was Sir John (died 1478) who married a Thwaite. I think the Thwaites crop up with the other Middletons too, but know little about them. As you say, these Middletons came from Stockeld. The only other William is Sir John's father, who would almost certainly have been dead by then. But, William or Sir John must have had more children so perhaps the Thomas Middletons spring from there? There's a hotel in York called the Lady Anne Middleton hotel, which is 17th century - do you know whether it's the same family? I'll look back through my emails to send you the link on the Gorges from the NA. It was some time ago so bear with me. Regards H

On Monday, 26 May 2014, 10:23, "Hilary Jones hjnatdat@... []" <> wrote:


Ah now that remains to be discovered :) :) H

On Sunday, 25 May 2014, 21:10, "'Stephen' stephenmlark@... []" <> wrote:


Did a Cheddar ever marry a Gorge? From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mariewalsh2003
Sent: 25 May 2014 19:15
To:
Subject: Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Re: Harrington and Hornby Hilary wrote: Hi Marie, really struggling to tie all this together. Maud Clifford's daughter Jane Sutton (or Dudley) married Sir William Middleton, High Sheriff of Yorks, who was born about 1475 and was the son of Sir Peter Middleton and Anne Vavasour. After Jane's death he married Isabel Dighton and Joan Robinson and didn't die till 1552. Marie replies: I have come across Sir Peter or Piers Middleton but haven't managed to tie him in to any particular family. All I can say is that he definitely belonged to Yorkshire , and was knighted by Northumberland on the Scottish campaign. Confusingly, there are writs of diem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not. There was a William Middleton in Yorks earlier on, associated with Stockeld by Northumberland's castle of Stockeld , and he was quite closely associated with the lawyer Thomas Middleton, who was on of the Westmorland Middletons by birth. Hilary wrote: The Geoffrey Middleton mentioned in connection with Hornby is said to have been the son of Thomas Middleton and Margaret Lascelles of Kirkby Lonsdale and married Margaret Kirkham, dying in about 1524. There are two problems: Most visitations/databases I can find (and they are sparse) have this Geoffrey being born in 1484 which is far to late? Marie replies: Far far too late. The reference to Geoffrey Middleton's payment for Anne Harrington's marriage comes from the Patent Rolls and is dated 24 November 1461. This is the problem with visitations - the information was collected far too late to be reliable for our period, and they frequently confused different individuals with the same name. Incidentally, I recently discovered that Richard organised the earliest known heraldic visitation (of the north of England , in the 1470s) and it is extant though it has never been published. Now, wouldn't that be an interesting project? Hilary wrote: There are few, if any Middleton families around at this point so they are more than likely to be linked, particularly as they both appear to have had strong Yorkist family links. Going back very far to tie them together is more than usually difficult. Haven't looked at the NA yet. Marie replies: I carried out a trawl for Middletons once, and still have the 10,800-word file to prove it; I found there were oodles of them around, quite how many it was difficult to say as there were probably multiple Middletons bearing the same first name at certain periods and it's often hard to separate them out. A lot of them probably were related to each other but it's an assumption that can't be made without evidence particularly as Middleton is a fairly common place name. It's something I will need to get back to at some point. Can I say at this point that the Hornby dispute is not my area of expertise (if any is). I've only read of it in Hipshon and was responding to David's point about legal issues. You are far more knowledgeable about it than me. H Marie replies: I still have a lot more questions than answers. One day perhaps I'll research the subject properly - it really interests me and I don't live a million miles from Hornby, but my guess is that the full unabridged story does not survive and that even when all the extant documents have been turned over and mined for details there will still be a lot of leeway for interpretation, particularly with regard to Richard's role in 1470. That's the way of it with most 15th-century history - we have bits of the jigsaw only, and so the temptation to try to ram the pieces we have into a picture even if they don't really fit together very well. Hilary wrote: PS Whilst you were away I did manage to tie the early Stillingtons to the Inglebys though, and his relations the Newtons and Gorges to the Twynyhos in a legal land document. Marie: Ah, now I know there was a link with the Gorges because Ankarette's younger son William was granted the wardship and marriage of Marmaduke Gorges and it ended up in a Chancery case, but I haven't got any document linking the Twynyhos to any Newtons so would be very interested to see. Could you possibly email me a copy?



Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-26 16:55:11
Douglas Eugene Stamate
Marie wrote: //snip// "Confusingly, there are writs of iem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not." //snip// Doug here: I must confess I don't know what "diem clausit extremum" means, but if there were two filings, perhaps the second was because the first had something incorrect? Might a document be considered valueless if, say, the first name was incorrect - Piers for Peter or vice versa (about my limit of Latin)? Doug

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-26 17:40:11
Jan Mulrenan
Jan here.Doug, try Wikipedia with inquisition post mortem which will tell you everything! It gives information about publications of inq.p.ms.& I note with interest that the inq.p.ms for 1447-1461, 1461-1483 & 1483-1485 are as yet unpublished along with those of 1509-1660. Now, is this because scholars are working on them as I type? Or have they been published & Wikipedia does not yet know?
On 26 May 2014, at 17:55, "'Douglas Eugene Stamate' destama@... []" <> wrote:

Marie wrote: //snip// "Confusingly, there are writs of iem clausit extremum for a Sir Piers Middleton in both 1497 and 1500, so I don't know whether there were two Sir Peters or not." //snip// Doug here: I must confess I don't know what "diem clausit extremum" means, but if there were two filings, perhaps the second was because the first had something incorrect? Might a document be considered valueless if, say, the first name was incorrect - Piers for Peter or vice versa (about my limit of Latin)? Doug

Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-27 14:28:19
Douglas Eugene Stamate
Jan wrote: "Doug, try Wikipedia with inquisition post mortem which will tell you everything!" //snip// Doug here: Thank you for the suggestion!. I "wiki-ed" "inquisition post mortem" and, as you say, found everything needed. In the section titled "Avoidance Measures", I found the last line very interesting: "Such avoidance devices (transferring legal title while retaining the use and revenue of property) were apparently tolerated by the crown for a considerable time, yet on the accession of King Henry VII (1485-1509) the king's ancient right to his feudal incidents was enforced *with determination and ruthlessness.*" (my emphasis) Perhaps the heirs omitted some property/properties that had been "enfeoffed to uses" (placed in a trust) and were forced to re-file to include those properties? Which would increase the king's take... Doug

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-28 10:58:49
Hilary Jones
Marie - sorry this is in the wrong place Short title: Gorges v Chokke. Plaintiffs: Edmond Gorges, heir of Sir Theabold Gorges. Defendants: Richard Chokke, knight, John Cheney, Maude Gorges, and William Twynyho. Subject: Manor of Wroxhale; also manor of Horsington. Somerset. 4 documents Date: 1465-1471, or perhaps 1480-1483 Held by: The National Archives, Kew Chokke was of course guardian of Stillington's grandchildren and they married into the Gorges family. Pansy had also managed to link John Stacy with all this. H

On Tuesday, 27 May 2014, 14:28, "'Douglas Eugene Stamate' destama@... []" <> wrote:


Jan wrote: "Doug, try Wikipedia with inquisition post mortem which will tell you everything!" //snip// Doug here: Thank you for the suggestion!. I "wiki-ed" "inquisition post mortem" and, as you say, found everything needed. In the section titled "Avoidance Measures", I found the last line very interesting: "Such avoidance devices (transferring legal title while retaining the use and revenue of property) were apparently tolerated by the crown for a considerable time, yet on the accession of King Henry VII (1485-1509) the king's ancient right to his feudal incidents was enforced *with determination and ruthlessness.*" (my emphasis) Perhaps the heirs omitted some property/properties that had been "enfeoffed to uses" (placed in a trust) and were forced to re-file to include those properties? Which would increase the king's take... Doug

Re: Harrington and Hornby

2014-05-28 15:22:28
mariewalsh2003
Hilary wrote:
Marie - sorry this is in the wrong place Short title: Gorges v Chokke.Plaintiffs: Edmond Gorges, heir of Sir Theabold Gorges.Defendants: Richard Chokke, knight, John Cheney, Maude Gorges, and William Twynyho.Subject: Manor of Wroxhale; also manor of Horsington.Somerset. 4 documents Date: 1465-1471, or perhaps 1480-1483 Held by: The National Archives, Kew Chokke was of course guardian of Stillington's grandchildren and they married into the Gorges family. Pansy had also managed to link John Stacy with all this. H
Marie replies:The above docs are the Chancery case I referred to in my previous post. I downloaded and transcribed them a few years back. They definitely belong to 1480-83 - in fact, to 1481-83. In April 1481 Edward IV sold William Twynyho the wardship and marriage of Marmaduke Gorges, son of the late Richard Gorges, a son of Sir Theobald Gorges of Wraxall and Horsington (d.1468) by his second marriage - you can find this in the Patent Rolls. Sir Theobald's natural heir was the son of his first marriage, Walter, but he had enfeoffed Horsington to be held after his death to the use of his younger son, Richard. On the strength of the royal grant WT seized wee Marmaduke and got Sir Theobald's surviving feoffees to hand over to him the deeds not only to Horsington but also to Wraxall, which should have gone to Walter's son Edmund Gorges. Hence Edmund Gorges' Chancery case against William Twynyho and the feoffees.I don't know who Marmaduke Gorges went on to marry, I'm afraid.

Richard III
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.