Possible buriel site of Edward, Prince of Wales
Possible buriel site of Edward, Prince of Wales
2005-07-18 19:32:31
May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an established
favorite for the York family.
favorite for the York family.
Re: Possible buriel site of Edward, Prince of Wales
2005-07-19 01:25:42
--- In , "Rhonda" <metrlt@s...>
wrote:
> May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an
established
> favorite for the York family.
If the castle itself, there won't be much to see. It fell into ruin
and was finally razed in 1627. According to online sources, nothing
remains but the motte on which it stood.
However the same sources say Richard Duke of York was buried "in a
nearby church." I presume that that church holds no evidence of young
Edward.
Katy
wrote:
> May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an
established
> favorite for the York family.
If the castle itself, there won't be much to see. It fell into ruin
and was finally razed in 1627. According to online sources, nothing
remains but the motte on which it stood.
However the same sources say Richard Duke of York was buried "in a
nearby church." I presume that that church holds no evidence of young
Edward.
Katy
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Possible buriel site of Edward, Pri
2005-07-19 08:51:49
On Jul 18, 2005, at 19:17, Rhonda wrote:
> May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an established
> favorite for the York family.
>
Yet King Edward was buried at Windsor, and Queen Anne in the Abbey. I
would imagine Anne would have wanted to be buried with her son. No?
Mystery upon mystery.....
Paul
you're never too old to launch your dreams
> May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an established
> favorite for the York family.
>
Yet King Edward was buried at Windsor, and Queen Anne in the Abbey. I
would imagine Anne would have wanted to be buried with her son. No?
Mystery upon mystery.....
Paul
you're never too old to launch your dreams
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Re: Possible buriel site of Edward,
2005-07-19 12:16:46
The church at Fotheringhay contains huge tombs for Richard, Duke of
York, his wife Cecily, and their son Edmund, killed with his father
at Wakefield. There is no evidence of anybody else, unless Phil Stone
wants to correct me, as he is the expert on that particular church.
Paul
On Jul 19, 2005, at 01:25, oregonkaty wrote:
> --- In , "Rhonda" <metrlt@s...>
> wrote:
>
>> May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an
>>
> established
>
>> favorite for the York family.
>>
>
> If the castle itself, there won't be much to see. It fell into ruin
> and was finally razed in 1627. According to online sources, nothing
> remains but the motte on which it stood.
>
> However the same sources say Richard Duke of York was buried "in a
> nearby church." I presume that that church holds no evidence of
> young
> Edward.
>
> Katy
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
you're never too old to launch your dreams
York, his wife Cecily, and their son Edmund, killed with his father
at Wakefield. There is no evidence of anybody else, unless Phil Stone
wants to correct me, as he is the expert on that particular church.
Paul
On Jul 19, 2005, at 01:25, oregonkaty wrote:
> --- In , "Rhonda" <metrlt@s...>
> wrote:
>
>> May as well put forward the possibility of Fotheringay, an
>>
> established
>
>> favorite for the York family.
>>
>
> If the castle itself, there won't be much to see. It fell into ruin
> and was finally razed in 1627. According to online sources, nothing
> remains but the motte on which it stood.
>
> However the same sources say Richard Duke of York was buried "in a
> nearby church." I presume that that church holds no evidence of
> young
> Edward.
>
> Katy
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
you're never too old to launch your dreams