I am curious again
I am curious again
2006-07-30 16:19:51
So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary peers - I
wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
Tudors?
wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
Tudors?
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] I am curious again
2006-07-31 03:52:41
Perhaps some of those who weren't hereditary peers too.
Of cause one of the nineteenth century ones was descended from the Stanleys. I suppose one cannot help one's ancestors. Though that particular nineteenth century Stanley came out in a poor light when I read a biography of Fitzroy, of Beagle's fame and an early Governor of New Zealand.
Helen Rowe
Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary peers - I
wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
Tudors?
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Of cause one of the nineteenth century ones was descended from the Stanleys. I suppose one cannot help one's ancestors. Though that particular nineteenth century Stanley came out in a poor light when I read a biography of Fitzroy, of Beagle's fame and an early Governor of New Zealand.
Helen Rowe
Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary peers - I
wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
Tudors?
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] I am curious again
2006-07-31 17:17:40
Another Stanley descendant was Lord Monteagle, who betrayed the
Gunpowder Plotters to James I, thus saving the King and entire House
of Peers from a flammable end.
--- In , Helen Rowe
<sweethelly2003@...> wrote:
>
> Perhaps some of those who weren't hereditary peers too.
>
> Of cause one of the nineteenth century ones was descended from
the Stanleys. I suppose one cannot help one's ancestors. Though that
particular nineteenth century Stanley came out in a poor light when
I read a biography of Fitzroy, of Beagle's fame and an early Governor
of New Zealand.
>
> Helen Rowe
>
>
> Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
> So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary
peers - I
> wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
> descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
> Tudors?
>
>
>
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
Gunpowder Plotters to James I, thus saving the King and entire House
of Peers from a flammable end.
--- In , Helen Rowe
<sweethelly2003@...> wrote:
>
> Perhaps some of those who weren't hereditary peers too.
>
> Of cause one of the nineteenth century ones was descended from
the Stanleys. I suppose one cannot help one's ancestors. Though that
particular nineteenth century Stanley came out in a poor light when
I read a biography of Fitzroy, of Beagle's fame and an early Governor
of New Zealand.
>
> Helen Rowe
>
>
> Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
> So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary
peers - I
> wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
> descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
> Tudors?
>
>
>
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
>
Re: [Richard III Society Forum] I am curious again
2006-07-31 21:06:11
And after Mary Queen of Scots execution the Catholic claimant to the
English throne was one Ferdinando Stanley, grandson of William the
b***ard.
Glad the Catholic plots failed else William's betrayal of Richard
might have earned his family the throne.
Imagine!
Paul
On 31 Jul 2006, at 17:17, theblackprussian wrote:
> Another Stanley descendant was Lord Monteagle, who betrayed the
> Gunpowder Plotters to James I, thus saving the King and entire House
> of Peers from a flammable end.
>
>
> --- In , Helen Rowe
> <sweethelly2003@...> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps some of those who weren't hereditary peers too.
>>
>> Of cause one of the nineteenth century ones was descended from
> the Stanleys. I suppose one cannot help one's ancestors. Though that
> particular nineteenth century Stanley came out in a poor light when
> I read a biography of Fitzroy, of Beagle's fame and an early Governor
> of New Zealand.
>>
>> Helen Rowe
>>
>>
>> Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
>> So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary
> peers - I
>> wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
>> descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
>> Tudors?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
"a winner is a dreamer who just won't quit"
English throne was one Ferdinando Stanley, grandson of William the
b***ard.
Glad the Catholic plots failed else William's betrayal of Richard
might have earned his family the throne.
Imagine!
Paul
On 31 Jul 2006, at 17:17, theblackprussian wrote:
> Another Stanley descendant was Lord Monteagle, who betrayed the
> Gunpowder Plotters to James I, thus saving the King and entire House
> of Peers from a flammable end.
>
>
> --- In , Helen Rowe
> <sweethelly2003@...> wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps some of those who weren't hereditary peers too.
>>
>> Of cause one of the nineteenth century ones was descended from
> the Stanleys. I suppose one cannot help one's ancestors. Though that
> particular nineteenth century Stanley came out in a poor light when
> I read a biography of Fitzroy, of Beagle's fame and an early Governor
> of New Zealand.
>>
>> Helen Rowe
>>
>>
>> Stephen Lark <smlark@...> wrote:
>> So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary
> peers - I
>> wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
>> descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
>> Tudors?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Send instant messages to your online friends
> http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
"a winner is a dreamer who just won't quit"
Re: I am curious again
2006-08-03 20:57:17
--- In , "Stephen Lark"
<smlark@...> wrote:
>
> So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary peers - I
> wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
> descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
> Tudors?
I recall a website showing the descent of Jane Birkin (or Charlotte
Rampling) from Clarence via the Dukes of Bedford. This would give us a
famous current actress, a Prime Minister (Lord John Russell) and a
legendary mathematician (Bertrand Russell). However, I need to find it
again and verify the descent.
<smlark@...> wrote:
>
> So many of the early UK Prime Ministers were hereditary peers - I
> wonder whether any of them fit our definition of "Plantagenet":
> descended from one or more of Richard's siblings but not from the
> Tudors?
I recall a website showing the descent of Jane Birkin (or Charlotte
Rampling) from Clarence via the Dukes of Bedford. This would give us a
famous current actress, a Prime Minister (Lord John Russell) and a
legendary mathematician (Bertrand Russell). However, I need to find it
again and verify the descent.