A mysterious infant

A mysterious infant

2004-08-28 16:54:09
stephenmlark
There is a lovely portrait of Winifred Pole in Ruvigny. In his
introduction, however, he mentions a later (Exeter) volume
incorporating the Suffolk line. Perhaps he can solve this mystery:
Edward de la Pole, son of the Earl of Lincoln, died young but what
are the years of his birth and death?
i) Born by 1487/8 (his father died on 16 June).
ii) Died by 1491 (otherwise he would have been the 3rd Duke of
Suffolk).
iii) Not born until: (whatever year Lincoln married Margaret
Fitzalan).
Are there any reliable clues elsewhere? It would certainly "colour"
our perception of Richard's reign.

Stephen

Re: A mysterious infant

2004-08-28 21:50:57
marie
--- In , "stephenmlark"
<smlark@t...> wrote:
> There is a lovely portrait of Winifred Pole in Ruvigny. In his
> introduction, however, he mentions a later (Exeter) volume
> incorporating the Suffolk line. Perhaps he can solve this mystery:
> Edward de la Pole, son of the Earl of Lincoln, died young but what
> are the years of his birth and death?
> i) Born by 1487/8 (his father died on 16 June).
> ii) Died by 1491 (otherwise he would have been the 3rd Duke of
> Suffolk).
> iii) Not born until: (whatever year Lincoln married Margaret
> Fitzalan).
> Are there any reliable clues elsewhere? It would certainly "colour"
> our perception of Richard's reign.
>
> Stephen

He's not difficult to trace. Offhand all I can tell you off my tree
is that he was Archdeacon of Richmond and died before 8 October 1485.
So he was another clerical Pole. I think he was the one who was
regarded as something of a prodigy at Oxford. Since he was the second
of many sons I assume he would have been born by 1465. I'm sure you
won't find it hard to get info on him.

Marie

PS. What did you mean by point iii?
Richard III
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.