One year ago
One year ago
2004-12-03 09:31:30
We were all talking about Jones' article in the Daily Mail, his
thoughts on Edward IV, the alternative Royal line and the interview
with an Earl in Australia.
How has this changed your thinking over a year?
thoughts on Edward IV, the alternative Royal line and the interview
with an Earl in Australia.
How has this changed your thinking over a year?
Re: One year ago
2004-12-03 09:49:26
Would it really make a difference if Jones' hypothesis was true as
the current Royal Family base their claim to the throne on their
descent from Henry VII don't they? I know it helped that he married
Elizabeth of York but if you keep going back further into history
surely there must be myriads of "real" monarchs.
Tracy-Anne
--- In , "stephenmlark"
<smlark@t...> wrote:
>
> We were all talking about Jones' article in the Daily Mail, his
> thoughts on Edward IV, the alternative Royal line and the interview
> with an Earl in Australia.
> How has this changed your thinking over a year?
the current Royal Family base their claim to the throne on their
descent from Henry VII don't they? I know it helped that he married
Elizabeth of York but if you keep going back further into history
surely there must be myriads of "real" monarchs.
Tracy-Anne
--- In , "stephenmlark"
<smlark@t...> wrote:
>
> We were all talking about Jones' article in the Daily Mail, his
> thoughts on Edward IV, the alternative Royal line and the interview
> with an Earl in Australia.
> How has this changed your thinking over a year?