It isn't as good.
It isn't as good.
2002-05-09 22:07:56
This forum isn't what it was. We should go back to the old forum.
Why not form a Macbeth group?
Why not form a Macbeth group?
Re: It isn't as good.
2002-05-14 00:35:24
Hi..I agree this is not very good but I don't think we can go back
as I think Yahoo has closed them. I don't really understand why
this group has gone quiet.Yahoo groups are a pain because of
the ads but it really is not that different from the other way,
people
just stopped posting.
Regards
Beth
--- In @y..., "willison2001"
<willison2001@y...> wrote:
> This forum isn't what it was. We should go back to the old
forum.
> Why not form a Macbeth group?
as I think Yahoo has closed them. I don't really understand why
this group has gone quiet.Yahoo groups are a pain because of
the ads but it really is not that different from the other way,
people
just stopped posting.
Regards
Beth
--- In @y..., "willison2001"
<willison2001@y...> wrote:
> This forum isn't what it was. We should go back to the old
forum.
> Why not form a Macbeth group?
Re: It isn't as good.
2002-05-14 22:25:10
I have sent a post to Yahoo Groups expressing dismay in the current
format. It would be interesting to find out how many other groups
are disenchanted.
It is too bad that they changed the way we view our Groups page. I
guess they have to earn income any way they can. I told them they
pretty much killed the goose as far as I was concerned. There are
other ways I can get my R III chat.
I have no idea how much trouble it would be to transfer to another
venue - or if it would be any different once we switched.
Janet
--- In @y..., "ozsomerset" <ozsomerset@y...>
wrote:
> Hi..I agree this is not very good but I don't think we can go back
> as I think Yahoo has closed them. I don't really understand why
> this group has gone quiet.Yahoo groups are a pain because of
> the ads but it really is not that different from the other way,
> people
> just stopped posting.
> Regards
> Beth
>
> --- In @y..., "willison2001"
> <willison2001@y...> wrote:
> > This forum isn't what it was. We should go back to the old
> forum.
> > Why not form a Macbeth group?
format. It would be interesting to find out how many other groups
are disenchanted.
It is too bad that they changed the way we view our Groups page. I
guess they have to earn income any way they can. I told them they
pretty much killed the goose as far as I was concerned. There are
other ways I can get my R III chat.
I have no idea how much trouble it would be to transfer to another
venue - or if it would be any different once we switched.
Janet
--- In @y..., "ozsomerset" <ozsomerset@y...>
wrote:
> Hi..I agree this is not very good but I don't think we can go back
> as I think Yahoo has closed them. I don't really understand why
> this group has gone quiet.Yahoo groups are a pain because of
> the ads but it really is not that different from the other way,
> people
> just stopped posting.
> Regards
> Beth
>
> --- In @y..., "willison2001"
> <willison2001@y...> wrote:
> > This forum isn't what it was. We should go back to the old
> forum.
> > Why not form a Macbeth group?