Richards, Templars, and Romanesque churches

Templars and 12th Century Richard I vs Richard III


Greetings from Florida


If there was an error in my naming Richard - I'd like to correct it.


I had no reason to question the article because (Richard I) as Richard Plantagenet and Duke of Aquitane, may well have been known on the continent as Richard III when referred to by or used in conjunction with the Templars.

That be as it may - I will use the name Richard I.


It still remains that it is incorrect to say that the Templars were not active throughout the UK. By example it was the Templars who built the Round Church in London. The Round Church would become the Templars headquarters. They were also the architects of many of the so called Romanesque churches - which were Romanesque on the outside but Egyptian in intent

Look at the ghouls on these corbels -- they are Egyptian.

http://www.beyond-the-pale.org.uk/zDalmeny.htm

Observe the (tongue) and the (material in their mouths - 2nd and 3rd photo) and (the open mouths) and the faces that are opposite one another on the doorways - these are all Egyptian and relate to the Egyptian "I have not" commandments rather than the Church's "You shall not" commandments. Had King Henry VIII known that they were Egyptian in 1539 when he had the monasteries destroyed - he'd have destroyed them too

james

/

the sort of connection between richard iii is that richard was born at about the beginning of the era we know as the renaissance. it would have influenced his life. england was a renaissance friendly country prior to h7.
 
the renaissance was the rebirth of learning/art from ancient greece and rome..this also included egypt and the rest of the middle east. the use of tarot cards in england was probably introduced by either catherine valois or margaret d'anjou. i can't remember which one's father had two decks of the cards. the cards are said to trace their history to eqypt and possibly to china.
 
the templars brought this information to europe during the crusades primarily. the holy land pilgrims also brought back information. there was no high speed communication or travel in those days. consequently it could take a couple of hundred or more years until knowledge was shared.
 
here is a wikipedia link to the templars in england.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Templar_in_England
 
any idea what or where the sheela nagigs and green men represent? richard would have grown up seeing these carvings.


--- On Sun, 7/6/08, james bowles <jamesbowles@...> wrote:

From: james bowles <jamesbowles@...>
Subject: Richards, Templars, and Romanesque churches
To:
Received: Sunday, July 6, 2008, 5:07 PM






Templars and 12th Century Richard I vs Richard III

Greetings from Florida

If there was an error in my naming Richard - I'd like to correct it.

I had no reason to question the article because (Richard I) as Richard Plantagenet and Duke of Aquitane, may well have been known on the continent as Richard III when referred to by or used in conjunction with the Templars.

That be as it may - I will use the name Richard I.

It still remains that it is incorrect to say that the Templars were not active throughout the UK. By example it was the Templars who built the Round Church in London. The Round Church would become the Templars headquarters. They were also the architects of many of the so called Romanesque churches - which were Romanesque on the outside but Egyptian in intent

Look at the ghouls on these corbels -- they are Egyptian.

http://www.beyond- the-pale. org.uk/zDalmeny. htm

Observe the (tongue) and the (material in their mouths - 2nd and 3rd photo) and (the open mouths) and the faces that are opposite one another on the doorways - these are all Egyptian and relate to the Egyptian "I have not" commandments rather than the Church's "You shall not" commandments. Had King Henry VIII known that they were Egyptian in 1539 when he had the monasteries destroyed - he'd have destroyed them too

james

/

All very interesting if you like that sort of thing, but it has
nothing to do with our Richard, so doesn't belong here James.
Paul


On 6 Jul 2008, at 22:07, james bowles wrote:

> Templars and 12th Century Richard I vs Richard III
>
>
> Greetings from Florida
>
>
> If there was an error in my naming Richard - I'd like to correct it.
>
>
> I had no reason to question the article because (Richard I) as
> Richard Plantagenet and Duke of Aquitane, may well have been known
> on the continent as Richard III when referred to by or used in
> conjunction with the Templars.
>
> That be as it may - I will use the name Richard I.
>
>
> It still remains that it is incorrect to say that the Templars were
> not active throughout the UK. By example it was the Templars who
> built the Round Church in London. The Round Church would become the
> Templars headquarters. They were also the architects of many of the
> so called Romanesque churches - which were Romanesque on the
> outside but Egyptian in intent
>
> Look at the ghouls on these corbels -- they are Egyptian.
>
> http://www.beyond-the-pale.org.uk/zDalmeny.htm
>
> Observe the (tongue) and the (material in their mouths - 2nd and
> 3rd photo) and (the open mouths) and the faces that are opposite
> one another on the doorways - these are all Egyptian and relate to
> the Egyptian "I have not" commandments rather than the Church's
> "You shall not" commandments. Had King Henry VIII known that they
> were Egyptian in 1539 when he had the monasteries destroyed - he'd
> have destroyed them too
>
> james
>
> /
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Can you cite any accurate source where Richard Cœur de Lion was
referred to as Richard III, and if so, explain what he was the third
Richard of ? The Templars would not have referred to him as Richard III
unless there was some good reason for doing so, i.e. two earlier
Richards holding the same title or position. As far as I am aware he
was the first member of the English, Norman, Aquitainian, Poitevin or
Angevin ruling families to bear the name.

Richard G

--- In , "james bowles"
<jamesbowles@...> wrote:
>
> Templars and 12th Century Richard I vs Richard III
>
> I had no reason to question the article because (Richard I) as
> Richard Plantagenet and Duke of Aquitaine, may well have been known
> on the continent as Richard III when referred to by or used in
> conjunction with the Templars.

(any idea what or where the sheela nagigs and green men represent? richard would
have grown up seeing these carvings.)here are some search sites that explain abou them. Deehttp://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?fr=ybr_sbc&p=sheela%20nagigshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Man%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0 http://www.mythinglinks.org/ct~greenmen.html%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0%c2%a0 http://www.egreenway.com/meditation/greenman.htm%c2%a0