hastings

hastings

2008-06-18 19:41:05
hi janet
yes i agree with you
why only hastings?
I read somewhere that he was afraid to execute stanley as his sons would relatiate - also by executing hastings was a risk itself

Re: hastings not stanley

2008-06-18 19:56:06
marion cheatham
In hindsight would have been better if he had got rid of Stanley as well and exiled Morton, how nice it is to be able to look at things several hundreds of years later.  I often wonder it he had killed Tudor at Bosworth, who would have suceeded him eventually, presuming he had not other wife or heirs, my money is on  Lincoln.



--- On Wed, 6/18/08, mezzathewizzard@... <mezzathewizzard@...> wrote:
From: mezzathewizzard@... <mezzathewizzard@...>
Subject: hastings
To:
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 7:40 PM











hi janet

yes i agree with you

why only hastings?

I read somewhere that he was afraid to execute stanley as his sons would relatiate - also by executing hastings was a risk itself

































Richard III
Richard III on Amazon
As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases.