Richard Duke of York
Richard Duke of York
Carol
Loyaulte' me lie
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Richard Duke of York
Clarence is not known to have had any mistresses or bastards - again, the information isn't there.
Ann
Carol Rondou <lilith@...> wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew if Richard had any affairs? Also I've never read anything about Clarence having a mistress.
Carol
Loyaulte' me lie
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Richard Duke of York
Ann
A LYON <A.Lyon1@...> wrote:
Richard acknowledged two bastards, though no information about their mothers has survived, and it is also unclear whether they were born/conceived before or after his marriage. The information just isn't there.
Clarence is not known to have had any mistresses or bastards - again, the information isn't there.
Ann
Carol Rondou <lilith@...> wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew if Richard had any affairs? Also I've never read anything about Clarence having a mistress.
Carol
Loyaulte' me lie
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
SPONSORED LINKS
Call united kingdom United kingdom vacation United kingdom travel
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Richard Duke of York
wrote:
>
> Apologies, in my previous message I assumed Caro was asking about
Richard IIl, not his father, Richard, Duke of York, who is not known
to have had either mistresses or bastards.
>
> Ann
>
Thank you for the information. Does anyone know if there are any
biographies of Richard's parents? I am waiting on aninterlibrary loan
to get Hick's bio of Clarence.
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Richard Duke of York
Abit of a tedious read I thought but the only one I know of.
Helen
lilith82200 <lilith@...> wrote:
Does anyone know if there are any
biographies of Richard's parents? I am waiting on aninterlibrary loan
to get Hick's bio of Clarence.
SPONSORED LINKS
Call united kingdom United kingdom vacation United kingdom travel
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Movies: Check out the Latest Trailers, Premiere Photos and full Actor Database.
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] Richard Duke of York
flesh on the bones for the rainbow Duke. He seems to have been so
immersed in politics that the personal view has been lost. Yet he
fathered a large brood of children so he can't have been all work and
no play!
--- In , Helen Rowe
<sweethelly2003@y...> wrote:
>
> There is a biography of Richard, Duke of York by P. A. Johnson (or
Johnston).
> Abit of a tedious read I thought but the only one I know of.
>
> Helen
>
> lilith82200 <lilith@e...> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there are any
> biographies of Richard's parents? I am waiting on aninterlibrary
loan
> to get Hick's bio of Clarence.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS
> Call united kingdom United kingdom vacation United kingdom travel
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Movies: Check out the Latest Trailers, Premiere
Photos and full Actor Database.
>
>
>
Richard Duke of York
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-stained-glass-windows-depicting-richard-duke-of-york-and-king-edward-55636681.html.
I found this likeness of Richard Duke of York. The jaw is a dead ringer for King Richards on his facial reconstruction. Chip off the old block as we say. He was not illegitimate.
Re: Richard Duke of York
like a typical 19.century glass window. The pity is that portraits of historical persons were created through
the many years since these people were long dead and often the result was mostly in the phantasy of the respectiva artist.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
Nico
Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York - Wikipedia
Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York - Wikipedia
On Thursday, 2 February 2017, 22:42, "eva.pitter@... []" <> wrote:
I would not rely on this stained glass image of the Duke of York as a true likeness of him. To me it looks
like a typical 19.century glass window. The pity is that portraits of historical persons were created through
the many years since these people were long dead and often the result was mostly in the phantasy of the respectiva artist.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
Becky
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <> wrote:
http://www.alamy.com/stock- photo-stained-glass-windows- depicting-richard-duke-of- york-and-king-edward-55636681. html.
I found this likeness of Richard Duke of York. The jaw is a dead ringer for King Richards on his facial reconstruction. Chip off the old block as we say. He was not illegitimate.
Re: Richard Duke of York
I just thought the similarity was uncanny. Richards portraits do not show it so how could later artists have bit knit so well unless they had a pretty accurate image?
On Feb 3, 2017 9:47 AM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <> wrote:
Karen, I thought the same thing about the jaw, but then I realized the age of the stained glass. However, do we know what research the artist did, or what resources were used in forming the image? There is a 15th century illumination or illustration in a book somewhere, members of the forum may know what I'm talking about, that is alleged to be Richard III. I'll try to dig it up.
Becky
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <@ yahoogroups.com> wrote:
http://www.alamy.com/stock-pho to-stained-glass-windows-depic ting-richard-duke-of-york-and- king-edward-55636681.html.
I found this likeness of Richard Duke of York. The jaw is a dead ringer for King Richards on his facial reconstruction. Chip off the old block as we say. He was not illegitimate.
Re: Richard Duke of York
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <> wrote:
I just thought the similarity was uncanny. Richards portraits do not show it so how could later artists have bit knit so well unless they had a pretty accurate image?
On Feb 3, 2017 9:47 AM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <@ yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Karen, I thought the same thing about the jaw, but then I realized the age of the stained glass. However, do we know what research the artist did, or what resources were used in forming the image? There is a 15th century illumination or illustration in a book somewhere, members of the forum may know what I'm talking about, that is alleged to be Richard III. I'll try to dig it up.
Becky
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <@yahoog roups.com> wrote:
http://www.alamy.com/stock-pho to-stained-glass-windows-depic ting-richard-duke-of-york-and- king-edward-55636681.html.
I found this likeness of Richard Duke of York. The jaw is a dead ringer for King Richards on his facial reconstruction. Chip off the old block as we say. He was not illegitimate.
Re: Richard Duke of York
I don't think it like one like Richards portraits at all. It looked like like his reconstructed face.
On Feb 3, 2017 10:45 AM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <> wrote:
I'm thinking the same. There might have been some image floating around we are not aware of. And I am guessing the Duke of York portrait might have been designed to look like the image of his son. But that is just a wild guess.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <@ yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I just thought the similarity was uncanny. Richards portraits do not show it so how could later artists have bit knit so well unless they had a pretty accurate image?
On Feb 3, 2017 9:47 AM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <@yahoog roups.com> wrote:
Karen, I thought the same thing about the jaw, but then I realized the age of the stained glass. However, do we know what research the artist did, or what resources were used in forming the image? There is a 15th century illumination or illustration in a book somewhere, members of the forum may know what I'm talking about, that is alleged to be Richard III. I'll try to dig it up.
Becky
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <@yahoog roups.com> wrote:
http://www.alamy.com/stock-pho to-stained-glass-windows-depic ting-richard-duke-of-york-and- king-edward-55636681.html.
I found this likeness of Richard Duke of York. The jaw is a dead ringer for King Richards on his facial reconstruction. Chip off the old block as we say. He was not illegitimate.
Re: Richard Duke of York
"I'm thinking the same. There might have been some image floating around we are not aware of. And I am guessing the Duke of York portrait might have been designed to look like the image of his son. But that is just a wild guess."
Carol responds:
There's an image of him from the 1445 Talbot Shrewsbury Book at Wikipedia--not very well drawn, but it shows him as blond and the clothes are probably authentic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_of_York,_3rd_Duke_of_York#/media/File:Richard_of_York_Talbot_Shrewsbury_Book.jpeg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_of_York,_3rd_Duke_of_York#/media/File:Richard_of_York_Talbot_Shrewsbury_Book.jpeg
The only other "portrait" I know of is the ghastly black-and-white drawing depicting him with an anachronistic two-pronged beard. I think it's eighteenth century though I can't seem to find a date for it--certainly not contemporary. ttp://www.luminarium.org/encyclopedia/richardyork.htm
You'll need to cut and paste the URLs as I didn't want the entire articles to show up.
Carol
Re: Richard Duke of York
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <> wrote:
I don't think it like one like Richards portraits at all. It looked like like his reconstructed face.
On Feb 3, 2017 10:45 AM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <@ yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I'm thinking the same. There might have been some image floating around we are not aware of. And I am guessing the Duke of York portrait might have been designed to look like the image of his son. But that is just a wild guess.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <@yahoog roups.com> wrote:
I just thought the similarity was uncanny. Richards portraits do not show it so how could later artists have bit knit so well unless they had a pretty accurate image?
On Feb 3, 2017 9:47 AM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <@yahoog roups.com> wrote:
Karen, I thought the same thing about the jaw, but then I realized the age of the stained glass. However, do we know what research the artist did, or what resources were used in forming the image? There is a 15th century illumination or illustration in a book somewhere, members of the forum may know what I'm talking about, that is alleged to be Richard III. I'll try to dig it up.
Becky
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Karen O karenoder4@... [] <@yahoog roups.com> wrote:
http://www.alamy.com/stock-pho to-stained-glass-windows-depic ting-richard-duke-of-york-and- king-edward-55636681.html.
I found this likeness of Richard Duke of York. The jaw is a dead ringer for King Richards on his facial reconstruction. Chip off the old block as we say. He was not illegitimate.
Re: Richard Duke of York
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:02 AM, justcarol67@... [] <> wrote:
<[email protected] :
"I'm thinking the same. There might have been some image floating around we are not aware of. And I am guessing the Duke of York portrait might have been designed to look like the image of his son. But that is just a wild guess."
Carol responds:
There's an image of him from the 1445 Talbot Shrewsbury Book at Wikipedia--not very well drawn, but it shows him as blond and the clothes are probably authentic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Richard_of_York,_3rd_Duke_of_ York#/media/File:Richard_of_ York_Talbot_Shrewsbury_Book. jpeg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Richard_of_York,_3rd_Duke_of_ York#/media/File:Richard_of_ York_Talbot_Shrewsbury_Book. jpeg
The only other "portrait" I know of is the ghastly black-and-white drawing depicting him with an anachronistic two-pronged beard. I think it's eighteenth century though I can't seem to find a date for it--certainly not contemporary. ttp://www.luminarium.org/ encyclopedia/richardyork.htm
You'll need to cut and paste the URLs as I didn't want the entire articles to show up.
Carol
Re: Richard Duke of York
"Yes Carol, I hate that fork-beard portrait! What I'm talking about and I can't find it was an illumination that pictured a man dressed in blue(I think blue), seated in profile, listening to some type of wise person, hermit, clergyman, I'm not sure who the speaker is. There has been speculation that it might be Richard III as Duke of Gloucester. The man has a fairly strong chin (to put it mildly). The illustration/illumination is from the 15th century, I think. It may be in the forum documents. I will try to locate it and post. Someone might remember it? I think it was several years ago when I saw it."
Carol responds:
I'm confused. I thought we were talking about a portrait of Richard Duke of York. You might mean this one of Ricard Duke of Gloucester (almost certainly the man in royal robes standing beside Anthony Woodville: http://c8.alamy.com/comp/G1DB5A/anthony-woodville-and-william-caxton-presenting-the-first-printed-G1DB5A.jpg http://c8.alamy.com/comp/G1DB5A/anthony-w... View on c8.alamy.com Preview by Yahoo
There's another one where the man sometimes identified as Richard (mistakenly, I'm sure, since he was in is teens at the time and the man looks about thirty) wearing a garter (Knights of the Garter) on his leg, but that man (Hastings?) isn't wearing blue and isn't sitting. Notice also that there are two men in green hats and identical doublets, another reason I think they're stock figures. http://famwiechers.nl/onewebstatic/4aba9e5032-Royal%2015%20E%20IV%20%20f.%2014r%20Edward%20IV%20%28detail%29%20door%20Meester%20van%20de%20Londense%20Wavrin.jpg
http://famwiechers.nl/onewebstatic/4aba9e503... View on famwiechers.nl Preview by Yahoo
I think the one you're referring to (I vaguely recall the picture you're describing) is by the same artist and the man is a kind of stock figure of a noble who doesn't really resemble the person he's supposed to represent, but I can't find a Google image of it at the moment.
But none of this brings us any closer to Richard duke of York. I think the blond man in blue robes I linked to in my previous message is as close as we're going to get. Too bad the artist wasn't more skilled at painting faces.
Carol
Re: Richard Duke of York
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:12 PM, justcarol67@... [] <> wrote:
"Yes Carol, I hate that fork-beard portrait! What I'm talking about and I can't find it was an illumination that pictured a man dressed in blue(I think blue), seated in profile, listening to some type of wise person, hermit, clergyman, I'm not sure who the speaker is. There has been speculation that it might be Richard III as Duke of Gloucester. The man has a fairly strong chin (to put it mildly). The illustration/illumination is from the 15th century, I think. It may be in the forum documents. I will try to locate it and post. Someone might remember it? I think it was several years ago when I saw it."
Carol responds:
I'm confused. I thought we were talking about a portrait of Richard Duke of York. You might mean this one of Ricard Duke of Gloucester (almost certainly the man in royal robes standing beside Anthony Woodville: http://c8.alamy.com/comp/ G1DB5A/anthony-woodville-and- william-caxton-presenting-the- first-printed-G1DB5A.jpg http://c8.alamy.com/comp/ G1DB5A/anthony-w... View on c8.alamy.com Preview by Yahoo
There's another one where the man sometimes identified as Richard (mistakenly, I'm sure, since he was in is teens at the time and the man looks about thirty) wearing a garter (Knights of the Garter) on his leg, but that man (Hastings?) isn't wearing blue and isn't sitting. Notice also that there are two men in green hats and identical doublets, another reason I think they're stock figures. http://famwiechers.nl/ onewebstatic/4aba9e5032-Royal% 2015%20E%20IV%20%20f.%2014r% 20Edward%20IV%20%28detail%29% 20door%20Meester%20van%20de% 20Londense%20Wavrin.jpg
http://famwiechers.nl/ onewebstatic/4aba9e503... View on famwiechers.nl Preview by Yahoo
I think the one you're referring to (I vaguely recall the picture you're describing) is by the same artist and the man is a kind of stock figure of a noble who doesn't really resemble the person he's supposed to represent, but I can't find a Google image of it at the moment.
But none of this brings us any closer to Richard duke of York. I think the blond man in blue robes I linked to in my previous message is as close as we're going to get. Too bad the artist wasn't more skilled at painting faces.
Carol
Re: Richard Duke of York
hermit knight instructing a squire in the duties of Knighthood? It is printed in Anne Sutton's and Livia Visser-
Fuchs' "Richard III's Books", page 82. I personally do'nt think that it depicts Richard, but the hair and the chin
makes one think of him.
I think that we should be rather cautious in seeing portraits in illuminations in books as close to life ,even if they are contemporary. I doubt, that the artists ever saw the depicted personally.
I remember, unfortunately only vagely, that I read an article once, that stated, that the "Richard" in the illumination from the deWavrin chronicle was a standard figure of a Joker in cardgames. And I wonder, why the auhors of various books where so sure, that the ugliest figure in this scene had to be identified as Richard?
There seems to be no other reason for this, than the prejudice deriving from the writings of More and the like.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
Sent from my iPad
Re: Richard Duke of York
By the way I found out about the article I mentioned yesterday. It was in fact a short summery of an article advertised in The Ricardian Volume XXVI, page 173. I quote:"When Strutt and his imitators searched for a figure that answered their imaginary idea of what a villainous Richard looked like they chose, by chance, the knave of cards! They did not find a portrait of the historical Richard."
And ever since,for over 200 hundred years, nobody took the trouble to question this. I have a couple of books
that say like."the figure on the left with the Garter on his leg has been identified(sic) as Richard of Gloucester".
The article is written by Sutton and Visser-Fuchs, two historians I highly apreciate for their meticulous research and their sensible conclusions.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
There's also this contemporary representation of York from Cirencester parish church:
http://www.freerangephotography.co.uk/p306234865/h1EE6DFA1#h1ee6dfa1
Re: Richard Duke of York
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 4, 2017, at 3:28 AM, eva.pitter@... [] <> wrote:
Rebecca,you are welcome!
By the way I found out about the article I mentioned yesterday. It was in fact a short summery of an article advertised in The Ricardian Volume XXVI, page 173. I quote:"When Strutt and his imitators searched for a figure that answered their imaginary idea of what a villainous Richard looked like they chose, by chance, the knave of cards! They did not find a portrait of the historical Richard."
And ever since,for over 200 hundred years, nobody took the trouble to question this. I have a couple of books
that say like."the figure on the left with the Garter on his leg has been identified(sic) as Richard of Gloucester".
The article is written by Sutton and Visser-Fuchs, two historians I highly apreciate for their meticulous research and their sensible conclusions.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
In several sketches of Richard I have seen he had sorta puffy curly hair. I presume he curled it. This is the "do" we see in The White Queen. It's odd thinking of him with curl rags but maybe it was natural. Anne's hair looks brown or Auburn..
On Feb 4, 2017 11:05 PM, "Rebecca Jacks missijacks@... []" <> wrote:
Well thank you again for that extra information!
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 4, 2017, at 3:28 AM, eva.pitter@... [] <@ yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Rebecca,you are welcome!
By the way I found out about the article I mentioned yesterday. It was in fact a short summery of an article advertised in The Ricardian Volume XXVI, page 173. I quote:"When Strutt and his imitators searched for a figure that answered their imaginary idea of what a villainous Richard looked like they chose, by chance, the knave of cards! They did not find a portrait of the historical Richard."
And ever since,for over 200 hundred years, nobody took the trouble to question this. I have a couple of books
that say like."the figure on the left with the Garter on his leg has been identified(sic) as Richard of Gloucester".
The article is written by Sutton and Visser-Fuchs, two historians I highly apreciate for their meticulous research and their sensible conclusions.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
Ive visited Circencester church several times..they have made such a mess of the floor. Looks like modern tiles..Eileen
Re: Richard Duke of York
In the best near contemporary potrait, the Round Top Society of Antiquary portrait, Richard is shown with curly hair, that falls quite naturally. No need for curlers there. The problem is only that the highlights, that presumably had been there (as was the practice of painters then), vanished with the cleaning of the picture in 2007. Before the cleaning the hair was more accentuated. In the other near contemporary portraits the hair was painted in
a more stylised manner, but also curled. So, IMO, Richard had naturall curly hair.
Certainly he had not the hairstyle of the facial recreation, on which the hair looks thin and uncombed.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/44/59/1d/44591d7d0705f4e6c832bdeb5abb41b8.jpg
He does look young in this particular image, but there is a similarity to the Talbot picture, especially the nose. Are there any reliable pictures of Cecily other than this one?
http://www.richardiii.net/2_2_0_riii_family.php
I'm not sure which one the children look most like, but probably Richard seems most like RofY, with Margaret and Edward being more like Cecily. I'm not sure about Clarence and the others. I was surprised at RofY's blonde hair, which is a similar shade to his grandchildren in the Royal Window. Cecily must have been a brunette though.
Nico
On Sunday, 5 February 2017, 19:06, "eva.pitter@... []" <> wrote:
Hi karen O,
In the best near contemporary potrait, the Round Top Society of Antiquary portrait, Richard is shown with curly hair, that falls quite naturally. No need for curlers there. The problem is only that the highlights, that presumably had been there (as was the practice of painters then), vanished with the cleaning of the picture in 2007. Before the cleaning the hair was more accentuated. In the other near contemporary portraits the hair was painted in
a more stylised manner, but also curled. So, IMO, Richard had naturall curly hair.
Certainly he had not the hairstyle of the facial recreation, on which the hair looks thin and uncombed.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
From: "Nicholas Brown nico11238@... []" <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 14:35
Subject: Re: Richard Duke of York
Thanks for posting that, Marie. I had never seen that image of him before. There are 3 other people on the same window. Do you know who they are? Could it be his parents and sister?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/44/59/1d/44591d7d0705f4e6c832bdeb5abb41b8.jpg
He does look young in this particular image, but there is a similarity to the Talbot picture, especially the nose. Are there any reliable pictures of Cecily other than this one?
http://www.richardiii.net/2_2_0_riii_family.php
I'm not sure which one the children look most like, but probably Richard seems most like RofY, with Margaret and Edward being more like Cecily. I'm not sure about Clarence and the others. I was surprised at RofY's blonde hair, which is a similar shade to his grandchildren in the Royal Window. Cecily must have been a brunette though.
Nico
On Sunday, 5 February 2017, 19:06, "eva.pitter@... []" <> wrote:
Hi karen O,
In the best near contemporary potrait, the Round Top Society of Antiquary portrait, Richard is shown with curly hair, that falls quite naturally. No need for curlers there. The problem is only that the highlights, that presumably had been there (as was the practice of painters then), vanished with the cleaning of the picture in 2007. Before the cleaning the hair was more accentuated. In the other near contemporary portraits the hair was painted in
a more stylised manner, but also curled. So, IMO, Richard had naturall curly hair.
Certainly he had not the hairstyle of the facial recreation, on which the hair looks thin and uncombed.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
That's interesting. I had heard of women being depicted with blonde hair to make them look angelic, but it never occurred to me it could apply to men too. However, would the Talbot picture seek to emphasize holiness or his strength as a leader or warrior?
Nico
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017, 9:51, "Hilary Jones hjnatdat@... []" <> wrote:
Hi Nico, sorry to butt in, but you have to be very careful with blonde hair. To artists of that time it denoted holiness (hence so many blonde Virgins) and majesty. So queens (and kings as in the Canterbury window) were often depicted with blonde hair to flatter them. There's even a portrait of MOA with blonde hair, though we know she was dark. The depiction of EW for the Skinners' Company is a good example.The most unflattering (and therefore probably most lifelike) picture of the time I reckon is the 1472 picture of Elizabeth Butler/Mowbray in Long Melford windows where all the depictions are quite different and some women are quite beautiful. What's annoying is that they still have a lot of smashed glass at LM so who knows who else was originally depicted there? Almost certainly our friend John Mowbray. H
From: "Nicholas Brown nico11238@... []" <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 14:35
Subject: Re: Richard Duke of York
Thanks for posting that, Marie. I had never seen that image of him before. There are 3 other people on the same window. Do you know who they are? Could it be his parents and sister?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/44/59/1d/44591d7d0705f4e6c832bdeb5abb41b8.jpg
He does look young in this particular image, but there is a similarity to the Talbot picture, especially the nose. Are there any reliable pictures of Cecily other than this one?
http://www.richardiii.net/2_2_0_riii_family.php
I'm not sure which one the children look most like, but probably Richard seems most like RofY, with Margaret and Edward being more like Cecily. I'm not sure about Clarence and the others. I was surprised at RofY's blonde hair, which is a similar shade to his grandchildren in the Royal Window. Cecily must have been a brunette though.
Nico
On Sunday, 5 February 2017, 19:06, "eva.pitter@... []" <> wrote:
Hi karen O,
In the best near contemporary potrait, the Round Top Society of Antiquary portrait, Richard is shown with curly hair, that falls quite naturally. No need for curlers there. The problem is only that the highlights, that presumably had been there (as was the practice of painters then), vanished with the cleaning of the picture in 2007. Before the cleaning the hair was more accentuated. In the other near contemporary portraits the hair was painted in
a more stylised manner, but also curled. So, IMO, Richard had naturall curly hair.
Certainly he had not the hairstyle of the facial recreation, on which the hair looks thin and uncombed.
Eva
Re: Richard Duke of York
From: "Nicholas Brown nico11238@... []" <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2017, 10:11
Subject: Re: Richard Duke of York
Hi Hilary,
That's interesting. I had heard of women being depicted with blonde hair to make them look angelic, but it never occurred to me it could apply to men too. However, would the Talbot picture seek to emphasize holiness or his strength as a leader or warrior?
Nico
On Tuesday, 7 February 2017, 9:51, "Hilary Jones hjnatdat@... []" <> wrote:
Hi Nico, sorry to butt in, but you have to be very careful with blonde hair. To artists of that time it denoted holiness (hence so many blonde Virgins) and majesty. So queens (and kings as in the Canterbury window) were often depicted with blonde hair to flatter them. There's even a portrait of MOA with blonde hair, though we know she was dark. The depiction of EW for the Skinners' Company is a good example.The most unflattering (and therefore probably most lifelike) picture of the time I reckon is the 1472 picture of Elizabeth Butler/Mowbray in Long Melford windows where all the depictions are quite different and some women are quite beautiful. What's annoying is that they still have a lot of smashed glass at LM so who knows who else was originally depicted there? Almost certainly our friend John Mowbray. H
From: "Nicholas Brown nico11238@... []" <>
To: "" <>
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 14:35
Subject: Re: Richard Duke of York
Thanks for posting that, Marie. I had never seen that image of him before. There are 3 other people on the same window. Do you know who they are? Could it be his parents and sister?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/44/59/1d/44591d7d0705f4e6c832bdeb5abb41b8.jpg
He does look young in this particular image, but there is a similarity to the Talbot picture, especially the nose. Are there any reliable pictures of Cecily other than this one?
http://www.richardiii.net/2_2_0_riii_family.php
I'm not sure which one the children look most like, but probably Richard seems most like RofY, with Margaret and Edward being more like Cecily. I'm not sure about Clarence and the others. I was surprised at RofY's blonde hair, which is a similar shade to his grandchildren in the Royal Window. Cecily must have been a brunette though.
Nico
On Sunday, 5 February 2017, 19:06, "eva.pitter@... []" <> wrote:
Hi karen O,
In the best near contemporary potrait, the Round Top Society of Antiquary portrait, Richard is shown with curly hair, that falls quite naturally. No need for curlers there. The problem is only that the highlights, that presumably had been there (as was the practice of painters then), vanished with the cleaning of the picture in 2007. Before the cleaning the hair was more accentuated. In the other near contemporary portraits the hair was painted in
a more stylised manner, but also curled. So, IMO, Richard had naturall curly hair.
Certainly he had not the hairstyle of the facial recreation, on which the hair looks thin and uncombed.
Eva