A controversial message on a related Forum

A controversial message on a related Forum

2006-05-06 17:39:56
Stephen Lark
Sceptred Isle (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sceptredisle/message/400)
have just posted a message about Plantagenets and Tudors killing each
other, comparing them to cats. I think the poster is American and the
figures he quotes could include Richard and the "Princes".
Would anyone from the American Branch like to join in with the debate
he has launched on there?

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-06 18:03:06
fayre rose
the poster simply copied an article from
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html

personally, i'd have to agree with him that the tudors are like cats..haughty and arrogant, definitely willing to drive away anyone who might tred upon their territory...the lion roars. the king of beasts.

the poster did not compare/mention the plantagenets.

perhaps he meant too, and it was an oversight.

roslyn

Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
Sceptred Isle (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sceptredisle/message/400)
have just posted a message about Plantagenets and Tudors killing each
other, comparing them to cats. I think the poster is American and the
figures he quotes could include Richard and the "Princes".
Would anyone from the American Branch like to join in with the debate
he has launched on there?





SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card Call united kingdom United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel United kingdom vacation United kingdom travel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-06 23:45:51
oregonkaty
--- In , fayre rose
<fayreroze@...> wrote:
>
> the poster simply copied an article from
> http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html
>


I was quite bemused to learn from this article that Richard II was
Edward III's heir and eldest son.

Katy

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-07 04:47:37
Maria
the poster simply copied an article from
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html

personally, i'd have to agree with him that the tudors are like
cats..haughty and arrogant, definitely willing to drive away anyone who
might tred upon their territory...the lion roars. the king of beasts.

the poster did not compare/mention the plantagenets.

perhaps he meant too, and it was an oversight.

Roslyn

Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good judges of
character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but can be
plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will generally play
and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals, or the
prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.

Maria
Elena@...
(owned by two cats)


Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-07 15:01:54
oregonkaty
--- In , Maria <ejbronte@...>
wrote:

>
> Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good judges of
> character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but can
be
> plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will generally
play
> and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals, or
the
> prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.


I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.

Katy

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-07 16:24:54
Paul Trevor Bale
But without the laughs!:-)
Paul

On 7 May 2006, at 15:01, oregonkaty wrote:

> --- In , Maria <ejbronte@...>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good judges of
>> character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but can
> be
>> plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will generally
> play
>> and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals, or
> the
>> prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.
>
>
> I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.
>
> Katy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> ~-->
> Get to your groups with one click. Know instantly when new email
> arrives
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/.7bhrC/MGxNAA/yQLSAA/1WMplB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

"a winner is a dreamer who just won't quit"

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-07 19:13:40
eileen
--- In , Paul Trevor Bale <paultrevor@...> wrote:
>
> But without the laughs!:-)
> Paul

The Tudors - a veritable Nest of Vipers

Carrying on from there - The Stanleys - pirrana fish - may they rot forever!!

Eileen
>
> On 7 May 2006, at 15:01, oregonkaty wrote:
>
> > --- In , Maria <ejbronte@>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good judges of
> >> character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but can
> > be
> >> plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will generally
> > play
> >> and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals, or
> > the
> >> prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.
> >
> >
> > I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.
> >
> > Katy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> > ~-->
> > Get to your groups with one click. Know instantly when new email
> > arrives
> > http://us.click.yahoo.com/.7bhrC/MGxNAA/yQLSAA/1WMplB/TM
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ~->
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> "a winner is a dreamer who just won't quit"
>

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-07 19:34:37
Maria T
The Tudors - a veritable Nest of Vipers

Carrying on from there - The Stanleys - pirrana fish - may they rot
forever!!

Eileen
==========================

About them Stanleys, I wonder a bit. They were very, very clear and
honest about whose side they were on: the side of Stanley. Other clans
would switch around, stab you or themselves in the back and reduce
themselves and you to pulp, but the Stanleys rarely, if ever, turned on
each other, and the message that, as long as you would be useful to
them, they'd be useful to you was very clear. Hire a Stanley, and you
knew what you were getting, which is more than you might get with other
families not directly tied to you - or directly tied to you, as witness
George versus Edward and Richard, or Warwick's turn (and possibly
Hastings' in 1483, but not prepared to swear on that one yet). It was,
I think the marriage to Margaret Beaufort which shot the Stanleys in the
foot, because it forced a commitment to a force outside of, and more
politically potent than the Stanleys themselves. You can see it in the
clumsy tactics used by the Thomas and William as Bosworth came closer,
and you can see it in William's beheading some ten years later and the
neutralization of Thomas during the Henry Tudor reign. For the most
part, during the two reigns of Edward IV, the Stanley clan was no better
or worse than any other grasping, ambitious noble family (about 95% of
the families in the nobility, I'd say), and possibly at least more
predictable because Stanley would be loyal to Stanley, over and above
whoever was in charge of the kingdom at any given time. That makes them
more like lions than like piranha.

A piranha would be more like Juan Pacheco, Marques of Villena, toward
Enrique IV and anyone who came near him.

Maria
Elena@...


Re: A controversial message on a related Forum

2006-05-08 00:00:42
marion davis
Maria wrote: Cats are better than Tudors.

****

I agree 103%. I've shared my home with cats for 31
years, and I've never had a cat that behaved like a
Tudor.

None of my cats ever stole a throne or backdated their
reign. (Henry VII) None of my cats ever imprisoned
stole their ward's inheritance, imprisoned them for
life, and executed them on trumped-up charges. (Henry
VII, Margaret Beaufort did this to Edward, Earl of
Warwick)

I'd say the comparison between cats and Tudors is
inaccurate and unfair.

Marion




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-08 14:16:59
Stephen Lark
--- In , oregonkaty
<no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In , Maria <ejbronte@>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good
judges of
> > character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but
can
> be
> > plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will
generally
> play
> > and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals,
or
> the
> > prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.
>
>
> I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.
>
> Katy
>
I have re-read the original article and it does seem to cover the
whole 1399-1603 period, including THAT accusation against our Richard.

Re: A controversial message on a related Forum

2006-05-08 15:22:49
eileen
--- In , marion davis <phaecilia@...> wrote:
>
>> None of my cats ever stole a throne or backdated their
> reign. (Henry VII) None of my cats ever imprisoned
> stole their ward's inheritance, imprisoned them for
> life, and executed them on trumped-up charges. (Henry
> VII, Margaret Beaufort did this to Edward, Earl of
> Warwick)

Lets not forget that other murder of an innocent person on trumped up charges - Richards
niece Margaret Pole Duchess of Salisbury - executed in the most barbaric circumstances -
by the Weasles son Fat HenryVlll - an elderly lady hacked to death by an axe -
How the Tudors must have feared the Plantagenets - to wipe a whole family out.
Eileen
>
> I'd say the comparison between cats and Tudors is
> inaccurate and unfair.
>
> Marion
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-08 17:51:23
fayre rose
rather than moaning here..why not take some action and contact discovery.com
with enough informed public opinion, the company might clean up its editorial policy.
http://extweb.discovery.com/viewerrelations

cite the url, and list ALL of its inaccuracies.
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html

one would think that a "business" in the business of presenting history would work to ensure accuracy, rather than opinionated misleading information.

if they continue thusly, their credibility will be tatters amongst serious researchers and all who they contact including school teachers.

demand a rewrite and/or rebuttal.

roslyn

Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
--- In , oregonkaty
<no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In , Maria <ejbronte@>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good
judges of
> > character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but
can
> be
> > plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will
generally
> play
> > and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals,
or
> the
> > prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.
>
>
> I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.
>
> Katy
>
I have re-read the original article and it does seem to cover the
whole 1399-1603 period, including THAT accusation against our Richard.






SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card United kingdom flower delivery Call united kingdom United kingdom florist United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-08 18:53:55
fayre rose
this site has also picked up the discovery.com article.
http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/category/whats-new-for-book-lovers/

and so has this one
http://people.smu.edu/rhalperi/updates.html

search for heath on the page.
r

fayre rose <fayreroze@...> wrote:
rather than moaning here..why not take some action and contact discovery.com
with enough informed public opinion, the company might clean up its editorial policy.
http://extweb.discovery.com/viewerrelations

cite the url, and list ALL of its inaccuracies.
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html

one would think that a "business" in the business of presenting history would work to ensure accuracy, rather than opinionated misleading information.

if they continue thusly, their credibility will be tatters amongst serious researchers and all who they contact including school teachers.

demand a rewrite and/or rebuttal.

roslyn

Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
--- In , oregonkaty
<no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In , Maria <ejbronte@>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good
judges of
> > character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but
can
> be
> > plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will
generally
> play
> > and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals,
or
> the
> > prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.
>
>
> I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.
>
> Katy
>
I have re-read the original article and it does seem to cover the
whole 1399-1603 period, including THAT accusation against our Richard.






SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card United kingdom flower delivery Call united kingdom United kingdom florist United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------









SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card United kingdom flower delivery Call united kingdom United kingdom florist United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-08 19:08:02
fayre rose
and if you'd like to contact prof kathleen heath who produced the study...
from the discovery.com article.
Heath, an associate professor of anthropology at Indiana State University, added, "Those who adapt best — better than his/her competitor — in a particular environment are favored by natural selection, that is, live longer and have a better chance of passing on their genes to the next generation."

Heath and her colleagues determined that the murdering royals never sacrificed lineal relatives. Of the 47 killed, only five were not cousins. These included one brother, two uncles and two nephews.

The researchers assigned genetic relatedness values to each individual, so that a parent, for example, is 50 percent, or .5, related to a child, while a full first cousin is .125.
Using these values, the scientists found that executioners never killed in excess of their own nuclear relatedness, meaning the total value assigned to the individual and his or her children.


it would appear her calculations are out, because it is only theory richard killed the boys, h7 and buckingham..especially bucks are far more likely candidates.

to h7 the boys are cousins, to bucks the boys are cousins and nephews of his wife, who possessed no brit royal bloodline.

you''ll find her webpage et al here.
http://www.indstate.edu/gga/gga/javatest/f,s,s/Heath.html
fayre rose <fayreroze@...> wrote:
this site has also picked up the discovery.com article.
http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/category/whats-new-for-book-lovers/

and so has this one
http://people.smu.edu/rhalperi/updates.html

search for heath on the page.
r

fayre rose <fayreroze@...> wrote:
rather than moaning here..why not take some action and contact discovery.com
with enough informed public opinion, the company might clean up its editorial policy.
http://extweb.discovery.com/viewerrelations

cite the url, and list ALL of its inaccuracies.
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html

one would think that a "business" in the business of presenting history would work to ensure accuracy, rather than opinionated misleading information.

if they continue thusly, their credibility will be tatters amongst serious researchers and all who they contact including school teachers.

demand a rewrite and/or rebuttal.

roslyn

Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
--- In , oregonkaty
<no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> --- In , Maria <ejbronte@>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good
judges of
> > character. They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them, but
can
> be
> > plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will
generally
> play
> > and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals,
or
> the
> > prey gets scarce. Cats are better than Tudors.
>
>
> I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas.
>
> Katy
>
I have re-read the original article and it does seem to cover the
whole 1399-1603 period, including THAT accusation against our Richard.






SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card United kingdom flower delivery Call united kingdom United kingdom florist United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------









SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card United kingdom flower delivery Call united kingdom United kingdom florist United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------









SPONSORED LINKS
United kingdom calling card United kingdom flower delivery Call united kingdom United kingdom florist United kingdom phone card United kingdom hotel

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------





Re: [Richard III Society Forum] A controversial message on a relate

2006-05-09 12:39:10
Thanks for the information - I shall do that as soon as my PC is back in
action.

>-- Original Message --
>To:
>From: fayre rose <fayreroze@...>
>Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Re: A controversial message on a related
>Forum
>Reply-To:
>
>
><html><body>
>
>
>and if you'd like to contact prof kathleen heath who produced the study...<BR>
>  from the discovery.com article.<BR>
>  Heath, an associate professor of anthropology at Indiana State University,
>added, "Those who adapt best ? better than his/her competitor ? in a
>particular environment are favored by natural selection, that is, live longer
>and have a better chance of passing on their genes to the next generation."<BR>
>  <BR>
>  Heath and her colleagues determined that the murdering royals never
>sacrificed lineal relatives. Of the 47 killed, only five were not cousins.
>These included one brother, two uncles and two nephews.<BR>
>  <BR>
>  The researchers assigned genetic relatedness values to each individual,
>so that a parent, for example, is 50 percent, or .5, related to a child,
>while a full first cousin is .125.<BR>
>  Using these values, the scientists found that executioners never killed
>in excess of their own nuclear relatedness, meaning the total value assigned
>to the individual and his or her children.<BR>
>   <BR>
>   <BR>
>  it would appear her calculations are out, because it is only theory
>richard killed the boys, h7 and buckingham..especially bucks are far more
>likely candidates.<BR>
>   <BR>
>  to h7 the boys are cousins, to bucks the boys are cousins and nephews
>of his wife, who possessed no brit royal bloodline.<BR>
>   <BR>
>  you''ll find her webpage et al here.<BR>
>  <a href="http://www.indstate.edu/gga/gga/javatest/f,s,s/Heath.html">http://www.indstate.edu/gga/gga/javatest/f,s,s/Heath.html</a><BR>
>  fayre rose <fayreroze@...> wrote:<BR>
>  this site has also picked up the discovery.com article.<BR>
>  <a href="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/category/whats-new-for-book-lovers/">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/category/whats-new-for-book-lovers/</a><BR>
>   <BR>
>  and so has this one<BR>
>  <a href="http://people.smu.edu/rhalperi/updates.html">http://people.smu.edu/rhalperi/updates.html</a><BR>
>   <BR>
>  search for heath on the page.<BR>
>  r<BR>
><BR>
>fayre rose <fayreroze@...> wrote:<BR>
>  rather than moaning here..why not take some action and contact discovery.com
><BR>
>  with enough informed public opinion, the company might clean up its
>editorial policy.<BR>
>  <a href="http://extweb.discovery.com/viewerrelations">http://extweb.discovery.com/viewerrelations</a><BR>
>   <BR>
>  cite the url, and list ALL of its inaccuracies.<BR>
>  <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html">http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060501/royals_his.html</a><BR>
>   <BR>
>  one would think that a "business" in the business of presenting
>history would work to ensure accuracy, rather than opinionated misleading
>information.<BR>
>   <BR>
>  if they continue thusly, their credibility will be tatters amongst
>serious researchers and all who they contact including school teachers.<BR>
>   <BR>
>  demand a rewrite and/or rebuttal.<BR>
>   <BR>
>  roslyn<BR>
>  <BR>
>Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:<BR>
>  --- In , oregonkaty <BR>
><no_reply@...> wrote:<BR>
>><BR>
>> --- In , Maria <ejbronte@>
><BR>
>> wrote:<BR>
>> <BR>
>> >  <BR>
>> > Nah, cats are intelligent, observant, independent, and good <BR>
>judges of<BR>
>> > character.  They're haughty and arrogant when it suits them,
>but <BR>
>can <BR>
>> be<BR>
>> > plenty affectionate and cuddly; and a pride of lions will <BR>
>generally <BR>
>> play<BR>
>> > and work well with each other until or unless invaded by rivals,
><BR>
>or <BR>
>> the<BR>
>> > prey gets scarce.  Cats are better than Tudors.<BR>
>> <BR>
>> <BR>
>> I'd compare the Tudors to a pack of hyenas. <BR>
>> <BR>
>> Katy<BR>
>><BR>
>I have re-read the original article and it does seem to cover the <BR>
>whole 1399-1603 period, including THAT accusation against our Richard.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>  SPONSORED LINKS <BR>
>        United kingdom calling card  
>United kingdom flower delivery   Call united kingdom    
>United kingdom florist   United kingdom phone card  
>United kingdom hotel <BR>
>    <BR>
>---------------------------------<BR>
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS <BR>
><BR>
>    <BR>
>    Visit your group "" on
>the web.<BR>
>    <BR>
>    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<BR>
>[email protected]<BR>
>    <BR>
>    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>of Service. <BR>
><BR>
>    <BR>
>---------------------------------<BR>
>  <BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>  SPONSORED LINKS <BR>
>        United kingdom calling card  
>United kingdom flower delivery   Call united kingdom    
>United kingdom florist   United kingdom phone card  
>United kingdom hotel <BR>
>    <BR>
>---------------------------------<BR>
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS <BR>
><BR>
>    <BR>
>    Visit your group "" on
>the web.<BR>
>    <BR>
>    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<BR>
>[email protected]<BR>
>    <BR>
>    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>of Service. <BR>
><BR>
>    <BR>
>---------------------------------<BR>
>  <BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>  SPONSORED LINKS <BR>
>        United kingdom calling card  
>United kingdom flower delivery   Call united kingdom    
>United kingdom florist   United kingdom phone card  
>United kingdom hotel <BR>
>    <BR>
>---------------------------------<BR>
>  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS <BR>
><BR>
>    <BR>
>    Visit your group "" on
>the web.<BR>
>    <BR>
>    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<BR>
> [email protected]<BR>
>    <BR>
>    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>of Service. <BR>
><BR>
>    <BR>
>---------------------------------<BR>
>  <BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>
>
>
><!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
>
> <br><br>
> <div style="width:500px; text-align:right; margin-bottom:1px; color:#909090;">
> <tt>SPONSORED LINKS</tt>
> </div>
> <table bgcolor=#e0ecee cellspacing="13" cellpadding="0" width=500px>

> <tr valign=top>
> <td style="width:25%;">
> <tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+kingdom+calling+card&w1=United+kingdom+calling+card&w2=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w3=Call+united+kingdom&w4=United+kingdom+florist&w5=United+kingdom+phone+card&w6=United+kingdom+hotel
&c=6&s=179&.sig=4GGc4xia-6uj4vkwxeda1w">United kingdom calling card</a></tt>
> </td>
> <td style="width:25%;">
> <tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w1=United+kingdom+calling+card&w2=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w3=Call+united+kingdom&w4=United+kingdom+florist&w5=United+kingdom+phone+card&w6=United+kingdom+ho
tel&c=6&s=179&.sig=8cAgnmTQK8hWQSrT09Gf-w">United kingdom flower delivery</a></tt>
> </td>
> <td style="width:25%;">
> <tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Call+united+kingdom&w1=United+kingdom+calling+card&w2=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w3=Call+united+kingdom&w4=United+kingdom+florist&w5=United+kingdom+phone+card&w6=United+kingdom+hotel&c=6&s=1
79&.sig=LtswW8ZiUV1kjXQVm82g5Q">Call united kingdom</a></tt>
> </td>
> </tr>
> <tr valign=top>
> <td style="width:25%;">
> <tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+kingdom+florist&w1=United+kingdom+calling+card&w2=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w3=Call+united+kingdom&w4=United+kingdom+florist&w5=United+kingdom+phone+card&w6=United+kingdom+hotel&c=6&
s=179&.sig=fGW6B8GVBZ8wHiilib0-FQ">United kingdom florist</a></tt>
> </td>
> <td style="width:25%;">
> <tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+kingdom+phone+card&w1=United+kingdom+calling+card&w2=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w3=Call+united+kingdom&w4=United+kingdom+florist&w5=United+kingdom+phone+card&w6=United+kingdom+hotel&c
=6&s=179&.sig=1nHG04-Q_xgyixOcRbHjrA">United kingdom phone card</a></tt>
> </td>
> <td style="width:25%;">
> <tt><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=United+kingdom+hotel&w1=United+kingdom+calling+card&w2=United+kingdom+flower+delivery&w3=Call+united+kingdom&w4=United+kingdom+florist&w5=United+kingdom+phone+card&w6=United+kingdom+hotel&c=6&s=
179&.sig=4O6cijxeGAbyWJhxvVxdvw">United kingdom hotel</a></tt>
> </td>
> </tr>
> </tr>
> </table>
>
><!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->
>
>
>
><!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -->
>
><br>
> <div style="text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px;">
> <hr style="border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left;">
> <tt>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS</tt>
></div>
><br>
><ul>
> <tt><li type=square> Visit your group "<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/"></a>"
on the web.<br> </tt>
> <tt><li type=square> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<br> <a
href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe">[email protected]</a><br> </tt>
> <tt><li type=square> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo!
Terms of Service</a>.</tt>
></ul>
><br>
><div style="text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px;">
> <hr style="border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left;">
></div>
></br>
>
><!-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -->
>
>
></body></html>
>
>


___________________________________________________________

Tiscali Broadband from 14.99 with free setup!
http://www.tiscali.co.uk/products/broadband/
Richard III
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.